G Elliott Morris Profile picture
Nov 2, 2021 20 tweets 7 min read Read on X
🎉Polls are closed in Virginia!

I am running a live election-night model for the governor’s race (similar to the NYT “needle”) and will be posting updates in this thread as results pour in. The model turns on once ~20 precincts report e-day votes & ~5 counties report absentees.
The state elections website (which is publishing statewide returns publicly) is really taking its sweet time. Lagging the networks by quite an amount. But with 3 absentee dumps and results from 107 precincts, reporting jurisdictions show a small shift toward Dems v 2020.
I imagine the model will switch itself on any moment now and then I can send you a screenshot
"any moment now"
The hangup is that we don't have full absentee votes anywhere yet. The model needs or else we're projecting a strong pro-McAuliffe swing in election-day votes to absentees which isn't correct. Need to observe the polarization in both types.
Ok, we're running now! The model isn't going to get information from late mail votes tonight, so it won't be able to call a close race if those are a big chunk, but I'm going to try ignoring them for now and assuming swings in partisan splits are roughly equal statewide
The lay of the land right now is that McAuliffe is underperforming in absentee votes, both in terms of vote share and turnout, and it's enough to cancel out (by a large margin) any increase in Dem election-day vote versus 2020. The promise dashboard chart is coming momentarily
Here's the full model projection now. It thinks Youngkin is on track to win by 2-3 points **though there is large margin of error.** Things typically pan out as expected, but we need to see more election-day precincts from the cities and suburbs (esp in and around Fairfax
The model is stabilizing around Youngkin +3 with 32% of the vote in. Things are close enough and there are enough votes left in Fairfax where McAuliffe could win, but the model sees a pretty likely (70%) R win in Virginia tonight. And a swing to Rs of at least 10 pts either way.
Just to give you an idea of where I'm at qualitatively, I am currently writing our post-VA piece as if Youngkin has won
The only reason my model is not at 100% Youngkin probability now is because there is lot of uncertainty in the absentee ballot predictions as most have not reported yet, especially in the big cities. But the writing is on the wall here. It looks like Rs will go 2-3/3 in VA.
I don't have time to clean up these plots right now, but the story in Virginia is a clear drop-off in turnout in the strongest Democratic areas (esp in absentee voting) and a stronger-than-average swing against them in the exurban places where they have lost ground since ~2012
One thing making precinct-level analysis in VA reallllyyy hard right now is the splitting up of votes at the absentee and election-day level. Makes e-night prediction easy, but muddies up comparisons across years when partisan composition of vote method changes.
The model is still at Youngkin +2.
Confidence intervals narrowing quite quickly now.

A better model would have treated the absentee ballots a little better. I could also have imposed a Bayesian prior on vote shares; obviously, Dems aren't losing the absentee votes in big counties by 50 points.
This could end up closer to Youngkin +4 or +5 at the race absentee votes in Democratic strongholds are falling off. Just clear complacency among Dems for McAuliffe. But also real evidence of sub/exurban vote-swticthing. See scatters here (at the county level).
The model is now telling me to call the contest for Youngkin — which, uh, yeah, is pretty obvious and was from the start. Look how flat those lines are over election night, esp after we started getting returns from Fairfax.
You love to see a working model...
Someone DM'd me for a model update, so here you go. Also attaching a chart comparing McAuliffe's projected margin in the remaining absentee buckets as compared to Biden 2020.
OK, here is my final chart for the night.

Comparing 2021 and 2020 in Virginia, we see disproportionate Democratic drop-off in big cities and evidence of substantial vote-switching among swing voters (or at least among voters in swing counties). Article coming soon.
That chart uses the final predictions from the live-model, made when 98% of the estimated vote was reporting (just a few absentee buckets were outstanding). Point being the comparisons are using complete observations and are as close to final as we’ll get until tomorrow AM.

/END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with G Elliott Morris

G Elliott Morris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gelliottmorris

Jan 25
📊Today 538 is releasing an updated set of our popular pollster ratings for the 2024 general election! Our new interactive presents grades for 540 polling organizations based on their (1) empirical record of accuracy + (2) methodological transparency. 1/n abcnews.go.com/538/best-polls…
There’s tons to say but I’ll hit a few main points. First, a methodological note. For these new ratings, we updated the way 538 measures both *empirical accuracy* and *methodological transparency.* Let me touch on each. (Methodology here: ) abcnews.go.com/538/538s-polls…
Image
(1) *Accuracy.* We now punish pollsters who show routine bias toward one party, regardless of whether they perform better in terms of absolute error. We find that bias predicts future error even if it’s helpful over a short time scale.
Read 19 tweets
Nov 21, 2023
if you want to understand polling today, you have to consider *both* the results and the data-generating process behind them. this is not a controversial statement (or shouldn't be). factors like nonresponse and measurement error are very real concerns stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/resear…
given the research on all the various ways error/bias can enter the DGP, if your defense against "polls show disproportionate shifts among X group. meh" are "well X group voted this way 20 years ago," i am going to weight that pretty low vs concerns about non-sampling error Image
at the same time, if a critical mass of surveys is showing you something ,you should give it a chance to be true. interrogate the data and see if there's something there. i see tendencies both to over-interpret crosstabs and to throw all polls out when they misfire. both are bad
Read 4 tweets
Oct 14, 2023
There is good stuff in this thread, and I’ve been making the first point too for some time. But remember a lot can change in a year, and some of the factors that look big now may not actually matter. Uncertainty is impossibly high this far out.
I took a look yesterday at how much Dem state-lvl POTUS margins tends to change from year to year. It’s about 7pp in our current high-polarization era. That’s a lot! With 2020 as our starting point simulating correlated changes across states, you get p(Biden >= 270) around 60%.
that is obviously not a good place to start if you are team Biden. But the range of outcomes is laughably large—a landslide for either party is more than plausible. So there is a pick your own adventure element to analyses like these: Dobbs, Jan 6 help Ds; Economy, Biden age hurt
Read 6 tweets
May 19, 2023
so, as they say... some personal news
Lots to share, but for now I'll just say FiveThirtyEight was one of the outlets that inspired me to be a data journalist. Nate Silver did great work & the team he led changed political journalism for the better. We will be iterating on that, but we start with a strong foundation.
2/3 ABC and I have been in talks for 6 months to ensure there will be as little disruption as possible in transitioning from the aggregation + forecasting models Silver is taking with him when his contract expires to our new in-house methods, developed w input across ABC & 538.
Read 4 tweets
May 18, 2023
pretty bleak picture for the GOP 10-20 years from now, unless the party changes its policy endorsements and messaging to shrink the gap in Gen Z/Millennial voting behavior catalist.us/whathappened20… Image
yes, however, rolling back convenience voting reforms for students is not going to be an effective voter suppression strategy when the average Gen Z voter is out of school (my back-of-envelope math says this should happen around 2028)
bad tweet!
the point is that crossing your fingers and pretending that young people just get more right-leaning as they age is not an effective electoral strategy,
not that there is a 100% probability of democratic electoral success for the next 30 years
Read 4 tweets
Apr 17, 2023
Just one poll… But IMO pundits are currently running the risk of spinning the proverbial wheel too far against Ron DeSantis in terms of his electability value above Trump (which is declining or completely negated by recent news, according to some accounts)
I do think it is a little early to be writing definitive takes about which GOP candidate would have the best chance against Biden (esp if you don’t do any demographic-lvl vote projections). + there are a lot of factors that are hard to mentally model. With history as our guide… Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(