Sorry to throw cold water on this but Nick Clegg is an absolutely worthless speaker unless it’s in a deposition under oath. They’re literally giving the stage to a PR exec covering for his bosses representing a company with zero remaining trust and credibility.
On a related note, same applies to Andrew Bosworth… asking him some questions about the whistleblower docs as an obligatory setup to discussing metaverse is not really appropriate in today’s context. /2
A simple question for Bosworth would be pinning him down on what Joseph Chancellor did while assigned to his division of the company, what they knew when and why Facebook covered-up his entire involvement. /3
Or ask him about the lies in his “leaked memo” in 2019 in light of the channel 4 documentary that came out in the Fall of 2020. /4
And I wouldn’t allow name “Alex Schultz” to just be glossed over in the context of the rename of the company. He’s likely at the center of at least one SEC complaint - the dark arts core - in the integrity of the platform, the growth hacking and the downstream harms revealed. /5
Bosworth unchecked but absolutely preposterous statement #1: “we built, as far as I know, the first ranked content feed.” /6
Bosworth unchecked but absolutely preposterous statement #2 “Everything we do is centered around consumers and consumer expectations.” /7
Hello. If CEO Zuckerberg says Facebook was working on the re-brand six months ago that doesn’t make the suggestion they rolled it out to distract the press into a “conspiracy theory” suggesting this discounts their always-offensive PR strategy and decision to press forward. /8
interviewer and Bosworth both characterize news passively as “scrutiny” (of a big company) without even mentioning any details. In the context of “exclusives with Zuckerberg” and leaked re-brand not to mention prior leaks, these inevitably read as access plays. /9
Instead of linking to it, I’m going to bump back up this statement and brave, smart perspective from @AdrienneLaF, “Facebook is acting like a hostile foreign power; it’s time we treated it that way.” theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

2 Nov
We can’t move on - we can’t be gaslit, we can’t let Facebook trade access to the future to change the narrative. Time dropped a new bombshell report overnight on Facebook and India that is a must-read. It’s by Billy Perrigo who has been doing incredible accountability work. /1
Some of the reporting connects back to the whistleblower documents that should still be very much front and center leading to more reporting. Yes, they knew it broke their own policies, more on that at the end. /2
The incidents and videos cited in the Time report have massive numbers of views and absolutely horrific examples of hate and inciting violence many of which have been promoted and provided viral velocity and reach by Facebook’s platform. /3
Read 12 tweets
2 Nov
New report on Facebook’s role in enabling, amplifying and providing velocity and reach to climate-denial misinformation. /1
Deep in this morning’s report you learn how the funding of this misinformation flows through Google to the tune of possibly $5 million in six months. /2
This of course reminds me of DCN’s letter (businessinsider.com/dcn-letter-to-…) to Google and Facebook now nearly six years ago. /3
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
Stop. Please. Retweeting and dunking still serves to distract. Here is the reality - their market power and abuse were already evident before we saw evidence they knew about the harms. That includes January 6th insurrection and this highly questionable testimony this morning. 1/2
Global press is shining sunlight on how they serve to promote and accelerated the spread of harms. It’s critically important to focus on market power otherwise as in the past they’ll not be able to speak to the harms months later. /2
According to this evidence, Facebook put 4% of its profits towards safety and security. That’s $13B in five years compared to $275 Billion in profits. And that’s advertisers knowingly funding a platform that causes these harms. /3
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
Threading thoughts from UK Parliament hearing with social media platforms. First up is Facebook including Antigone Davis who testified a few weeks ago to US Senate. @DamianCollins is already drilling down on FB's research very much exposing Facebook's negligence and spinning. /1
MP Collins did a breathtaking job in unpacking the issues, the lack of answers to accountability. Here is how he closed revealing only 4% of Facebook's $275B in profits went toward safety and security. Watch for the drink of the water glass. It’s a facebook tell. /2
This was after @DamianCollins probed on where decision making actually happens. In 2018, all answers were “the buck stops with Mark.” Now with the SEC complaints and plethora of lawsuits about governance, control, insider trading, it seems Facebook’s talking point went vague. /3
Read 18 tweets
28 Oct
As we await 10am ET hearing with Facebook execs, three highlights from @mariaressa yesterday before the same committee. “…Move fast break things doesn’t work in the real world when your product insidiously manipulates people’s minds…” important questions on Facebook’s role. 1/3
Critically important point why Facebook would prefer lawmakers, journalists, public, debate content moderation, taking down, leaving up, when real concern should be market power, data, algorithmic amplification and how Facebook microtargets and filters content to audiences. 2/3
And why Nobel Peace Prize winner @mariaressa is a critical voice and a treasure who has acted as a beacon of light for those who seek to grow trust, protect democracy, and hold the line on press freedom so that we can we return more justice into the world. 3/3
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
OK, US media, attention y’all. History lesson. In 2018-19, a parliamentary committee and chair was deceived by Facebook policy team kicking off FB’s most difficult period. Their vital work often didn’t get US coverage.
This same chair has must-watch hearing at 10a ET today. /1
Over 2yrs, that chair would become one of savviest lawmakers on planet regarding the issues while US Congress also began to get educated on them. @DamianCollins was smart enough on the issues that Zuckerberg and Sandberg refused summons on both sides of Atlantic to avoid him. /2
Their committee work was methodical yet broad enough to uncover facts, deeply probing and collaborative across parties leading to recommended changes in legislation now on the table and being examined by a joint select committee chaired by - you guessed it - MP Collins. /3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(