Welp. Treasury added one of the Iranian drone industry guys I've been following to its SDN list. Probably should've dumped my notebook on that beforehand. Been following Yousef Aboutalebi for a while. You're gonna wanna hit mute because this could go long home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/…
Treasury sanctioned the head of the IRGC drone unit who was responsible for the delta wing drone attack on the Mercer Street ship in the Gulf a few months ago. But they also hit my dude Yousef Aboutaleni, the CEO of Mado, the company that powered Iran's drones (they make engines)
Here's Yousef in happier times at the Damascus Air Show showing off Mado's collection of engines
So what kind of stuff do they make? Knockoffs. From their old website, here's the MDR-200. Google those specs and reverse image search the stock art and guess what you find.
You can go through the list of Mado engine products and see the same thing. They're clearly knocking off Western-model drone engines. The usual (but not exclusive) process was to take a western model number and a Mado model prefix of MD or MDR.
Take the MD 550 found on Iran's Ababil-3 drones. It's basically the Limbach 550, at least judging by its specs. One of the early questions I had: was Mado just a smuggling front or did they do actual copies? Because a little before Mado got going... reuters.com/article/us-ira…
Don't take my word for it. Check the WikiLeaks declassified cables from 2006ish, about three years before Mado got rolling. wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/0…
Also take Yousef's word for it when he's bragging about how Iran is now making engines that were previously only made in German, the US, and the UK isna.ir/news/8905-0019…
Felt fairly confident that Mado wasn't just a front for smuggled engine tech but was actually making engines for Iran's military drones. One of his employees was kind enough to post this to LinkedIn and settle the question (since deleted, I think)
Ok, but how much was Mado doing this on their own? That's a good question because there's a China angle I was never able to quite nail down.
Hong Kong business records are great. In the early 2010s, two companies get registered in HK: Mado, in Yousef's name, and Kado, in the name of the dude who registered Mado's website.
And then shortly afterwards, Mado and Kado combine their equity in a mainland company, Yiwu Mado Trading Company.
And no, this is probably not just a business convenience thing. We know this thanks to Facebook. Our dude definitely spent some time in Beijing.
But here's where it gets interesting. You remember the format for Iran's drone engine company knocking off foreign engines—MD/MDR + original model number. Well when Mado got going, this company Beijing Micropilot started offering engines like that.
Keep in mind, those format designations do not exist *anywhere* else. And the engines Beijing Micropilot were all the same models Mado offered.
Remember that time Iranian delta wing drones and cruise missiles blew up an oil facility in Abqaiq, Saudi Arabia? You'll never guess what markings the UN panel of experts found on the engines. reliefweb.int/sites/reliefwe…
So: Iranian military UAV engine company sets up companies in Hong Kong and the mainland, CEO spends some time in Beijing. Chinese company offers eerily similar engines to the one Iranian company offers. One of them shows up in an attack on Saudi Arabia
And lest you doubt Mado is sourced up well in the IRGC, here's the head of the IRGC Aerospace Force talking up Mado engines on Iranian TV
Here's a 2014 TV spot celebrating the IRGC Aerospace Force Self Sufficiency Jihad Org's "achievements" with Mado engine cameos
(Weird bit of trivia. Mado's HQ is in the Shokohiye industrial park north of Qom where one of the incidents involving suspected sabotage of a petrochemical plant took place back in May) jpost.com/middle-east/fi…
In conclusion, don't leave this stuff lying around in your notebook. Publish it before .gov scoops you.
Although in fairness procrastinating for seven years on this does seem excessive on my part
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My latest: Someone has spent the past four years creating fake Mossad recruiting websites and buying Google Ads to target them at intelligence and military veterans from Iran, the Assad regime, and Hezbollah. thedailybeast.com/shady-network-…
We found the sites while looking into a series of phishing domains that spoofed legitimate news organizations like Business Insider, Jerusalem Post, and the UAE-based Khaleej Times along with think tanks like the Quincy Institute, Stimson Center, Begin-Sadat Center, & Gatestone
Bit of a thread here. Meet "VIP Human Solutions," which pretends to be an Israel-based "consulting" firm interested in hiring intelligence & security veterans of the Assad regime & Hezbollah. They claim to offer big salaries & fast hiring for folks with the right experience.
Missile found near Tuz Khurmatu Air Base in Iraq is a pristine Iranian 358, the hybrid surface-to-air munition/drone first ID'ed by Centcom from a seizure in Yemen.
In Yemen we've seen this launched at U.S. drones. Per NYT, those infrared lenses on the side are designed as to defeat infrared countermeasures on helicopters. So yeah, sure looks like someone tried to take down a helicopter or drone or (insert here) last night.
Our good friend Mohajer-4 A041-65 does not appear to have seen much action outside of the occasional expo appearance over the last eight years. 2013 vs 2021. Few scratches but still good enough for dog and pony shows.
Same cannot be said for A041-65's buddy, A041-66. A041-66 had a very Forrest Gump like existence.
See, A041-66 was seen at that same 2013 delivery ceremony for the Yasir drone. Only unlike his number neighbor, 66 was in a bucket of parts and not fully assembled like 65.
Watching the 60 Minutes segment on the Oath Keepers and it occurs to me that, while we have breakdowns of Jan 6 rioters veteran status and patchy numbers on service background, we don’t know a lot about MOS. Specifically infantry vs not infantry.
Lots of references to why the Oath Keepers and other militia recruit veterans for tactical experience but it’d be nice to know if that’s actually born out by the data instead of just assumed.
“Are these people falling back on and passing along firsthand combat experience or are they trying to get it” seems like an important question from a recruitment & radicalization POV.