If I am serious, that presentation was an insight into the limits of the imagination and creativity of the management of the company. Just because you hit the jackpot doesn’t mean you have the talent to do whatever you think of, or even that those ideas you can think of are good.
It honestly, and this is just me, looked like the normal, slightly-out-of-touch-rich-people-thinking-they-invented-everything routine. There was nothing interesting in what they showed, and most of the ideas were stale already decades ago.
I made a game with a meta-verse interface, and worked on an early cyberpunk game, both in the 90s. Both would not be considered useful interfaces. Second Life is a masterclass in what works and fails in these spaces and none of that learning seemed to be reflected either.
PlayStation tried and failed at a meta-verse model, as have many many other companies. So the question is, why would Facebook do better? It’s so weird that it makes me feel drunk. but I guess we will see now what happens when a social media audience is dragged into System Shock.
I must also point out here that Facebook (Meta) have an insanely talented AR/VR team lead by a brilliant and kind friend of mine. I worry that those people deserve a better vision to launch their hardware into, but at the very least, they’re getting funded to push it forward./end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 8-10 hours this will be Posole, for our last full family meal before we send @Max_Blackley and @monty_decker off to University. I am feeling all of the feelings. I have checked the rules and I’m lowering the whisky threshold to noon or before.
Like many things, the exacting attention to detail in doing something FIRST means it’s often the best version possible of something. Here this is clearly the case. A labor of love, talent, and incredible technical and artistic vision, from a very brave person.
I want to tell you a couple things about one of my most cherished things, a tool so useful and powerful that I honesty have come to look at it as a friend. Weird? Maybe. Read on:
At its simplest description, it’s a book of solutions to nasty sums and integrals. It has pages and pages of seemingly obscure and sometimes really daunting stuff. But that’s just scratching the surface…
In today’s world of symbolic tools and easy access to solutions all over the place is this even relevant? I’d argue it’s more relevant than ever. Because aside from its mind-boggling completeness, you get to see all the stuff you’re NOT looking for, all around, and sometimes…