Expansionary fiscal policy wasn't orthodoxy on the left until the 1930s and 40s, many people forget this.

Before Roosevelt turned towards Keynesianism, he said you ''...can't get something for nothing.''

Rudolf Hilferding and the SPD thought large deficit spending was utopian.
I can't completely blame them for the skepticism, it was a new idea at the time and many people would've rather stuck with the tried and true rather than titanic financial experiments.
To be clear, the SPD wasn't against social spending. The Ebert-Hilferding finance ministry increased social welfare spending.

But they tried to balance the budget most of the time.
I think the SPD even called their fiscal and monetary policy, ''sound finance socialism.''

Absolutely degenerate phrase by modern standards, but most people didn't realize how wrong it was back then.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tristam the Social Democrat (Pietro Nenni stan)🌹

Tristam the Social Democrat (Pietro Nenni stan)🌹 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TristamPratori1

2 Nov
The profit motive (that is, the *exclusive* use of *limited* resources for personal benefit) is a remnant of prior economic systems that were predicated on scarcity.

We also know that ideologies favoring hierarchy and (e.g right-wing ones) are based on a scarcity mentality.
Social classes and economic inequality are not inevitable, they are the result of underlying methods that humanity uses to produce for its survival.
We can see that humanity becomes more egalitarian as production resources develop and become more abundant.

The move from feudalism based on *scarce* natural resources (such as land) to capitalism based on *abundant* reproduced resources (machines) reduced many hierarchies.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(