The thesis of the Sovereign Individual holds up well. But there are three major countertrends.
The Individual Sovereign, and Xi Jinping in particular.
The Sovereign Collective, the leverage of nomadic groups.
The Autonomous Robot, as drones also change the logic of violence.
The Individual Sovereign
Technology matters - but so do founders. A sufficiently motivated founder can change the direction of technology. And Xi Jinping has refounded the Chinese state as a formidable, centralized, militaristic surveillance machine. reuters.com/investigates/s…
The Individual Sovereign is a problem for the Sovereign Individual. A single man at the helm of a total surveillance state is just a different thing than the US establishment. The latter may well *want* to crush free speech & free markets, but lacks the state capacity to do so.
Yes, the US establishment has NSA surveillance, media corps, the dollar, all these things it has inherited.
But fortunately it lacks the leadership to put these together into a systematically effective plan for oppression. So it’s losing control over matters foreign & domestic.
It’s not yet obvious today — you need to extrapolate a few trends — but one scenario is American anarchy, Chinese control, and an International Intermediate.
In the Chinese sphere of influence, the Sovereign Individual would be harshly tamped down by the Individual Sovereign.
This brings us to the 2nd countervailing force: the Sovereign Collective.
We should strive for crypto-civilization rather than crypto-anarchy. Dysfunctional legacy states are getting unbundled, but we need to build better ones.
The Sovereign Collective is a more natural fit for human nature than the Sovereign Individual.
Put another way: technology has enabled us to start new companies, new communities, and new currencies. Can it allow us to start new cities, even new countries? foresight.org/salon/balaji-s…
The collective exit to Miami was organic and unplanned.
But can we productize it? Build something like Nomadlist or Teleport, but for groups to crowdfund a migration together? That’s the concept of crowdchoice, a core idea behind the Sovereign Collective. 1729.com/miami
The Autonomous Robot
An important part of the Sovereign Individual thesis is the idea that encryption increases the individual’s power to resist coercion. However, drones can also increase state power to coerce in the physical world — without the same need for human conscripts.
Drones and autonomous robots in general are like firearms and encryption — something with nonobvious consequences for the monopoly of violence that underpins the state. They aren’t that easy to build, which favors states. But they are easy to operate, which favors individuals.
This also relates to Thiel’s point on how AI centralizes & crypto decentralizes. A Chinese drone armada may be a centralizing force that opposes the decentralization of crypto. Conversely, drones may make it easier for Sovereign Collectives to ward off an Individual Sovereign.
Each of these trends — Sovereign Individual, Individual Sovereign, Sovereign Collective, Autonomous Robot — are like forces applied to the status quo.
Different outcomes are possible. Many may coexist at the same time in different places. But it’s not just one force.
PS: there is at least one other force that belongs up there, which is quantum computing’s impact on encryption. A lot depends on whether the decryption process is expensive, secret, and available for a while only to a centralized state like China. brookings.edu/techstream/the…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's dark talent around the world, from the Midwest to the Middle East. Backing this talent is the right thing to do morally and the smart thing to do economically.
To be clear: I'm not talking about sending more tech talent to the US. Instead, I'm talking about backing dark talent around the world.
That includes the many white kids from places like the Midwest who've been unfairly quota'd out of Harvard. But it also includes those outside America whose societies were ravaged by war, socialism, or communism...and who are just now starting to become productive again.
The goal is global equality of opportunity. The Internet actually now provides the basis for uniform rule-of-law via rule-of-code, starting with Bitcoin and smart contracts. We just need to execute from here.
Yes. That's what the blockchain is: everyone worldwide gets access to their ideal monetary policy, payments, smart contracts, and entity formation. Enforced by incorruptible & transparent computer-based judges. And opted into on a purely voluntary basis.
Fifteen years ago the far left still controlled almost one third of India.
The Modi government fixed the issue by using force against actual terrorists while addressing the underlying discontent with economic development. It worked. indiatoday.in/amp/india-toda…x.com/iyervval/statu…
Both America and China were invested in the illusion that China wasn't already the world's strongest economy.
Psychologically, it suited the incumbent to appear strong. So America downplayed China's numbers.
Strategically, it suited the disruptor to appear weak. So China also sandbagged its own numbers.
But the illusion is becoming harder to maintain.
In retrospect, all the China cope over the last decade or so was really just the stealth on the Chinese stealth bomber.
Hide your strength and bide your time was Deng's strategy. Amazingly, denying China's strength somehow also became America's strategy.
For example, all the cope on China's demographics somehow being uniquely bad...when they have 1.4B+ people that crush every international science competition with minimal drug addiction, crime, or fatherlessness...and when their demographic problems have obvious robotic solutions.
Or, for another example, how MAGA sought to mimic China's manufacturing buildout and industrial policy without deeply understanding China's strengths in this area, which is like competing with Google by setting up a website. Vague references to 1945 substituted for understanding the year 2025.
One consequence of the cope is that China knows far more about America's strengths than vice versa. Surprisingly few Americans interested in re-industrialization have ever set foot in Shenzhen. Those who have, like @Molson_Hart, understand what modern China actually is.
Anyway, what @DoggyDog1208 calls the "skull chart" is the same phenomenon @yishan and I commented on months ago. Once China truly enters a vertical, like electric cars or solar, their pace of ascent[1] is so rapid that incumbents often don't even have time to react.
Now apply this at country level. China has flipped America so quickly on so many axes[2], particularly military ones like hypersonics or military-adjacent ones like power, that it can no longer be contained.
A major contributing factor was the dollar illusion. All that money printing made America think it was richer than China. And China was happy to let America persist in the illusion. But an illusion it was. Yet another way in which Keynesianism becomes the epitaph of empire.
The first kind of retard uses AI everywhere, even where it shouldn’t be used.
The second kind of retard sees AI everywhere, even where it isn’t used.
Usually, it’s obvious what threads are and aren’t AI-written.
But some people can’t tell the difference between normal writing and AI writing. And because they can’t tell the difference, they’ll either overuse AI…or accuse others of using AI!
What we actually may need are built-in statistical AI detectors for every public text field. Paste in a URL into an archive.is-like interface and get back the probability that any div on the page is AI-generated.
In general my view is that AI text shouldn’t be used raw. It’s like a search engine result, it’s lorem ipsum. Useful for research but not final results. AI code is different, but even that requires review. AI visuals are different still, and you can sometimes use them directly.
We’re still developing these conventions, as the tech itself is of course a moving target. But it is interesting that even technologists (who see the huge time-savings that AI gives for, say, data analysis or vibe coding) are annoyed by AI slop. Imagine how much the people who don’t see the positive parts of AI may hate AI.
TLDR: slop is the new spam, and we’ll need new tools and conventions to defeat it.
I agree email spammers will keep adapting.
But I don’t know if a typical poster will keep morphing their content in such a way.