“Crocker co-authored a study published in 2012 in the journal Advances in Experimental Social Psychology that found that when people try to manage the impressions others have of them, ‘they create a cascade of unintended negative consequences for both themselves and others. …
“ ‘In contrast, when people try to contribute to the well-being of other people, they create a cascade of positive consequences for both themselves and others.’
“Examples of egosystem management, she says, include pointing out someone else’s error in a conversation to make oneself look better.
“ ‘Or, you withhold information from people you work with so you can be the one who solves the problem,’ she says. ‘That elicits competitiveness in other people & is bad for learning, psychological wellbeing, & for growth,’ because it doesn’t create supportive environments.”
Washington State’s head football coach wanted a religious exemption. Apparently he is a member of the Church of the Gullible. The university fired him, but not before taking extraordinary steps to answer his questions. espn.com/college-footba…
“On April 21, Rolovich was granted an audience with Dr. Guy Palmer, a world-renowned WSU regents professor of pathology and infectious diseases.
“It had been about four months since the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines were both granted emergency-use authorization by the FDA, and athletic director Pat Chun arranged for the meeting to take place.
“A federal judge who has strongly criticized the January 6 insurrection and handed down prison time to some convicted rioters is set to hear former President Donald Trump's challenge to a House subpoena of records from his time in office related to the siege.
“Judge Tanya Chutkan was assigned to hear Trump's suit, which lawyers for the former President filed on Monday.” cnn.com/2021/10/19/pol…
“ … Speaking earlier this month at a sentencing hearing for a nonviolent rioter who pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of illegally demonstrating in the Capitol, Chutkan made a tacit reference to Trump, …
“A judge ruled Wednesday that he'll seat one Black juror and 11 whites to decide the trial of the men who chased and killed Ahmaud Arbery, despite prosecutors' objections that several Black potential jurors were cut because of their race.”
“Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley acknowledged that ‘intentional discrimination’ by attorneys for the three white defendants charged in the death of the Black man appeared to have shaped jury selection. But he said Georgia law limited his authority to intervene.
“ … Minutes after the attorneys had finished narrowing a panel of 48 to a final jury of 12 on Wednesday, prosecutor Linda Dunikoski noted only a single Black juror made the panel.
She argued that defense lawyers had struck eight Black potential jurors because of their race.
I’ve seen some commentary suggesting Rodgers & the Packers have misled the NFL. That doesn’t appear to be the case. A number of players & coaches have tested positive & been quarantined this season. espn.com/nfl/story/_/id…
“Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers has tested positive for COVID-19 and will not play against the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday, a source confirmed to ESPN.
“The NFL has considered Rodgers as unvaccinated since the start of the season, sources confirmed to ESPN and as first reported by NFL Network.
“We tend to take for granted that the United States Supreme Court has the discretionary power, through its use of the writ of certiorari, to select the cases it wishes to decide. The Court, however, has not always possessed this discretion. …
“Professor Hartnett traces the history of certiorari in the Court, paying particular attention to the unprecedented efforts of Chief Justice William Howard Taft to promote the landmark Judges' Bill of 1925, & the uncritical deference to the Court shown by Congress in enacting it.
“After describing ways in which the Court asserted even broader discretion than Congress provided, Professor Hartnett questions whether certiorari is consistent with the traditional conceptions of judicial review, the nature of judicial power, and the rule of law.