Just once, I'd like to read a McWhorter column fashioned out of something other than straw. This one is a master class in question begging.
For the record, I agree that making people feel guilty is not a great approach to anti-racism, but the piece assumes that making whites feel guilty - specifically for things in the past - is an explicit goal of anti-racist movements. This isn't true.
"Feeling bad" about what happened in the past is not the same thing as assigning or engendering guilt. I feel bad about the Tulsa Race Massacre. I feel bad that our public higher education system was established in a way to purposefully exclude Black students.
While I feel bad about that stuff, I don't feel any guilt because I wasn't around for it, had no agency in the outcome, and also don't have a time machine that would allow me to go back and intervene at the origins of those problems.
What I do feel, based on the knowledge I have of these systemic inequities, is a sense of responsibility to try to address these problems so that subsequent generations of people are not subject to the same structural barriers. Responsibility and guilt aren't synonyms.
The idea that progress can only be made if enough white people feel guilty is not a principle I'm aware of in the anti-racist readings and movements I've come in contact with. Maybe it exists. It is not the core of the movement.
The idea that the impulse to act to address injustice comes out of guilty about what happened in the past is not supported by any evidence. McWhorter's reading of the Civil Rights era is...odd.
I know that structural racism exists because I have witnessed it in the world I'm most familiar with, education. @AdamHSays traces the roots of these problems in higher education in his brilliant new book. bookshop.org/a/1793/9780062…
As @AdamHSays notes, Auburn had more Black students 20 years ago than it does today. The percentage of Black tenured faculty has barely budged. The causes can be found in the exclusions of Black people at the origination of these institutions.
Nobody needs to feel guilty about this, but a failure to recognize it and an unwillingness to try to do something about it is complicity in perpetuating an injustice. If people believe the rhetoric of higher ed institutions as places of opportunity, this must be addressed.
Does that make me "woke?" Who gives a shit? This is a tangible problem doing daily harm to people. We know the problem and have identified solutions. I don't feel guilty. I'm angry.
In his new column, @jbouie captures my personal sentiments well. If Black students have to encounter racism, white students should at least have to learn about it. nytimes.com/2021/10/30/opi…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Despite being an amateur Brooks-ologist, I had never seen this piece by @sissenberg that brilliantly takes Brooks seriously enough to show how ridiculous he is. I can't believe we've been blighted with this guy's opinions for so long. h/t @KevinMKrusephillymag.com/news/2004/04/0…
Brooks' response when @sissenberg calls him to ask about some of the uh...made up shit he puts in his writing is very telling about how Brooks see himself unique privileged as someone who somehow gets to tell truths with what are actually lies.
I've spent a lot of time being irritated by Brooks, but also believing he's essentially harmless, but I think there's a line between @sissenberg's coverage of Brooks 15+ years ago to today's Substack warrior culture where the best $'s is in reflecting what people already believe.
Higher ed leaders say student mental health is their number one concern according to this @ACEducation survey. If that's true, there's things that can be done. /thread. acenet.edu/News-Room/Page…
One thing is to confront how the very structure and practice of "schooling" has created a generation (or two) for whom school itself is their primary source of stress. The way we "school" students is a big part of the problem itself. insidehighered.com/blogs/just-vis…
Asking everyone to do MORE is not a solution to the problem of student mental health. This includes requiring students to add a "mindfulness" practice to their array of responsibilities. Remove the stressor, rather than trying to cope with a fundamentally bad situation.
Having used Rufo to drive a wedge into the culture with ginned up B.S., the more mainstream conservative education reformers start to edge away. thedispatch.com/p/the-right-wa…
Let's not get too excited. The same piece is filled with B.S. about anti-racist pedagogy/CRT/etc..., but it appears to recognize that the push has the potential to become a political liability. Do I think this is a principled stand? Please....it's about power, always.
If there were any principle behind it, they would've resisted Rufo from the beginning, but he was useful for a time. Now, they're going to start to insist they barely knew the guy.
The status quo system of higher education in the country is diseased. Requiring institutions to compete with each other in order to enroll students to capture their tuition dollars is fundamentally destructive. wsj.com/articles/biden…
Four-year schools lobby against free community college because it may hurt 4-yr schools' revenue. This is rotten stuff, but it's primarily a problem of a system that makes chasing revenue paramount.
Carol Christ, current chancellor of Cal-Berkeley put it plainly: "Colleges and universities are fundamentally in the business of enrolling students for tuition dollars." This is an operations mindset and it dominates higher ed because under the current structure, it has to.
What's striking about the analysis is how the bullshit flows freely among the various levels, from an anti-semitic grifter, to a right wing activist huckster, and even a NYTimes columnist. Honestly can't see a way out of this. Depressing.
Like in an example @donmoyn discusses in the post, when Marc Lamont Hill demolishes the anti-semitic grifter in a televised segment, the response from the grifter is, "See he DOES know so much about this, just like I said." B.S. on top of B.S.
Holy smokes! This just broke my irony meter. Imagine this guy cautioning against monomania when he's been writing the same stuff for the last 6 years. Professor, heal thyself!
Not to mention publishing your caution against monomania in the publication that runs the same article over and over again.