but more than likely it would have a big bike room.
the walden48 is a mass timber, car-free BG in berlin, with a underground bike room: scharabi.de/walden-48/
also should have a workshop so that folks can work on their bikes...
naturally i understand there are life situations that may require a car, or perhaps there would be a time when a shared car is needed... so there could be a way to accommodate one car, or perhaps it's just a reserved ADA space curbside.
passivhaus is a must.
what is a passivhaus? it is a low-energy building. it is durable, comfortable, and climate resilient.
a small community room for gatherings.
a guest suite that could also function as caretaker's unit, isolation ward (ugh, i'm done w/ covid), a teenager's apt, or rental to balance books.
in vienna: practice room. library... a sauna!
would be a plethora of outdoor space.
each unit would have own balcony or loggia (the loggia is more protected, but the balcony is better for compactness)
in seattle... each floor can have max 4 units sharing single stair and elevator core. larger building, could mirror it for 8. sim to this plan.
all units adaptable.
no underground units that could flood.
building height
this is where it gets weird.
in seattle, we can do max 6 floors w/ single stair condition.
but mass timber really wants to be 7-8 floors. avoids gypsum everywhere. cost advantages v. 5 floors framing + (1-2 floors concrete)
so for now, we'll say 6 stories
this means we're looking at 20-24 units for a smaller/typical lot. 40-48 for wider lot w/ (2) single stair conditions.
this seems to be sweet spot for management of baugruppen as well.
multigenerational? of course.
my kiddos love hanging out with our retired neighbors. they don't get to see their grandparents much, either. so it helps fill that role. or perhaps we convince my parents to join the baugruppe
really the big question comes down to affordability.
there are a couple of things disadvantaging a baugruppe in seattle...
absurdly high land costs
high mass timber costs
i think my moonshot idea could be a work around on the land cost...
'Relegating cyclists to greenways off arterials will never result in the rapid uptake of cycling adoption we need to meet our climate goals. It prevents cyclists from getting to their destinations , which are very often on arterials because of our absurdly limiting zoning plan.'
seattle's mayor - who, instead of leading on climate action and sustainable mobility, has killed and delayed bike lanes all over the city for the last 4 years - proclaims, 'These actions shall include... doing more to incentivize modes like biking '
boy i forget about this every few months - but setback requirements in low rise zones really do make for the sh*ttiest urbanism possible.
LR3 in UV on a 50' wide x 100' deep lot has a 50' height limit, max far of 2.3
5000*2.3 = 11,500. divide that by 5 floors = 2300sf plates
2300 sf plates on a 50' wide build (zero side yard setbacks) results in buildings that are only 46' deep.
however, there land use code requires 7' average setbacks for LR3.
so a 2300 sf floor plate ends up being 36' wide x 63.9' deep
so you go from condition where units open up to street & massive courtyard that is more than half of the lot (left, space for trees!); to one where building units are oriented looking *at* the neighboring lots, almost no usable outdoor space (right)