BIG: Terry McAuliffe's former law firm and the National School Boards Association are pushing (through a case they want to take to the Supreme Court) for an interpretation of Title IX that is less favorable to victims and more favorable to administrators
dailywire.com/news/exclusive…
dailywire.com/news/exclusive…
Loudoun County blamed Title IX for its rape coverup, saying it would lobby Washington to make the law more favorable to victims. But Terry McAuliffe's former law firm and the NSBA (which likened parents to domestic terrorists) are actually pushing for the opposite.
On one side is the NSBA, Fairfax County Public Schools, and its attorney Hunton Andrews (where McAuliffe worked until his campaign).
On the other side is a public interest law firm and 23 women's and civil rights groups.
Hunton lost, but wants to take it to the Supreme Court.
On the other side is a public interest law firm and 23 women's and civil rights groups.
Hunton lost, but wants to take it to the Supreme Court.
FCPS paid Hunton $9M since 2019, the year it named McAuliffe a policy adviser. Hunton paid McAuliffe > $250k in most recent disclosed period
In exchange for the big legal bills, school administrators hope they'll be exposed to less legal liability, including from female victims
In exchange for the big legal bills, school administrators hope they'll be exposed to less legal liability, including from female victims
The point is school admins don't necessarily have the same interests as parents. Why would they? They are discrete interest groups. Often they are at odds
McAuliffe was paid by a law firm that makes big bucks fighting parents and alleged victims on behalf of administrators.
McAuliffe was paid by a law firm that makes big bucks fighting parents and alleged victims on behalf of administrators.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
