This analysis ignores the fact that White women benefit from White supremacy because of their race.

White women may be disempowered by their gender, but are empowered by racism.
I always go back to the brilliant book by @sejr_historian, "They Were Her Property: White Women as Slave Owners in the American South."
She says: “Most of us continue to see white women through the lens of gender. This allows for us to be optimistic about the possibility that their gendered oppression will allow for them to find common cause with other dispossessed groups.”
I don't even think this is very complicated or that it should be controversial, but it seems to be for those who subscribe to White feminism.
I think it's because it forces all of us as White women to confront that we benefit from racism, even if we identify as being very much on the left.

Someone else whose work I have been really informed by on this issue and would recommend is @Karnythia. Check out Hood Feminism.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rebecca Kavanagh

Rebecca Kavanagh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrRJKavanagh

4 Nov
It's not just that only *one* Black juror has been seated in the trial of the three men charged with killing Ahmaud Arbery.

It's that the judge acknowledged the defense was using *intentional discrimination* in selecting jurors and did nothing about it.
cnn.com/2021/11/03/us/…
During jury selection, the defense and prosecution have unlimited challenges for cause - they simply have to show the judge why a juror would not be fair and impartial.
The defense and prosecution each then have a number of peremptory challenges where they can ask for a juror to be struck for any reason.

Except race. The reason has to be race-neutral.
Read 16 tweets
23 Oct
Maybe we could just stop mythologizing people all together?
If RBG taught us anything it is that we have blind faith in liberal icons at our own peril.
For the record, I think RBG was racist and that Justice Sotomayor is a million times better jurist.

I also know she joined in this decision upholding child slavery (in which notorious conservative Justice Alito dissented). news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/su…
Read 6 tweets
23 Oct
So the DA has to reassure passengers who witnessed a woman being raped on a train that they won't be prosecuted for something that's not even a crime because the police whipped everyone into a frenzy where they're probably terrified of vigilante attacks. cnn.com/2021/10/21/us/…
How the police *do not* help solve sexual assault cases. By discouraging witnesses from coming forward.
Also, I really hate the way media are still not accurately reporting this story - the headline makes it sound like the DA has decided not to prosecute bystanders that they could and maybe should prosecute, when that's not the case at all.
Read 5 tweets
19 Oct
So much ignorance in this tweet. Cruz is talking about the "Australian government" but quote-tweeting the chief minister for the Northern Territory who is enacting a mandate specific to the territory.

It's a part of Australia where almost half of the population is Indigenous.
The Northern Territory is under the control of the Labor party; the federal government is under the control of the Liberal Party, which is completely misnamed because it is a conservative party.
Despite having one of the most vulnerable populations in the world, the Northern Territory has had zero COVID deaths.
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
Dayton PD coming up with every reason to justify horrifically brutalizing a human being.

Facts. First, you cannot search a vehicle based on someone's criminal history. That would give police a license to stop and search anyone with a record.

daytondailynews.com/crime/dayton-f…
Second, it means absolutely nothing if a police dog sniffs cash and supposedly detects it has been in the presence of drugs. 90% of US bills have cocaine residue on them. nationalgeographic.com/science/articl…
Third, they claim they saw Mr. Owensby leaving a "known drug house" I guess to bolster their justification for the search.

Really? OK. So they must have seen Mr. Owensby had no use of his legs. This just makes it all so much worse.
Read 7 tweets
11 Oct
When I read that part of this dude's "suspicious" behavior was reaching for his luggage, I felt this sounded off.

nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-c…
Thinking a camera was a bomb would have been a terrible mistake to make on a flight across the Pacific Ocean.
Initial reporting made it sound like multiple passengers near this guy were troubled by him. Now it sounds like just this one woman.

Super problematic.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(