Great to see this pre-print on rare-meets-common TYR/ human pigmentation genetics by Vincent Michaud (Bordeaux) and senior author Panagiotis (Panos) Sergouniotis (Manchester) - I am a co-author medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
One key thing is that it is a promoter variant which is associated with albinism and related eye phenotypes, not in fact as non-synonymous variant in LD (one needs to capture rare recombinations, and an example of needing deep phenotype positive ascertainmemt - case collections). Image
(The Promoter variant is the first SNP TYR c.-301C>T [rs4547091] - and it's LD NS proxy is c.575C>A (p.Ser192Tyr) [rs1042602] - by default, any program/analysis would have probably assigned function to the protein coding change)
This promoter variant significantly the other protein altering variant later on in the TYR gene: c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) and it is this combination of high expression with this protein altered variant which produces a high risk of albinism - as high as "classic" rare alleles!
Pigmentation at the back of the eye (RPE layer) also changes eye development, and we can see this both in the foveal thickness for this haplotype in the UK BioBank and in visual acuity - a haplotype specific effect (local epistasis if you like).
This goes to better understanding the risk - it is also worth noting here we need to get linkage of these SNPs together (in this case, both reasonably common) to accurately determine the risk of this phenotype
(Vincent and Panos were able to do this analysis by only looking at homozygote halpotypes, which goes to how common the SNPs are; less common SNPs would need more direct phasing to get the haplotype structure).
In many ways I see this as the first of many studies bridging rare and common - in some sense common SNPs have become here rare and "highly penetrant" haplotypes; rare SNPs clearly contribute to common endophenotypes in Hetreozygous form.
(Editorial - the "rare" / "common" human genetics split is sort of arbitary. It is all "genetics" with differing allele frequencies, different effect sizes and here, GxG terms)
Anyway, lovely "1 figure" paper by Vincent and Panos - @tuuliel, @dgmacarthur, @HeidiRehm @SharonPlon @mehurles and other rare-meets-common geneticists - give it a read!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ewan Birney

Ewan Birney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ewanbirney

6 Nov
Ethnicity, Ancestry Groups and Biology in humans; some thoughts triggered by @molly_przew threads and the recent Oxford paper on the likely mechanism of action for the COVID risk locus on chr3. TL;DR This is area is complex; racism +discrimination are real; biology is universal.
It's useful to remind yourself what some of these terms mean (or might mean). Ethnicity (also "Race" in US context) is usually defined via self identification - a person is given a number of options to tick, sometimes with hierarchy, and they tick one (or more) option.
These boxes are very culturally and nation-state defined. eg: The US has it's census terms (census.gov/topics/populat…); the UK has different terms (ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/dashboards/eth…); Japan their own scheme; in France it is illegal to ask this question.
Read 36 tweets
23 Oct
A COVID viewpoint from increasingly cold London. TL;DR the world vaccination situation is improving, but there is a long way to go; Europe is entering a winter exit to endemicity surge; the UK is a leading country in this exit surge with internal angst, strife and screw ups
Context: I am an expert in human genetics and computational biology. I know experts in infectious disease epidemiology, viral genomics, immunology and clinical trials. I have COIs - I am consultant and shareholder of Oxford Nanopore and I was on the Ox/AZ trial.
Reminder: SARS-CoV-2 is now the fifth endemic coronavirus that infects humans, and by far the nastiest. For a subset (older, overweight, male) of people is causes a horrible disease, COVID, in which some people die, and many people have horrible time in hospital or longCOVID
Read 25 tweets
26 Sep
COVID thoughts on an autumnal London day. TL;DR the developed vaccinated world has some tricky navigation, but is probably entering some endemic-ish state; the developed unvaccinated world is a bit mad and needs help; the rest of the world needs vaccines.
Context: I am an expert in genetics/genomics and computational biology. I know experts in infectious epidemiology, viral genomics, clinical trials and immunology. I have COIs; I am long established consultant to Oxford Nanopore and I was on the Ox/Az clinical trial.
Reminder: SARS-CoV-2 is an airborne virus. The latest variant, now globally dominant, transmits rapidly and all variants causes a horrible disease in subset of people - older, more overweight, male. Left unchecked many people would die and healthcare systems overwhelmed.
Read 21 tweets
19 Sep
In general the response I think to the announcement of a polygenic-risk-score informed embryo selection has been right - one where the science is wrong, the clinical harm/benefit therefore also wrong, and one where ethical/societal considerations have to be folded in. However...
There are some people who say "but even if this is wrong now, it might not in the future" (true) and also "if genetics works, then this should work" often with some handwaving towards farm animal genetics/breeding/selection. In this twitter thread I'd like to tackle this.
(Context: I am a geneticist/genomicist. My two favourite organisms to study humans and Japanese rice paddy fish. I'm on the experiments/practical data science side, but have a pretty good understanding of the theory/stats side, partly because I've coded it myself/in my group)
Read 23 tweets
18 Sep
So depressing rereading this thread of the first embryo selection by broad genomic profiling from healthy donors in the US
A reminder; in the UK this process would clearly fall under HFEA, and applications to do this would almost certainly be rejected on ethical / societal grounds, on clinical harm to benefit and underlying scientific validity
I’m very positive about the use of genomics in healthcare - many diverse uses and its growing - but I am firmly against this use on ethics, clinical (I’m not an expert) and science (I am an expert). Blogged on this in 2019 ewanbirney.com/2019/05/why-em…
Read 4 tweets
17 Sep
I think the imperial weights thing in the UK is silly (deeply silly) but I do think there was more method in "12" units (and for that matter, 60). 12 is a nice number for division (halves, thirds, quarters, sixths) and then the next nice number for division is 60 (fifths).
Of course the pounds to stone (14!) and then madness of Guineas (I still don't really understand) doesn't fit this. On historical numerology, I was reminded of the arcane voting system for the Dodge in Venice that involves 11, 13s and 17s as supposed "hard to game" prime numbers
As well as the measuring unit changing depending on what you were measuring (this is another moment of deep madness) I think this use of effectively base 12 might be more about early medieaval maths and plenty of mental arithmetic.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(