Q: What has resulted in India's campaign turning out the way it has so far? Is it the uncontrollables - toss & decks getting better to bat in the second innings?
No doubt they have played a role. But you can
@IndianMourinho only completely shift the blame to that if you got the controllables right. India didn't do that.
India vs spin in WC 2021:
16-0-76-3 - that's not even 5 RPO. And India are a subcontinental team. Even if they are set back by pace, they should be able to reconstruct innings
@IndianMourinho at 7-7.5 against spin. At 7.5, that would be a difference of 44 extra runs the bowlers could have had.
There was plenty of evidence that this batting unit was going to struggle against spin even ahead of the start of the tournament.
This comment sums it up all. Look at the
@IndianMourinho conclusion that was arrived at after looking at the numbers of 3 of India's biggest batters:
At least in the first game, two of them were opening - one way to minimize the potential damage. In the second, Rohit and Kohli were positioned at 3 & 4 -
@IndianMourinho - two positions that demand your most skillful players/hitters of spin.
Instead of splitting them with left-handers and/or better players of spin, India lined them up like lambs to slaughter.... and well, got slaughtered.
Except, however, for India it didn't. They fed him to pace, lost him, and
@IndianMourinho and then came out of Powerplay with two of their weakest attackers of spin facing Santner and Sodhi at a venue that provides some assistance for them and had big boundaries.
If Kane Williamson was asked to set the innings up after PP in a way it suits them, he would have gone
@IndianMourinho 35/2 in 6 with KL and Ishan dismissed and Kohli and Rohit at the crease looking at each other in shock at having to accelerate against spin.
The shots they played were a result of it.
On Bhuvneshwar Kumar:
If you back out from something you were very confident of after one result that doesn't go your way, you are either admitting you have got it wrong all along or just gone into a panic mode and reacting as a result.
Be it fitness wise or on numbers, there
was, again, enough evidence that this move was going to cost him.
India could keep the same XI, in the same order, and ace the rest of the group games, but if they want to tap all that they have out of their batters, the order should be:
Rohit
Kohli
SKY
Pant
KL
Hardik
Jadeja
What it does:
@IndianMourinho Taps into Kohli's PP value
Gives India an added dimension of range vs pace down the order in the form of KL, in addition to power vs pace that they already have
Pushes SKY up to a role he would be more comfortable at, where his value vs spin and PP pace kicks in
@IndianMourinho But there is a catch: at the moment if you introduce spin in PP, KL (Ind) tries to take them down. Pairing Rohit and Kohli will force one of them to go out of their way and weaken each other.
That's fine because the benefits far outweigh the disadvantage.
Offspin vs West Indies: West Indies have time and again relied on a sole right-hander to split a slew of left-handers and counter off-spin. Simply put, they need more than one - be it Simmons & Chase or Holder & Chase or Pollard at 4
@IndianMourinho and Chase as opener, they just need more than 1 in the first 12-15 overs.
Chase's innings: 6 balls into his innings, Chase was on strike the first ball of the 4th over vs Mahedi Hasan. He took an intended single and moved to the other end, which exposed Gayle to his biggest
@IndianMourinho weakness and got him out. As the sole right-hander, that's the exact opposite of what he was supposed to do.
But I think there is a reason for it. The management might be expecting him to do the classic anchoring role, where irrespective of who bowls and what is bowled,