See. Another state, same story. The British increase the taxes drastically and it's the king of Nilagiri who takes the beating because of that.
Let me try to make this a thread. Whenever I come across my old stuff, I will plug it here.
Vishwanath Shahdeo, the Zamindar of Barkagarh joined the War of Independence in 1857 because the missionaries converted tribals and instigated them to forcibly take over his lands.
But, what is not told here is, there is no king in Keonjhar in 1915.
Guess Keonjhar needs to be looked more closely - not just Keonjhar but every kingdom where there was a regency.
On Ravenshaw of Ravenshaw College fame. Guess the college should be named Ratna Naik College or Rani Bishnupriya College?
Further more on Keonjhar settlement
How consistently the British used the minority of kings to increase their profits!! Bamra this time.
Land Settlement in Nayagarh
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
On Sambalpur Fort
Can the same reason be attributed to Bamanghati mess?
Baud Kandhamal rebellion
Well, Ravenshaw doesn't turn out to be as great as he is projected to be...he was the one who presided over the 1866 famine which forced the British not to plan for a repeat.
"embodied a valued tradition of Indian culture and civilization"
Bikaner. The king has no authority to change the decisions made during his regency.
Another minority regency ruling.
Jaora this time. King sacked a minister, the British retaliated by imposing an advisory council on him and the advices the council gave, the kingdom soon slipped into arrears and had to go for loans!!
And how do you clear off the debts? Insult Talukdars, get offended by the offended Talukdars and impose fines on them.
Experiments, eh?
We are happy to allow the king to do whatever he wants till he doesn't cross the line. What are the lines?
Pudukkottai again. The legal position of an Indian king.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People think as if Vasco Da Gama did a great thing by discovering a sea route to India. It's not so. He didn't do anything actually. Bartolomeu Dias already crossed the Cape of Good Hope and confirmed that the coast turns North East from there. He would oversee building of
Vasco da Gama's ships and would accompany him at least till Cape Verde. And da Gama, after a bout of piracy and clueless what to do, came across an Indian merchant in Mombassa who took him to Calicut. These European "explorers" didn't understand the concept of longitude and
when da Gama saw the ease with which Indians crossed the ocean, he simply threw his equipment away and replaced it with that of Indian. By the way, in 1511, these people came across a Majapahit map. Cape of Good Hope was already in that!!
Let me bite the bullet then. Anyone, feel free to pick the topic.
Kurwai: Kurwai troops led by it's crown prince Izzat Khan was a part of Holkar troop. He either rebelled on field or defected - Abdali felicitated him.
He died of injuries soon after and on the other hand, Holkar invaded Kurwai and severely chastised it's ruling line.
Punjab:
Here, Marathas were completely out of picture and the subsequent decades ended up as running fights between Afghans and the kingdoms supporting them in India, and the Sikhs.
The 600s Tang campaigns which genocided Agni and imposed Chinese rule on the Tarim Basin were the decisive blow for Indic influence and culture in Tarim Basin. The implication of it was not actually lost on the locals.
Led by Khotan, a kind of pacificst Buddhism was dominant in the area(its military power broken, and with Tibet and Arabs breathing down it's neck, there is only that much they can do).
A few centuries after the Chinese advances, an Uyghur Khan was asked why doesn't he convert to Buddhism. He replied, Buddhism teaches compassion and a king can never afford to be compassionate. His successors converted to Islam.
Bangladeshis posted an image today of a headless Mahadeva, right? Shall I tell you the story of Mamarak Khan or Mubarak Khan, one of the last great commanders of Karrani Dynasty? He was sacrificed to Mahadeva himself. That was one of the last gasps of Muslim power of Bengal and
it ended up a Mughal province for the centuries to come. So, Mamarak Khan's story goes thus.
After a major defeat at Chatogram in the hands of Bijaya Manikya, the Pathans ruling the area fled to Bengal and petitioned Suleiman Karrani.
Suleiman Karrani sent his brother in law Mamarak Khan with a large army on Tripura. Chatogram was taken back but the Sylhet front under Kala Nazir held. Bijaya Manikya sent reinforcements which fought for eight months but didn't achieve success.
Again, an old topic. Mahmud of Ghazni and Somnath. What is the sequence of events? Mahmud, who was known for his physical ugliness according to chronicles got his window of opportunity to pillage India proper after the collapse of Shahi enterprise.
So, by 1026, he has decided to pick one of the prized temples of India as a glorious conclusion of his career - Somnath. Accordingly, he entered India through Punjab and skirting the desert, crashed on Somnath. Except for people like Romila Thapar,
there is a historic consensus - the place was pillaged thoroughly after a brutal massacre, and the fragments of the shattered idol were taken back. Here starts the confusion. Mahmud didn't return by the way he came back but tried to force his way through the impossible desert -
In 1542, Vijayanagara fought the Bahmanid coalition and defeated it. It was a massive battle and sensing a window, the three brothers - Ramaraya split the army into three and he along with his brothers Tirumala and Venkatadri marched in three directions chasing the big three - Ramaraya went on Golconda, Tirumala on Ahmednagar and Venkatadri on Bijapur.
Venkatadri clashed with the fleeing troops at Adoni, Kurakacherla and Manuva - in fact, Asad Khan who was holding Adoni abandoned the fort - while he fled with a select troop to raid Venkatadri's camp, he ordered the garrison to join the Adil Shah and Barid Shah.
He attacked Venkatadri's camp in the night and pillaged it - even to the extent of taking families hostage but was severely defeated. After this, he captured Amir Barid and overran Bidar. With Bidar collapsing, Adil Shah had no option but to flee even faster -