Post

@RashidaTlaib

@AOC

@RepAndyBiggsAZ

@CoriBush

More from @JunkScience

Steve Milloy

@JunkScience

Mar 7

America is running out of power because of the climate hoax and anti-fossil fuel policies of @BarackObama and @JoeBiden. 1/

washingtonpost.com/business/2024/…

New electricity demand has more than doubled since 2017. 2/

Data center demand for electricity is projected to increase 50% by the end of the decade.

10 large nuclear plants would be required to meet this demand. 3/

Read 6 tweets

Steve Milloy

@JunkScience

Jan 7

This and all similar global temperature graphs are meaningless.

The great former MIT physics professor Walter Lewin explains why. 1/

Former MIT physics professor Walter Lewin explains why NOAA temperature graphs are "meaningless." 2/

A few more points:

1. Less than 8% of NOAA temperature stations are accurate to within 1°C.

2. In 1885, for example, not much of the globe was covered by surface temperature stations.

3. Even today, much of the Earth's surface its not covered by temperature stations.

That's just some of the uncertainty omitted from NOAA's "global temperature" graph. 3/junkscience.com/2016/01/only-7…

Read 4 tweets

Steve Milloy

@JunkScience

Oct 21, 2023

Norwegian statistics bureau throws cold water on emissions-driven global warming hysteria.

"We find that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be strong enough to cause systematic changes in the temperature fluctuations during the last 200 years."

More from the Norwegian statistics bureau:

All four previous interglacial periods were warmer than today, while CO2 at pre-industrial levels.

2/ ssb.no/en/natur-og-mi…

More from the Norwegian statistics bureau:

- Current Greenland temperatures have not exceeded natural variability of the past 4,000 years.

- Long periods over the past 10,000 years were warmer than today.

3/ ssb.no/en/natur-og-mi…

Read 8 tweets

Steve Milloy

@JunkScience

Oct 4, 2023

The Red Pope swings and misses at the origin of warming and emissions:

1. The current warming trend began at the bottom of the Little Ice Age in the late 1600s.

2. Recent warming began with the series of El Ninos that began in 1980.

3. We are in an El Nino year now.

4. As to emissions, warming precedes emissions. It gooses the natural carbon cycle. See Vostok ice cores and this -

5. Only 12% or so of atmospheric CO2 is manmade. 8/

The Red Pope just makes it up:

1. There is no way to say that the temperature rise since the 1970s is the fastest in 2,000 years.

2. There was little if any urban heat island effect 2,000 years ago and no satellites.

3. Then there's this: "Dansgaard-Oeschger events are rapid N. Hemisphere temp jumps of up to 15°C in Greenland that repeatedly occurred w/i a few decades during the last ice age."

4. Climategate revealed that temperature targets like 1.5°C are just 'plucked out of thin air' and are not science.

5. No one knows what the global temperature in 1850 was.

6. 'Ocean acidification' is a myth. The oceans may have become slightly less basic, but that is not more acidic. Two is not more negative than three.'

7. There is no evidence of any effects from any ocean pH change.

8. Norther Hemisphere snow cover is trending up. 9/

The Red Pope imagines the fake 97% 'climate consensus' is science and attacks capitalism.

1. Recent warming correlates with El Ninos, not emissions.

2. Consensus is not science. And the 97% consensus is bogus.

3. Capitalism and emissions have taken humanity from less than 1 billion to over 8 billion people. You'd think the Pope would be praising both. 10/junkscience.com/2023/01/milloy…
wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08/30/97-…

Read 9 tweets

Steve Milloy

@JunkScience

Aug 8, 2023

USA Today doesn't like my tweet from last month👇and tries to 'fact check' it.

Let's walk through USA Today fact-checker Kate Petersen's effort. 1/ https://t.co/8QbMtAiebpusatoday.com/story/news/fac…

USA Today's 'fact check' is dishonest from the start.

Although the 'fact check' presents several images, the tweet being attacked is not one of them. The tweet is merely linked and quoted.

The tweet's graph, of course, is what made it 1.9 million views-compelling. 2/

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

The USA Today 'fact check' reports that the satellite data among NOAA and NASA program vary.

First, all satellite temps are processed estimates and not direct measurements. So different processing ill produce different estimates.

I like the NASA data processed by the University… https://t.co/hTW9IAPaAgtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Read 5 tweets

Steve Milloy

@JunkScience

Jul 25, 2023

Climate deception exposed in a short thread:

@USAToday recently ran this opinion piece raving about deaths from heat waves.

Note the cite to the Lancet Planetary Health🙄 study. 1/

Here's a chart from the Lancet Planetary Health🙄 study.

Note how the chart is made to look as if heat deaths are as big or even a bigger problem than deaths from cold in some countries.

Can you spot the deception? Even I initially missed it. 2/

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Now here's the Lancet Planetary Health🙄chart (A) vs. the chart re-made by the @CO2Coalition (B) with the same death rate (X-axis) scale for cold and hot.

Look at how the Lancet chart misleads viewers by barring out cold deaths in units of 50 vs. only 10 for heat deaths...… https://t.co/7W8C8H3oFUtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Steve Milloy

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @JunkScience

Steve Milloy

Steve Milloy

Steve Milloy

Steve Milloy

Steve Milloy

Steve Milloy

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!