Great to see this pre-print on rare-meets-common TYR/ human pigmentation genetics by Vincent Michaud (Bordeaux) and senior author Panagiotis (Panos) Sergouniotis (Manchester) - I am a co-author medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
One key thing is that it is a promoter variant which is associated with albinism and related eye phenotypes, not in fact as non-synonymous variant in LD (one needs to capture rare recombinations, and an example of needing deep phenotype positive ascertainmemt - case collections).
(The Promoter variant is the first SNP TYR c.-301C>T [rs4547091] - and it's LD NS proxy is c.575C>A (p.Ser192Tyr) [rs1042602] - by default, any program/analysis would have probably assigned function to the protein coding change)
This promoter variant significantly the other protein altering variant later on in the TYR gene: c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) and it is this combination of high expression with this protein altered variant which produces a high risk of albinism - as high as "classic" rare alleles!
Pigmentation at the back of the eye (RPE layer) also changes eye development, and we can see this both in the foveal thickness for this haplotype in the UK BioBank and in visual acuity - a haplotype specific effect (local epistasis if you like).
This goes to better understanding the risk - it is also worth noting here we need to get linkage of these SNPs together (in this case, both reasonably common) to accurately determine the risk of this phenotype
(Vincent and Panos were able to do this analysis by only looking at homozygote halpotypes, which goes to how common the SNPs are; less common SNPs would need more direct phasing to get the haplotype structure).
In many ways I see this as the first of many studies bridging rare and common - in some sense common SNPs have become here rare and "highly penetrant" haplotypes; rare SNPs clearly contribute to common endophenotypes in Hetreozygous form.
(Editorial - the "rare" / "common" human genetics split is sort of arbitary. It is all "genetics" with differing allele frequencies, different effect sizes and here, GxG terms)
Ethnicity, Ancestry Groups and Biology in humans; some thoughts triggered by @molly_przew threads and the recent Oxford paper on the likely mechanism of action for the COVID risk locus on chr3. TL;DR This is area is complex; racism +discrimination are real; biology is universal.
It's useful to remind yourself what some of these terms mean (or might mean). Ethnicity (also "Race" in US context) is usually defined via self identification - a person is given a number of options to tick, sometimes with hierarchy, and they tick one (or more) option.
A COVID viewpoint from increasingly cold London. TL;DR the world vaccination situation is improving, but there is a long way to go; Europe is entering a winter exit to endemicity surge; the UK is a leading country in this exit surge with internal angst, strife and screw ups
Context: I am an expert in human genetics and computational biology. I know experts in infectious disease epidemiology, viral genomics, immunology and clinical trials. I have COIs - I am consultant and shareholder of Oxford Nanopore and I was on the Ox/AZ trial.
Reminder: SARS-CoV-2 is now the fifth endemic coronavirus that infects humans, and by far the nastiest. For a subset (older, overweight, male) of people is causes a horrible disease, COVID, in which some people die, and many people have horrible time in hospital or longCOVID
COVID thoughts on an autumnal London day. TL;DR the developed vaccinated world has some tricky navigation, but is probably entering some endemic-ish state; the developed unvaccinated world is a bit mad and needs help; the rest of the world needs vaccines.
Context: I am an expert in genetics/genomics and computational biology. I know experts in infectious epidemiology, viral genomics, clinical trials and immunology. I have COIs; I am long established consultant to Oxford Nanopore and I was on the Ox/Az clinical trial.
Reminder: SARS-CoV-2 is an airborne virus. The latest variant, now globally dominant, transmits rapidly and all variants causes a horrible disease in subset of people - older, more overweight, male. Left unchecked many people would die and healthcare systems overwhelmed.
In general the response I think to the announcement of a polygenic-risk-score informed embryo selection has been right - one where the science is wrong, the clinical harm/benefit therefore also wrong, and one where ethical/societal considerations have to be folded in. However...
There are some people who say "but even if this is wrong now, it might not in the future" (true) and also "if genetics works, then this should work" often with some handwaving towards farm animal genetics/breeding/selection. In this twitter thread I'd like to tackle this.
(Context: I am a geneticist/genomicist. My two favourite organisms to study humans and Japanese rice paddy fish. I'm on the experiments/practical data science side, but have a pretty good understanding of the theory/stats side, partly because I've coded it myself/in my group)
A reminder; in the UK this process would clearly fall under HFEA, and applications to do this would almost certainly be rejected on ethical / societal grounds, on clinical harm to benefit and underlying scientific validity
I’m very positive about the use of genomics in healthcare - many diverse uses and its growing - but I am firmly against this use on ethics, clinical (I’m not an expert) and science (I am an expert). Blogged on this in 2019 ewanbirney.com/2019/05/why-em…
I think the imperial weights thing in the UK is silly (deeply silly) but I do think there was more method in "12" units (and for that matter, 60). 12 is a nice number for division (halves, thirds, quarters, sixths) and then the next nice number for division is 60 (fifths).
Of course the pounds to stone (14!) and then madness of Guineas (I still don't really understand) doesn't fit this. On historical numerology, I was reminded of the arcane voting system for the Dodge in Venice that involves 11, 13s and 17s as supposed "hard to game" prime numbers
As well as the measuring unit changing depending on what you were measuring (this is another moment of deep madness) I think this use of effectively base 12 might be more about early medieaval maths and plenty of mental arithmetic.