Income/spending/inflation data for September:
Personal income (nominal): -1%
Consumer spending (nominal): +0.6%
Consumer prices: +0.3% m/m, +4.4% y/y
Core consumer prices: +0.2% m/m, +3.6% y/y bea.gov/news/2021/pers…
September Employment Cost Index, *three month* change:
Total compensation: +1.3% (vs 0.7% in June)
Wages and salaries: +1.5% (0.9% June)
Leisure & hosp. wages/salaries: +2.6% (2.8% June) bls.gov/news.release/e…
The drop in income in September was driven by the end of expanded federal unemployment benefits. Wage and salary income actually rose faster in Sept. than in August.
Overall consumer prices were up 4.4% from a year ago, the fastest rate of inflation since 1991. But the month-to-month rate of inflation has slowed significantly since the spring.
For all the talk of Delta's impact on the economy, overall services spending continued to rise through the summer and into fall. But the real story is in goods spending, which remains extraordinarily high (a big part of the reason for all the supply-chain issues).
It's even clearer when we break up goods spending. Durables spending has been through the roof, and while it's eased off a bit some recently, it's still extremely elevated.
Of course, those are nominal spending figures, which means they're capturing price increases as well as volume increases. In real (inflation-adjusted) terms, durable-goods spending has fallen by more, and services spending is still below prepandemic levels.
Americans, collectively, still have a lot of cash to spend. Monthly savings rates have finally come down close to prepandemic levels, but that still means people haven't spent down accumulated savings.
Caveat, as always: These savings are VERY unequally distributed.
To my earlier point about Delta: You can see its effects in a few select categories (air travel, hotels, movies). But other categories held up ok, and overall services spending kept rising.
OK, shifting over to the Employment Cost Index data. As a reminder, these numbers are a much better measure of wage growth than the better-known earnings data in the monthly jobs report, because ECI tries to adjust for compositional shifts.
Overall wages and salaries rose 1.5 percent from June-September, and were up 4.2% year-over-year. Total compensation (incl. benefits) was up 1.3% (3.7% y/y). That's a significant acceleration from the already big increases in June.
Unsurprisingly, wages are rising particularly fast in leisure and hospitality -- although wage growth there actually slowed slightly from June. (Still up 2.6% in just three months.)
It's worth looking at wage growth vs its prepandemic trend path. For both the private sector as a whole and for leisure & hospitality in particular, the recent growth represents a clear acceleration, not just in growth rates but in absolute levels.
This looks very different if you adjust for inflation, however. Leisure and hospitality workers are seeing real gains against their prepandemic trend. But faster inflation means that workers as a whole are falling behind, despite substantial (nominal) wage gains.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This story is generating lots of reaction. Which is good! I think it's an important story. But also a nuanced one. And so a few points I think it's worth making, in a Saturday evening 🧵:
1. I'm getting lots of comments about how this is obviously political manipulation of the economic numbers. I don't think this is as cut-and-dry a case as it might look to some people.
For one thing, there are very real issues with the CPI's legal services index. See this screenshot -- the index hasn't been published regularly since early 2023. So looking for an alternative data source is hardly crazy on its face.
OK, so I imagine everyone has moved on from this by now, but since I finally have a few minutes, I thought I'd do a quick thread explaining this, since it is FAR from intuitive.
The question @TheStalwart is asking here is very reasonable. If year-over-year inflation is calculated by measuring the price level in November 2025 and comparing it to the price level in November 2024, then nothing that happens in the middle should matter.
But with shelter (and to some degree with other things, but I'm going to stick with shelter here), we *don't* actually calculate inflation that way. At least not really.
It's #jobsday! Except it isn't, because of the government shutdown. Which means that we're left sifting through alternative data sources to try to figure out what's going on in the labor market.
So, what are those sources telling us? A 🧵:
Start with job growth: Measures from ADP, Revelio, LinkedIn, etc., all tell subtly different stories, but they mostly agree on the big picture. After slowing dramatically over the summer, private-sector job growth has remained weak, but it hasn't necessarily slowed much further.
A few quick #JOLTS 📈:
Starting with: Job openings are way down from their peak, but they've fallen slowly if at all in recent months. No obvious sign that labor demand is falling off a cliff.
But it IS getting harder to find a job. There is now less than one job opening per unemployed worker. Not a low rate by historical standards, but definitely weaker than just before the pandemic (and way weaker than at the peak of the reopening boom).
The hiring rate (gross hiring, not the net job change we measure in the Friday jobs reports) has been below its long-run average for more than a year. It had seemed like it was leveling off, but might be falling again now, though hard to say definitively just yet.
President Trump didn't like the jobs numbers, so he fired the person responsible for producing them.
It's a move that has been tried before, by leaders of countries from Argentina to Greece to the Soviet Union. It rarely ends well.
(Link at end of thread)
Janet Yellen, not a person prone to hyperbole, put it this way: “This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic."
Key point from Andreas Georgiou, who was criminally prosecuted for insisting on reporting accurate deficit figures when he was head of Greece's statistical agency: Reliable data is essential for democracy.
CBO is out with its final cost estimate of the tax-and-spending bill passed by the House.
- Revenue ⬇️ by $3.7 trillion over 10 years
- Spending ⬇️ by $1.3 trillion
- Debt ⬆️ by $2.4 trillion over 10 years
- Uninsured pop. ⬆️ by 10.9 million in 2034
Full analysis: cbo.gov/publication/61…
The spending cuts mostly come from Medicaid ($344 billion over 10 years), food stamps and related programs ($295 billion) and the Affordable Care Act ($132 billion).
Note that these estimates don't take into account the macroeconomic impacts of the policy changes (it is not "dynamic" in wonk parlance). So to the extent tax/spending cuts affect economic growth, that will also affect revenues. CBO is working on an analysis that estimates these effects.