I always go back to the brilliant book by @sejr_historian, "They Were Her Property: White Women as Slave Owners in the American South."
She says: “Most of us continue to see white women through the lens of gender. This allows for us to be optimistic about the possibility that their gendered oppression will allow for them to find common cause with other dispossessed groups.”
I don't even think this is very complicated or that it should be controversial, but it seems to be for those who subscribe to White feminism.
I think it's because it forces all of us as White women to confront that we benefit from racism, even if we identify as being very much on the left.
Someone else whose work I have been really informed by on this issue and would recommend is @Karnythia. Check out Hood Feminism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's not just that only *one* Black juror has been seated in the trial of the three men charged with killing Ahmaud Arbery.
It's that the judge acknowledged the defense was using *intentional discrimination* in selecting jurors and did nothing about it. cnn.com/2021/11/03/us/…
During jury selection, the defense and prosecution have unlimited challenges for cause - they simply have to show the judge why a juror would not be fair and impartial.
The defense and prosecution each then have a number of peremptory challenges where they can ask for a juror to be struck for any reason.
If RBG taught us anything it is that we have blind faith in liberal icons at our own peril.
For the record, I think RBG was racist and that Justice Sotomayor is a million times better jurist.
I also know she joined in this decision upholding child slavery (in which notorious conservative Justice Alito dissented). news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/su…
So the DA has to reassure passengers who witnessed a woman being raped on a train that they won't be prosecuted for something that's not even a crime because the police whipped everyone into a frenzy where they're probably terrified of vigilante attacks. cnn.com/2021/10/21/us/…
How the police *do not* help solve sexual assault cases. By discouraging witnesses from coming forward.
Also, I really hate the way media are still not accurately reporting this story - the headline makes it sound like the DA has decided not to prosecute bystanders that they could and maybe should prosecute, when that's not the case at all.
So much ignorance in this tweet. Cruz is talking about the "Australian government" but quote-tweeting the chief minister for the Northern Territory who is enacting a mandate specific to the territory.
It's a part of Australia where almost half of the population is Indigenous.
The Northern Territory is under the control of the Labor party; the federal government is under the control of the Liberal Party, which is completely misnamed because it is a conservative party.
Despite having one of the most vulnerable populations in the world, the Northern Territory has had zero COVID deaths.
Dayton PD coming up with every reason to justify horrifically brutalizing a human being.
Facts. First, you cannot search a vehicle based on someone's criminal history. That would give police a license to stop and search anyone with a record.
Second, it means absolutely nothing if a police dog sniffs cash and supposedly detects it has been in the presence of drugs. 90% of US bills have cocaine residue on them. nationalgeographic.com/science/articl…
Third, they claim they saw Mr. Owensby leaving a "known drug house" I guess to bolster their justification for the search.
Really? OK. So they must have seen Mr. Owensby had no use of his legs. This just makes it all so much worse.