According to the new definition in some of the recently passed legislation, I found a few examples of schools and textbooks that promote Critical Race Theory in schools.
A thread.
First, let's agree that we shouldn't even argue about the 1800s. According to the CDC, the average life expectancy in the US is 78 years old, which means a 78-year-old would've entered school in 1949. But let's skip the 40s. In fact, let's skip the 1950s too.
Instead, every one of these examples of CRT is from the 1960s forward, which means the people who learned these lessons are statistically still living, most are still in the workforce, in fact, NO ONE who learned any of these CRT lessons are even old enough to get Social Security
It's a good thing SC's legislature defines critical race theory because every history student until 1984 learned that:
"Africans were brought from a worse life to a better one. As slaves, they were trained in the ways of civilization."
Again, no "race, ethnicity religion, color or national origin is supposed to be inferior or superior in SC schools, but the book also says:
"...the slaves were given the opportunity to become Christians in a Christian land, instead of remaining heathen in a savage country."
And:
“Most slaves were treated well, if only because it was to the planter’s interest to have them healthy and contented...The Africans were used to a hot climate. They made fine workers under the Carolina sun.”
Here's what they learned about white supremacist terrorists:
In Alabama, there's no CRT law. The state school board just banned it, which would have outlawed nearly every textbook in Alabama up until the 1980s Especially something like this that describes how slavery was so enjoyable.
Or this one, from the 1970s that showed how Slavery was "one of the earliest forms of Social Security in the United States."
Or the one that excused terrorism because "Many Alabama white men believed that they could not depend on the laws or the state government"
This is CRT
In Kentucky's 1983 curriculum, they actually had a film that showed slave life in Kentucky was not "as bad as in other areas of the South.
Then they did an exercise where the kids pretended to be slavemasters!
Thank GOD Kentucky outlawed it after teaching it for 200 years
Texas just lies or eliminates history altogether!
They didn't forget to include Reconstruction, redlining etc. The publisher removed subjects out of Texas' textbooks!
But that was way back in... *checks notes*
Today
It's today, y'all.
Virginia's slave code forbade slaves from reading, owning guns and traveling. But here's what Virginia's 4th-grade textbooks taught kids until the 1970s.
Now, this purposeful lie is SPECIFICALLY intended to make white kids feel good.
But it's not just in the South.
Here's what a textbook from Connecticut taught fourth graders in 2016/
Apparently they don't believe that children are the future because they don't teach them well.
Or maybe the greatest love of all is whiteness.
And one of the most widely used textbooks in the country, The American Pageant, describes the human trafficking of the Trans Atlantic slave trade as "immigration" and says slaves helped out with "chores" on "agricultural plantations"
Good times.
In every state's definition of CRT, these would be banned, even though some of them are being used.
It's because they aren't trying to outlaw CRT. They're trying to outlaw the truth and and continue with the lies.
And I truly understand why they're doing it.
BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW THEY LEARNED LIES!
Only 8% of HS seniors can identify slavery as a cause of the Civil War.
68% don't know the 13th Amendment ended slavery.
Only 16% know that the Constitution provided protections for slaveholders
And THEY DID BETTER THAN MOST AMERICANS
That's why people should actually use these new laws to make sure schools are teaching the correct version of history.
But I just hope you can accept my apology. I was wrong.
White people have been learning CRT this whole time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now, the first thing we have to acknowledge the inherent whiteness of your question.
You don't get to define the idea of freedom. For instance, there is a reason why most countries don't allow everyone to own guns carte blanche; it's stupid.
Had it not been for slavery, 2nd Amendment wouldn't exist in the federal constitution. Only 4 of the original 13 state constitutions contained a "right to bear arms'
According to @Grok, Apartheid Elon is literally the biggest spreader of misinformation on Twitter. But I'm willing to give the literal Grammar Nazi a pass on this one because he doesn't know much about HIS OWN history.
It began before America existed, when the Favres, a white family (Yes, an ancestor of Brett) moved to the Mississippi Valley to start a family business. They initially worked for France. Then, Spain. They eventually secured a lucrative contract with the US government.
The scam was simple. They would move near a indigenous people to trade guns in exchange for allowing white people to live in peace.
Now, EVERY CULTURE fought over territory, including the Choctaw & other natives. So having more guns than a rivals meant more territory.
In the days before WebMD, an enterprising scammer could make a fortune promoting ANYTHING as a health product. If you wanted to stay healthy, you needed to include gin, a few cigarettes and some tonic to your health routine
But if a scammer REALLY wanted people to trust a product, they would sell it straight to a pharmacy. Like the dude who couldn't sell his tonic named after Dr. Joseph Lister (who had nothing to do with it). He made a deal pharmacist, & the pharmacist sold it as a health drink
I've seen SO MANY ppl use the shutdown as an opportunity to demonize people who receive SNAP benefits, WIC and any kind of government assistance.
Here's the thing:
I agree with those people.
We need to end the WHITE welfare state
BECAUSE welfare works.
A thread:
The original welfare program began when the government decided to help the lazy, uneducated Jamestown colonists who didn't want to work. In exchange for bringing carpenters, farmers & indentured servants who knew how do stuff, colonizers received 50 free acres in "headrights" or "patents."
Virginia even recorded names of the migrant workers. On Apr 19, 1638, George Menefie received 3,000 acres for 60 "servants." But there's only 37 names.
What happened?
He received 1,150 acres, an area about the size of Harlem, for 23 unnamed "negroes..."
I’m sure you think I’m gonna mention Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, the Black fur trader who is known as the first non-indigenous resident of Chicago.
But du Sable was not enslaved when he moved to the mouth of the Chicago river in 1790.
So who TF was buying furs?
Well, remember all that was French territory. In 1719 French entrepreneur Philippe François Renault hopped in a boat in the South of France, stopped in Haiti to purchase 200-500 humans beings & headed to “Upper Louisiana”
By 1760, 900 ppl were enslaved in “Illinois Country”