I'm a little surprised that @DavidAFrench still doesn't realize that this "definition" he keeps using is not in the least authoritative and was NOT created or approved by UCLA School of Public Affairs.
The truth is, it comes from a group of UCLA students who had organized a 1/
The truth is, it comes from a group of UCLA students who had organized a 1/
https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1454915909835952135
2/ course on “Critical Race Studies” in 2009. The slightest research would have revealed this. See spacrs.wordpress.com/history/ for the proper background.
But it's par for the course with these guys' on CRT. I don't know if it's hubris or just age old White supremacy, they just don't
But it's par for the course with these guys' on CRT. I don't know if it's hubris or just age old White supremacy, they just don't
3/ want to do the homework before authoritatively pronouncing.
I suppose French could claim, as he did in last year's piece, that he was trained in CRT in college 30 years ago because all of his professors at Harvard were CRT.
frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/on-the-use-a…
I suppose French could claim, as he did in last year's piece, that he was trained in CRT in college 30 years ago because all of his professors at Harvard were CRT.
frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/on-the-use-a…
4/4 But I'm pretty sure EVERY CRT founder would be GREATLY surprised by this claim, hahaha. (Is he confusing CRT with CLS? Or confusing it w/ Legal Realist approach broadly?)
At any rate, yet another piece by the "good conservatives" that demonstrates continued lack of study.
At any rate, yet another piece by the "good conservatives" that demonstrates continued lack of study.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
