"House GOP leaders are calling upon the Justice Department to investigate whether EcoHealth Alliance violated the law after the NIH confirmed the organization..violated the terms of its federal grant when it conducted risky bat coronavirus research"

washex.am/3nz48HZ
"[T]he NIH letter 'raises the prospect about whether EcoHealth violated 18 U.S.C. § 1031 and committed..fraud against the US."

"US government’s Grant Fraud..website..lists 'examples of grant fraud,' oncluding 'misrepresenting..project's status to continue receiving..funds.'"
""[B]etween Sept. 30, 2019, and Aug. 3, 2021, EcoHealth 'received $21,648,574 in grant funds from US taxpayers that..company may not have received if it had timely disclosed to NIH that it had created..virus that would trigger..cessation of its experiments'"
"EcoHealth..had six grants from the Pentagon..after September 2019, along with two from the Department of Health and Human Services"
"'The fact that EcoHealth received more than $21 million during this period shows that the company had a clear financial incentive to violate the terms of its grant by failing to stop its experiments.'"
"'In addition, EcoHealth's failure to provide the required reporting to NIH for nearly two years — despite a requirement in the grant to do so annually — suggests that EcoHealth knowingly withheld information from NIH in an effort to misrepresent the project's status.'"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard H. Ebright

Richard H. Ebright Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @R_H_Ebright

28 Oct
"NIH and a high-profile grant recipient are at odds over the reporting and handling of..risky coronavirus study in China. EcoHealth Alliance, the grant recipient, pushed back..against an assertion by the NIH that it failed to promptly report..result"

wsj.com/articles/coron…
"The New York-based nonprofit said in a letter to NIH that was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal that it complied with the requirements."
"The letter is the latest development in a debate over whether NIH’s oversight of risky research is comprehensive enough to prevent laboratory accidents that could cause a lethal pathogen to escape, potentially leading to a pandemic."
Read 10 tweets
26 Oct
"According to the WHO terms of reference, SAGO members 'must be free of any real, potential, or apparent conflicts of interest,' and 'must respect the impartiality..required of WHO.' The following proposed SAGO members do not meet these standards...."

usrtk.org/biohazards-blo…
"Supaporn Wacharapluesadee is a subcontractor on a 2020 multi-million-dollar NIH grant..to EcoHealth Alliance. Her lab at Chulalongkorn University is slated to receive..$1.07 million..Wacharapluesadee’s..subcontractor role..constitutes a conflict of interest and is disqualifying"
"Christian Drosten...signed a letter in the Lancet, orchestrated by Dr. Daszak,..arguing//the SARS-CoV-2 lab origin hypothesis is a conspiracy theory..Such prejudgement is disqualifying; it is incompatible with the standard of 'impartiality' in the WHO SAGO terms of reference.
Read 8 tweets
23 Oct
Covid-19: New WHO group to look into pandemic origins is dogged by alleged conflicts of interest bmj.com/content/375/bm…
"Seven of the current choices..were part of the WHO international team that travelled to China earlier this year to study the origins of SARS-CoV-2 with Chinese researchers."
And three others have issues:

"Wacharapluesadee,..is..subcontractor on..grant for..EcoHealth Alliance."

"Summermatter..asked about..possible lab leak..responded..'I consider it very unlikely, a classic conspiracy theory.'"

Drosten..referred to..possibility..as a 'conspiracy'"
Read 4 tweets
23 Oct
"Wuhan Institute of Virology manipulated a coronavirus to generate..10,000 times the viral load, violating provisions of its NIH contract that forbade unregulated research that could make a disease significantly more dangerous or transmissible."

rollcall.com/2021/10/22/nih…
"The information was revealed this week in a letter from the NIH to House Republicans. NIH said the nonprofit partner, EcoHealth Alliance, must submit any unpublished data to the agency by Monday to come back into compliance with its NIH grant. "
"NIH’s letter states..EcoHealth violated..provision in its contract requiring a report..should..viruses in its experiment produce 'a 1 log increase in growth.' In other words, EcoHealth was not supposed to enhance a virus’s ability to grow by..factor of 10 without notifying NIH."
Read 8 tweets
22 Oct
Relman: "It’s just another chapter in a sad tale of inadequate oversight, disregard for risk, and insensitivity to the importance of transparency..[I]t’s difficult to understand why NIH and EcoHealth have...not explained..irregularities with the..grant."

vanityfair.com/news/2021/10/n…
"On Wednesday, the NIH sent a letter to members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce that acknowledged two facts...."
" One was that EcoHealth Alliance..did indeed enhance a bat coronavirus to become potentially more infectious to humans, which the NIH letter described as an “unexpected result” of the research it funded that was carried out in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
Read 6 tweets
22 Oct
"NIH..said EcoHealth's research..didn’t meet..definition of gain of function research..even though the..lab-created virus was shown to be more deadly to..mice with humanized cells."

"'Because a mouse got sicker doesn’t mean it would make a human sicker'"

dailycaller.com/2021/10/21/nih…
"NIH was effectively saying the only way for EcoHealth to determine whether their lab-created virus is more infectious towards humans is to test the virus on a human."
"In essence, they are claiming that, because the NIH did not fund infection studies with lab-generated viruses and human subjects—Uyghur detainees? Falun Gong dissidents?—the NIH did not fund gain of function research..subject to the federal policies"
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(