I am teaching Xunzi's discourse on music next week for my philosophy of mind class (all less commonly taught philosophical traditions), and pairing that with psychology of music, notably Xunzi's adage that "music is joy" 1/
Xunzi was a Warring States philosopher approx living in the 3rd C BCE. He argued for the importance of human artifice (偽) in achieving goodness, things like ritual, music, and poetry. He said 其善者偽也 (what's good in people is their artifice) 2/
Xunzi held that human nature is bad, because our innate tendencies will cause us to conflict with others, these include
• fondness for profit -> struggle
• hate and dislike -> cruelty
• desires of eyes and ears -> lasciviousness and chaos 3/
The Mohists argued that music is wasteful. Xunzi objects to them: the sage-kings realized that we need to give expression to our emotions and so they created music, especially the canonical collection of the Odes (Shi 詩). 4/
Hence the Xunzi begins
“Music is joy, an unavoidable human disposition.”
It’s unavoidable that people feel joy (and certainly not bad!) but if it’s not properly expressed/channeled people will fall into chaos and disorder. So we need to channel it properly, through music 5/
Xunzi thinks the Sage Kings invented music with the express purpose of harmony
He examines situations where music is performed
• For political officials in the ancestral temple
• At home in the family
• in the village
• in military campaigns 6/
He observes that in all these situations, music creates proper harmony and in military rouses us to action. Now, how can music have this influence in politics, the family, the village, and the military? Xunzi says it is because music deeply transforms us 7/
Xunzi describes how music affects us "The phenomena of sounds and music are these: The drum is great
and magnificent. The bell is expansive and full. The stone chimes are restrained and orderly. The yu, sheng, xiao, he, guan, and yue are energetic and vibrant.... 8/
" The xun and chi are rolling and undulating. The
se is serene and relaxed. The qin is soft and gentle. Song is pure and penetrating." -- put in contemporary terms, music has what Rietveld calls "affective allure", it rouses and moves us irresistibly. 9/
Just like donning certain garments can put you in a mood, music can do that too, so Xunzi: "Thus, the mourning garments and the sounds of weeping make people’s hearts sad. To strap on armor, don a helmet, and sing in the ranks makes people’s hearts emboldened." 11/
Interesting parallels between Xunzi and music and theories on the psychology of music, notably Joel Krueger's theory of musical affordance here (open access) frontiersin.org/articles/10.33… 12/
Joel Krueger observes (a well established phenomenon) that people listen to music to manage their mood, to animate behavior, cultivate and refine affective experiences (“musicking” in Krueger’s paper), but draws intriguing conclusions from this... 13/
Notably, music offers us affordances--things in our environment we can respond to in an embodied way. Much like a couch invites us to slouch in, and a chair to sit in upright, music can help us to modulate our mood in a certain way 14/
So music invites us to move (tapping your finger, bobbing your head), not just movement but synchronous movement, in tune w the music and others, and affective too, getting in the groove of the music 15/
Drawing on extended mind hypothesis (Clark and others) Krueger goes on to argue that music not only helps us to manage our moods, it can *create* complex emotions and expand our emotional and affective ways that would not be possible without it 16/
"Musical expressions of emotions can have, for instance, increased complexity, temporal range, subtlety, and force in contrast to their non-musical counterparts. These properties help to explain why, when listening attentively to a piece of music, we often feel as though ..."17/
"we have temporarily accessed a realm of feeling and expression that somehow goes beyond that of our everyday non-musical life; it also helps explain why musical expressions of emotion can seem simultaneously familiar and alien.” /18
Now this is super-interesting and ties in with Xunzi, who likewise thinks that human nature (our inborn dispositions) are relatively fixed BUT that we have artifice (wei, culture) with which we can expand and "beautify" ourselves, surmount or limitations 19/
Ritual, music and poetry are such ways to expand ourselves. They are external but they also reflect inward, expanding our range of emotional responses and refining them. This is why it is so important for Xunzi we listen to *the right* music /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵on Marie Anne Lavoisier, mother of modern chemistry. Her husband Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier was central to chemical revolution & discovery of role of oxygen in chemical processes.
Marie Anne's contribution is less well-known.
This painting of them recently was in the news 1/
The painting (by J-L David) was in the news for a peculiar reason.
Conservators found out the painting was edited: originally Marie Anne wore a hat! And there were no scientific instruments on the table. I'll come to reasons for these edits in a bit 2/ news.artnet.com/art-world/hidd…
What is less known is that Marie Anne was a chemist in her own right. She worked together with her husband in the lab, making meticulous notes of experiments. She even translated works in early chemistry for him from English (Antoine could not read English) 3/
The Enlightenment, which followed bitter religious wars, was concerned the question of how to have public conversations (including disagreement) where the validity of arguments is centered.
Enlightenment was very concerned with limits of rationality too.
Relevant today! 1/
(background: I am listening to this very interesting podcast.
Concern with how to argue well in all sorts of domains: politics, religion, art, etc.
Enlightenment authors were concerned with wider education of the public, and public discourse. 2/
Karen O'Brien mentions that J-J Rousseau, who argued that women ought only to be educated so they could be more useful to men was actually going against the grain, the emerging Enlightenment consensus was on women's education as important for women. 3/
A counterfactual question that's hard to evaluate but here goes anyway: if Lynn White Jr is right, then without Christianity would our environmental crisis now be less severe (climate change, habitat loss, species loss, collapse of entire groups of organisms)?
Lynn White Jr was a Christian his entire life! He wrote trenchant critiques about how Christians were co-responsible for the ecological crisis.
He believed St Francis of Assisi would be a good role model (here's my pic of St Francis, model: @BlakeHereth1)
Here is the fascinating history of Lynn White Jr giving the talk that would eventually end up as "The historical roots of our ecological crisis". chesapeakequarterly.net/V15N3/main1/
Yay! We can submit to @UncannyMagazine again, they reopen soon. I've backed this project because I love the magazine--you can still support it. Also, if you pledge a lot @Wiswell will write a blogpost on a horror movie of your choice! kickstarter.com/projects/lynne…
I'm going to do a thread on Bernard De Fontenelle's Plurality of Worlds (1686), a series of dialogues between a Marquise and a philosopher that offers a startling and disorienting vision of a myriad of inhabited worlds 1/
I recommend listening to this subtle performance of Marin Marais' Voix Humaines while you read this thread, performed by Brandon Acker and Craig Trompeter 2/
We have dialogues over five evenings between a philosopher and a Marquise. At the time that de Fontenelle wrote, it was unusual to have a woman feature in a philosophical dialogue. Women were commonly thought to be inferior to men (in virtue, physical ability, intelligence) 3/
Castiglione's Courtier (1528) is such a fun read. Highly recommend (I read it in my teens, but now I am a trained philosopher and I can appreciate it even better). So lively and full of zest, with engaging characters in philosophical dialogue, all at the hip court of Urbino.
Also, there are so few philosophical books in Etiquette anymore (the chief topic of the Courtier, though it also deals with philosophy of gender, political philosophy, and even philosophy of sports). I can only think of Amy Olberding's Wrong of Rudeness as a recent example. 2/
If you look at past philosophy, you can find a huge literature on Etiquette, for example
* The Analects
* The Xunzi
* Erasmus' Good manners for children
* Castiglione's book of the courtier
* Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning Education
(among many others). 3/