This op-ed makes a persuasive case that "Havana Syndrome" is a mass psychogenic event. Any supposed "attack" based on secret technology and carried out among a narrow band of people without any real motive should be treated very skeptically.
There are definitely physical signs that some of the people afflicted by "Havana Syndrome" are going through something. But the technology proponents believe is causing it doesn't exist, and the motive behind the "attacks" doesn't make any sense.
It's classic conspiracy theory stuff - secret technology and obscure motives used as an explanation for something that doesn't make sense otherwise. This is how our brains process chaos, by using whatever is at our disposal to turn it into order.
A psychogenic illness is still an illness, and anyone presenting symptoms of "Havana Syndrome" should get whatever treatment they need, with the causes thoroughly investigated. I just wish we didn't jump to "secret weapons" as the only thing it can be.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So...Trump lent his name to a shell company that immediately went public on the strength of that name, to raise money for his new social platform, knowing that investors would short the stock because the platform will fail? Is that right?
I don't really understand the stonks thing, but to a layperson, that seems a lot like fraud. Right??
"Amazing. It's absolutely amazing. That under the right circumstances, a Producer could make more money with a flop than he could with a hit. Hmm... Yes, it's quite possible! If he were certain that the show would fail, a man could make a fortune!"
If this is legit, Ron Watkins filed to run in the Republican primary for the AZ1 district. That seat flipped to the Dems when it was redistricted, and hasn't had a Republican in it since. Also, Ron doesn't live in Arizona, or anywhere in the US.
I'm still very skeptical that this is a serious campaign and not a fundraising scam. This is also the seat that his conspiracy buddy Wendy Rogers ran for (and lost) in 2018. More will be revealed, I guess.
Also, a high profile run for Congress opens Ron up to a lot of questions he might not want to answer. We'll know more if he actually announces he's running.
The last real asset Ron Watkins has, at least in my opinion, is the knowledge of who wrote the Q drops. So at what point does he just announce "I wrote the Q drops, and will tell my story to the first outlet that pays me?"
Ultimately, Ron cares about Ron. Remember his "election fraud video that would save the world" that was full of malware? He doesn't care if admitting he was Q sends believers into a spiral. And chances are, it won't. These people are used to being lied to.
All he has to say is "The Q drops came to me through God, I was only the conduit" and most Q believers will be totally stoked about it. Plenty of televangelists and charismatic leaders have done it before.
Today is the 4th anniversary of Donald Trump's bizarre comment that casually started the dominant conspiracy theory of his presidency. I chronicle it in THE STORM IS UPON US, and am going to quote from that to tell a brief version of the story.
"On October 5, 2017, Trump called the White House press corps, who had been dismissed for the day, back to the State Dining Room. The president was holding court with top-ranking military officers and their families, enjoying the pageantry and adoration of the office..."
"And in that muddled, speaking-to-nobody-in-particular tone into which Trump so often dropped when speaking off the cuff, he casually launched a conspiracy theory that would shatter America’s brain.
Antivax rallies around the world, from Chicago to Barcelona to South Africa - all using the same icongraphy and the same social media tags. This is where to look - not DC.
Why are these all in English? That's a good question, but I'd imagine it's easier to make hundreds of slightly different fliers in one language. And the antivax movement is hugely popular in English-speaking countries.
Clearly this effort to turn out worldwide protests is well-organized and funded. But that doesn't make it fake or inauthentic - if people show up to the rallies, the movement is authentic. And people show up to these rallies, we've seen it over and over.