I'm not on Team Transitory or Team Persistent when it comes to inflation. I'm on Team Conditional. Whether inflation persists or not will probably be dependent on what the government does, and on how people respond to it.
In other words, Team Transitory says "The Fed doesn't ever need to tighten because inflation will go away on its own. Look, markets expect low inflation in the future."

To which I respond: "Yeah, probably because people think the Fed will tighten."
While Team Persistent says: "Inflation is spiraling out of control, the Fed needs to drop the hammer."

To which I respond: "Not yet; merely a slightly more credible commitment to dropping the hammer if things get worse will probably be enough to prevent the spiral."
Lots of people failed to get this thread, because the don't understand conditional vs. unconditional forecasts. But Tyler Cowen gets it. Read this:

marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolu…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

29 Oct
Good. Glad to see welfare being framed as investment rather than as compassion.
One of America's central problems is that we don't believe in our people. We've been brainwashed to think large segments of our people are just useless trash, so we think giving people money is just a handout to people who have no other option.
If we believed in our people more, we'd understand that they have a ton of potential. Giving them money is often (though of course not always) a way of giving people a boost so they can realize that potential instead of just scrabbling for survival.
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct
Jordan Weissmann is my go-to guy on the specifics of the BBB bill
Actually this is all very good news IMO. The "investment" and "redistribution" parts of the bill are the new centerpieces, while the "cost disease" parts of the bill have been de-emphasized. This is better and more focused than I expected.
I expected the bill to be a bag of stuff I wasn't enthused about, but the new proposal emphasizes the stuff I'm most enthused about.
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct
A new Pew survey shows that "defund the police" is dead.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021…
In June 2020, more Black people, Democrats, and young people wanted to cut police funding than wanted to raise it.

That has now reversed. All three groups are now more in favor of increased spending on police.
In fact, Black Democrats are now more likely than White Democrats to support increased police funding.
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct
Wealth tax is better. Just raising the regular old capital gains tax is better. This tax (an accrual tax) will cause markets to crash, which will hurt Democrats electorally as well as hurting the economy.
And if you don't have the political capital to raise the capital gains tax rate, why do you think you have the political capital to implement a completely new kind of tax? This is highly unlikely to fly, not sure why they're trying it.
Finally, if you're worried about rich people borrowing against their unrealized gains in order to consume, just tax *that*.
Read 4 tweets
21 Oct
In some sense, today's post is my (partial) answer to popularism.

The problem with popularism is that we don't know what will prove enduringly popular, but past experience gives us some clues.

And one such clue is: National security.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/natsec-is-ho…
This is what Dems are largely missing right now. Biden needs to adopt more natsec framing for his agenda. Other Dems, and supporters in the media, need to echo that framing.
And the thing some progressives do when they CONTRAST Biden's agenda with defense spending?

No way! This is the exact wrong thing to do.

Read 4 tweets
19 Oct
For all the discussion about wokeness and lefty activists, and despite the huge size of the Floyd protests, I think the Right has been a greater source of unrest over the last decade.
Most of the deadly violence of this era (synagogue shootings, El Paso, Boogaloo killings) have been from rightists; leftists have killed only a few people, and mostly just protested and complained online. Rightists also regularly threaten to overthrow the government.
Many see this unrest as fundamentally reactionary. But I see it as partly a reaction to the sudden collapse of traditional conservatism -- the abrupt decline of Christianity, the failure of laissez-faire economic policies, and the debacle of Iraq.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(