First you need to download the Reads referenced in the paper. PRJNA605983. This is an NCBI accession number for a BioProject that will lead you to many SRR#s related to the samples within the BioProject.
You will need 4 open source software tools that run in Linux/Ubuntu.
SRAtoolkit -Downloads reads from NCBI
samtools- general file I/O
Trim_galore- Trims reads of adaptors
bwa mem- Maps reads to a reference.
You will need lots of disk space.
Once you have SRAtoolkit installed, you can use fastq-dump.
kevinmc$ fastq-dump --accession SRR11092057
you will get 2 fastq files (16Gb each). You can us --gzip to download compressed and the next steps can work with zipped files.
Next step is to Trim the Illumina adapters off the sequence. Every Target DNA molecule has primer sequences adapted to them for PCR and Sequencing. Need to remove them before alignment to a ref.
This leaves you with some large files and a few report files itemizing how aggressively it trimmed the reads.
Final step is to map these reads against Nipah Virus.
You will need to download this genome accession number.
The Quay paper is good for this. They reproduced the original short preprint paper. I wanted to reproduce this with different tools to ensure it's legit.
AY988601.1
The Quay paper is good read. They went deeper on this problem and found more smoke.
What do we see?
If you want to visualize a BAM file you will need to index the file and use IGV to open it.
samtools index AY_WIV_x_Nipah.bam
Not only are reads found that map to many parts of the Nipah virus, the reads that map to the end of the virus have novel sequence.
The read mapping profile across the genome reproduces Quay et al.
Quay et al, noticed the reads that map to the ends of the virus had novel sequence on them that matched a cloning vector. This is evidence WIV is probably performing GOF on Nipah virus and that the patient may not have been infected by Nipah but that the lab is dirty.
Here is an example of reads that reach into the cloning vector at the end of the virus. The lower reads boxed in red are paired end reads where the reverse read doesn't land on the reference. A BLAST of these unanchored paired reads hits deep into the cloning vector. Makes sense.
Internal regions of the virus also have regions like this which is odd. Need to dig more here.
This is solid Evidence that WIV is gambling with even more deadly viruses. They need to explain this mess. The people that funded them to do this have a lot to answer for.
The take home message. WIV is handling BL4 viruses and cant seem to keep them from getting into BL2 sequencing projects. Its a mess.
Fauci is funding this work by laundering the money through a fall guy. DARPA rejected funding this work as it was too dangerous. Doesnt stop Fauci
He just finds a few loop holes through the regs he authored and sends it to a sweat shop in China that can't keep their chocolate from getting in their peanut butter.
It probably helps that his wife is on the Ethics committee.
It is well known from BioNtech (Lenk et al) and Sutton et al (1997) that RNA:DNA hybrids inhibit DNaseI.
What is less known is that Quadruplex Gs also inhibit DNaseI. Some exist in SV40 and we get the most signal from this qPCR amplicon.
2 Different mechanisms of DNaseI inhibition = plasmid fragmentation cannot be assumed to be uniform in the mRNA vaccines. Hence 100 fold more spike than parts of the vector.
Below is a map of the codon optimized spike where Quadruplex Gs are overlaid with GAA repeats. GAA's are stickier RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our qPCR primers are overlayed as well.
@RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @TracyBethHoeg @DrJBhattacharya
Evans et al demonstrate DNaseI is resistant to quadruplex Gs. They also move to alternative enzymes. nature.com/articles/s4152…
This is from Lenk et al (BioNtech).
Note the concern over GAA sequences and RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our spike qPCR primers happen to land on GAA rich and quadruplex G rich regions of Spike. frontiersin.org/journals/molec…
@LocasaleLab I find the RNAi worship incongruent will how that entire field was ignored when injecting billions of people with mRNAs.
There are multiple 21bp homologies to human that emerged from the haphazard codon optimizations in the modRNA vaccine and no one cared?
@LocasaleLab Receipts.
Take Pfizers vax Sequence and run it through BLAT.
Hello... anyone from the RNAi space want to speak up about this?
On Veterans Day @CharlesRixey @JesslovesMJK
Stopped by MGC.
2 long days later we had all of his data.
It’s now published in The Journal of Independent Medicine.
It describes the mechanism of failure for the DNA contamination in the mRNA shots and why the regulators are missing it.
@JesslovesMJK @CharlesRixey @weldeiry @KUPERWASSERLAB @RetsefL @DrJBhattacharya @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @TracyBethHoeg
Another Achs et al Fumble uncovered.
These folks don't even understand Capillary Electrophoresis.
Its becoming increasingly clear these are not honest mistakes but designed to deceive by people who are employed at a Vaccine Research Institute.
Science for Sale.
@JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher
Here is the Rub.
They used a CE instrument that has a lower limit of sensitivity above the 10ng limit.
You need to be able to pick up 10X below the 10ng limit. Or 33pg/ul (300ul dose @ 10ng = 33pg/ul)
This is embarrassingly rigged or they are incompetent.
They ignored our comments on the preprint server and raced their paper into @Nature.
@JesslovesMJK and @DJSpeicher have their own substacks picking up other errors in this paper I'll post sortly.