...and yes, I do find this photo hilarously nerdly. And am just gonna riff off it here.
It was drilled into my head in organic chemistry that "carbon can only have four bonds" and "Haha, you drew a pentavalent carbon! That is WRONG! Points off!"
But...it can have five bonds!
And how that works is very interesting, and maybe one of the most important things in the Universe for organic chemistry.
Carbon can have 4 sp3 hybridized orbitals around it in tetrahedral geometry. But, if you stick a proton on it, it can rearrange.
CH4 is definitely Not Happy about being protonated. But if it can't play "hot potato" with the proton and give it to something else (think vacuum, deep space), the methan carbon is stuck with it and has to deal with being CH5+. At least temporarily.
So what does it look like?
It looks like this. The carbon atom still has 4-sp3 orbitals, tetrahedral geometry. But one of the sp3 orbitals is now in a 3-center 2-electron bond with effectively side-bound H2. A little triangle with 2 electrons buzzing around in there somewhere.
(oh man that drawing looks terrible. Sorry about that y'all.)
That positively charged "pentavalent carbon" is what happens in a mass spec system in positive mode with saturated hydrocarbon molecules in that don't have anywhere else to protonate. (your TA prolly never thought of that, now did they?)
This sort of thing also happens in planetary atmospheres where methane (very common molecule in Universe) gets stuck with a proton. That happens in planetary atmospheres where there is a lot of hydrogen also. (Because of H3+, but that's a whole 'nother story....) Jupiter, etc...
CH5+ mildly boring, just runs around and transfers protons. (It is Not Happy, and will shove that proton based on proton affinities.) Here is a handy chart:
So, looking at chart, any protonated H2 (= H3+, a 3c,2e- little triangle of hydrogen nuclei), gonna shove a proton onto methane if it can bump into it, and methane gonna shove off onto ethylene if it can find it, and any N or O atom is gonna get stuck with that proton.
But there's a side story where stuff gets REALLY INTERESTING. If you have a planetary atmosphere (or galactic cloud I guess) that doesn't have a lot of H3+ and that can do a proton transfer to methane, what happens?
Where you don't have a bunch of H2, and you have Ar or N2, (think Pluto or Titan way upper atmosphere) then UV radiation ionizes those, and then they react with CH4, steal an electron (reform Ar or N2), create a spare proton (H+) and generate CH3+.
CH3+ does stuff.
CH5+ pretty boring. If you drop an electron into that system (if it recombines in Titan upper atmosphere with electrons running around). It'll make .CH3 radical. (branching ratio 0.7)
Some chemists think .CH3 radical is "exciting", but in relative terms, it's pretty boring.
In contrast, CH3+ is very exciting. If you drop an electron into that system?
Whoo-boy! stuff goes down! 0.4 branching ratio to :CH2 carbene (whoa!) 0.3 branching ratio to .:CH carbyne (whoa! whoa!) 0.3 branching ratio to nekkid :C: ready to rock-and-roll and shred (OMG!!)
What does :CH2 methylene carbene do? Yeah, they don't teach you that stuff in introductory organic chemistry. Carbene chemistry is next level powerful stuff.
Think of it as acting more like an electron-defiencient metal. C-H insertions, [1+2]cycloadditions.
Metal chemistry!
And those CH3+ reactions build serious unsaturated molecules, then go on to build even more complex organic stuff. acetylene, benzene, naphthalene. On a planetary scale, most original really complex hydrocarbon molecules may have started with CH3+. CH5+ is the boring pathway.
So the CH5+ / CH3+ story is really key to understanding organic chemistry in the universe.
Hoping y'all enjoyed this thread, and maybe it might gain you a few arguments you can use on your TA to win back some organic chemistry exam points.
(and if it makes your TA stop repeating the tired old dogma that "carbon can never have more that 4 things bonded to it" then I have attained my goal.)
Details of CH5+ and CH3+ in planetary atmospheres (paywall, sorry)
Imanaka and Smith, "EUV Photochemical Production of Unsaturated Hydrocarbons: Implications to EUV Photochemistry in Titan and Jovian Planets". J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 42, 11187–11194. pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.102…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Astronomy and Astrology are pretty much the same thing.”
And with that, I’ve pretty much pissed off every amateur and professional astronomer. But, there are really strong and provable connections.
Strap in for a long thread, and a wild ride. [1/n]
(with side links to explore)
Astronomy makes observation of the heavens, and predicts/explains physical properties and timing of those objects.
Astrology makes observations of the heavens, and predicts/explains spiritual or human-centered properties and timing.
(Starting data same, applications different.)
Looking at history, astronomy and astrology pretty much the same until 1700's, when the Science and beliefs kinda split out. Astrology goes way back. Prolly every culture had their own “sky-watcher” to look at heavens and figure out what to do.
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeoas…)
This comes from the company that I (and many others) helped found, back in 2000-ish. I was not directly involved in this, but my colleagues (led by a former post-doc of mine) made this happen.
I sat in on some of the meetings, and worked for the same client (Merck) on parallel projects.
This started as a modified derivative of a natural product molecule called enfumafungin.
I learned something today in #astrobiology that just totally blew my mind.
There are microbes that eat....air. And can live on just....air.
[thread]
These microbes live in cold deserts...I mean really brutal cold deserts. Barren rocky ridges (not even tundra) in Antarctica.
There's really no free water - very dry. And dark for 6 months, too. So these microbes live where there isn't enough water for photosynthesis producers.
They live on the trace amounts hydrogen gas (H2) in the atmosphere (about 190 parts per BILLION), and CO (20 parts per BILLION). So these things are living on tiny tiny tiny amounts of stuff.
But...they are still living.
@mikamckinnon@SiO2moyer@justinboldaji Carlsbad and Lechuguilla Caves have a really wierd and fascinating geology history. They were made by bacteria!
@mikamckinnon@SiO2moyer@justinboldaji The story goes like this. Gypsum laid down. Then...thick thick limestone laid down on top of that. Way way down deep, microbes eat gypsum, H2S bubbles up. (Microbes reduce sulfate). ((there might be other ways H2S bubbles up.)) That gets H2S percolating up into the limestone.
@mikamckinnon@SiO2moyer@justinboldaji Then, up higher in the limestone layers, there are places where oxygen in water mixes with H2S charged waters. Some bacteria love this! They can eat H2S in the water and combine with O2 in the water and get energy!!!
They pee out sulfuric acid! (H2SO4)
Did you ever want to take up vegetable gardening, but worried you didn't have a green thumb?
Read on. (Thread).
(Looks like we are all in for the Long haul. So a hobby whee you grow your own food seems like a timely idea...)
Why am I qualified to talk about this?Well, before I came to JPL I grew about 30% of my food for several years.
I wasn't a hobby, it was an obsession.
And I had spreadsheets.
I grew berries, fruits, summer crops, winter crops. All of it.
My spreadsheet had over 1000 entries.
And I can tell you all my mistakes and have you harvesting your own food in about a month.