Thread by @eugyppius1

Those UK Health Security Agency vaxx surveillance reports showing massively higher rates of infection in most vaxxed age groups are coming under heavy fire. May not be long for this world.

dailymail.co.uk/health/article…

LMAO "the Office of Statistics Regulation ruled the UKHSA needs to more effectively highlight how behavioural differences could have skewed the figures"

They don't like the numbers but they're still flailing trying to find some minimally plausible reason to pretend they're wrong

Just unbelievable statements from "OSR director general Ed Humpherson" here.

He says recent changes to qualify the data as "unadjusted" are welcome, but "it remains the case that the ... report includes rates ... which can be used to argue that vaccines are not effective"

Anytime you year that vaxx protect against illness/ death because the UKHSA reports show lower incidence of both in the vaxxed, throw this line at them. According to OSR director Humpherson, nobody should be misled into thinking vaxx surveillance tells you anything about efficacy

Humpherson is one of the most completely stupid people on earth. He thinks the differences are down to behaviour. 100% higher rates of infection in vaccinated (where all of the most cautious Covid hysterics are congregated) is down to the unvaxxed hiding under their beds.

No sooner has Humpherson pontificated that the reports are useless for making determinations about efficacy, than we read: "It should be noted that ... the same data set clearly demonstrates the jabs reduce the chance of hospitalisation and death from the virus."

Every line this article is hilarious to me, really a rare treat.

UKHSA is "grateful" to Mr Humpherson for "helping make their report less vulnerable to anti-vaxxers"