1./ Whatever happened to gay male activism? Once upon a time we gay blokes tried to lighten up the world with wit and charm -and alongside our lesbian sisters- built solidarity with others in civil society... such as the hard-pressed working class.👇
2./ Now, tied to a colossal and corrupt LGBTQ+ gravy train too many gay men feel entitled to bully women, talk down to workers by demanding pronoun obeisance and, most disgusting of all, pompously deny the darkest open secret in our movement...lesbians being sexually harassed. 👇
3./ Doesn't that tweet 👆encapsulate the arrogance of "new style gays" to which Chapelle referred? A publisher of an illiterate rag threatens the finest broadcaster on the planet about an important subject; demanding an apology while having no clue to whom he should complain. 🤦♂️
4./ This brittle arrogance has become the reflex tone adopted today by too many gay "spokesmen". It's this perhaps that explains why Peter Tatchell feels free blatantly to misrepresent @ALLIANCELGB. But then again ...he's got used to misrepresenting people, not least himself.
5./ It's the same arrogance that allows a chancer like Matt Lucas to cheerfully defame an organisation led by lesbians as anti-trans, despite the fact he made a significant living doing blackface and ridiculing trans people. Maybe "cis-heteronormativity" made him do it. Or cash.
6./ Elected reps have adopted the hyperbolic voice too. Here's John Nicolson, an MP (and don't you forget it, little people) spreading a laughable conspiracy theory that @ALLIANCELGB was behind a globally organised attempt to take over the SNP. 😂🤦♂️👇
7./ This former (if undistinguished) BBC journo refused to be interviewed by the BBC's 'Nolan Investigates'. Perhaps he was worried he'd be asked to provide evidence of his claims to @ofcom that @ALLIANCELGB was akin to a racist group. Just listen to that pomposity.👇
8./ And then there's St David Paisley whom I'd never heard of until he came screeching and cursing on to my timeline to call me a "POS and a hateful bigot". He recently said he'd sue me for pointing out he'd liked a tweet suggesting trans people should be able to carry guns. 👇
9./ Now he both denies he ever liked the tweet and posts retweets justifying that like. Consistent? The only consistent things about Paisley's brief career as a SJW have been the continual threats of legal action, the victim blaming, the misogyny and his bleating fabrications.
10./ David didn't invent this pattern of gay male bullying that reeks of old style woman-hatred sprinkled with new-style woke glitter. He just came to embody it. If gay men want to rebuild our reputation with women and society maybe it's time we told him and the others to WHEESH.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵 My latest article is illustrated with an image of a cross-dressing Darth Vader. The reason is that after a series of legal triumphs by a rebel alliance of feminists, Christians, free speech defenders and gender critical gays the Trans Empire is about to strike back. 👉
2./ Already, the lobby's fingerprints are all over the EHRC's Draft Code. It's no accident the EHRC Chair fails to use the word 'women' in this video. She also claims the Code was 'updated after changes in the law'. Not true. The law was merely clarified.
3./ As if that isn't bad enough just 48 hours before the Code was published the UK govt announced it will give a whopping £21M to the LGBTQ+ lobby over the next 3 years. A bribe to Stonewall etc to compensate for the parts of the EHRC Code they couldn't undermine? 🤔
1./ My latest article explores the truth behind an incredible scandal. 3 days ago the UK government announced it will host a huge jamboree for the LGBTQ+ lobby next year. As if that's not bad enough it will also hand over £21M to insane LGBTQ+ organisations. What's going on? 👉
2./ I argue this £21M is the price Labour is willing to pay to keep the LGBTQ+ lobby onside. In 2022 I reported on how the lobby similarly tried to screw the British taxpayer out of £10M as part of a crazy 'Safe to Be Me' conference. Luckily for us the conference collapsed.👉
3./ The lobby had to boycot the Conference when @KemiBadenoch refused to sign off a
Conversion Therapy ban designed to prevent gender nonconforming kids getting therapy. I revealed the 'Safe To Be Me' grift was organised by prominent Tory gays. Who's behind this latest heist? 👉
1./ 🧵In 2001 David Paulden changed his name to Zack Polanski. In my latest article I question the reasons for the choice and suggest his new name signalled contempt for his biological family, a tangled attitude towards his Jewish identity and the birth of his Messiah complex.
2./ Polanski claims his new surname pays homage to his ancestors. Yet he offers wildly contradictory accounts of their lives and has shown no interest in finding out the truth. Stranger still was his decision to change his first name to that of this fictional 8 year old boy . 👇
3./ Zacharias (Zach) Wrench is a character from 'Goodnight Mister Tom' a children's book the LGBTQ+ lobby adores because it celebrates the 'chosen family' over the biological equivalent. Zach forms an intense relationship with a broken and troubled boy called William.👇
1./ 🧵The story of Lord Ahmed reveals startling similarities between Muslim activism and the trans lobby. Both play the victim, make hyperbolic claims about hate crime and refuse to take abuse seriously. Ahmed is a serial offender yet hobnobs with the Muslim elite. 👉
1/of 17
2./ Earlier this month the Sunday Times revealed Ahmed played a starring role at a high-profile event for Pakistani-Brits where he sat alongside a Labour MP. It didn't seem to matter Ahmed had been jailed twice; once for buggering an 11 year old boy. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
3./ Afzal Khan MP is a champion of Islamophobia Awareness Month. Perhaps if he spent less time with a convicted sex offender there would be less "Islamophobia". As for Ahmed, he perfectly illustrates how Muslim agitators use allegations of bigotry to try to deflect criticism.
1./ Labour's Pakistani Problem. The Times reports a Labour MP took part in an event with convicted child abuser Lord Ahmed. Why is this such political dynamite? Ahmed was the first Pakistani councillor in Rotherham; infamous for its 'grooming' gangs
1of/11 thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
2./ In 2022 Ahmed was convicted of raping an 11 year old boy and an under age girl. The fact Ahmed was a teenager at the time (in the 1970s) helped reduce his sentence on appeal. But here's the thing: Ahmed had accomplices when he raped these two kids. 👉 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
3./ Ahmed's two older brothers were "deemed unfit to stand trial" (conveniently) yet the jury made clear it believed they'd also taken part in what were effectively gang rapes. Can it be any wonder Pakistani politicians in Rotherham refused to take 'grooming' gangs seriously?
1./ 🧵 Why did the SNP ignore the crimes of Jordan Linden who has been convicted of sex offences against young men and boys? In my latest article I dissect the culture of a party that led gay predators to believe they had a free pass.
Click on link in my bio to read.👆
1/of 7.
2./ After gay marriage was passed the SNP was so desperate to convince gay men the party was their natural home its culture changed. Soon it began to resemble that of a sleazy gay bar, complete with innuendo, boozing and misogynist drag queens performing at SNP events.
3./ After Derek Mackay was fired for harassing a 16 year old boy it was revealed Nicola Sturgeon had banned him from drinking at Conference. When drunk he tended to grope men. Shame she didn't stop him going on school visits which is how he met that 16 year old boy.