Thread 4: Major NSF/ground recommendations to accomplish the #astro2020 vision:
The first ground recommendation is a US Extremely Large Telescope program with the US taking a share totaling 50% in the Thirty Meter and Giant Magellan Telescopes, targeting 25% of each
Final participation is contingent on a NSF review showing demonstrated viability of the projects, a final site selection for TMT, and a clear governance plan.
Large ground-based telescopes are the most flexible scientific tool known to humans - almost infinitely adaptable to the science questions of the next decades. US ELT capability is critical for essentially all the science questions identified in the report.
The second recommendation is the Cosmic Microwave Background Stage 4 program. This would be a collaboration between NSF and DOE. Telescopes in Chile and at the South Pole would push cosmic microwave background studies to the next level.
It must be capable of general astrophysics, not oy cosmology; these wavelengths are an important window on what the universe is doing. It should provide transient alerts and calibrated and useable maps on a rapid cadence.
The third large ground recommendation is the next-generation Very Large Array, ngVLA. This replaces the VLA with something an order of magnitude more sensitive and with far greater angular resolution.
This capability could probe planet formation, study the flow of gas in galaxies, resolve the surface of stars, and explore the transient universe.
NGVLA is an extremely ambitious project - it would be the largest NSF has ever undertaken. The report recommends a program to support science design, development, cost studies, and prototyping. After a review, the program would move to MREFC construction.
Although they are not in our direct purview, we support physics/astrophysics facilities such as the Ice Cube Gen 2 neutrino observatory and development for future gravitational wave observatories
Finally, NSF’s mid-scale program should be enhanced. There are many compelling ideas for astronomical facilities at the $20M-100M level - far to many for current funding. We recommend the mid-scale program be expanded, and include both open calls and strategic priority areas.
The latter would include time-domain, innovative radio capabilities, massively multiplexed spectroscopy, and facility telescope instruments.
The report recognizes that US ground-OIR capabilities are falling behind ESO, while the time available to the broad US community is shrinking. Enhancing those capabilities through the mid-scale instrumentation program, with broad benefits to the whole US community, is key.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. An integrated Great Observatories Mission and Technology Maturation Program. Future missions are big. Before they can formally commence, the technology and mission architecture must be mature.
Mature enough that realistic costs and schedules and feasibility can be assessed. This proposed process ties technology to specific missions and architectures; evolving a mission as technology matures.
The first and highest priority mission is a 6-m (inscribed) IR/O/UV telescope capable of imaging earthlike worlds with broad astrophysics capabilities (especially in the UV) - see this thread
Thread 2: process. The report is work of 145 committee and panel members, plus 21 amazing @theNASEM staff (who I love unconditionally). Working with these people was a privilege.
The input of the community was critical, from the incredibly detailed Flagship mission studies to 867 white papers. Every white paper, every page of every study, was read by one ore more committee and panel members.
Six science panels reviewed the field and identified key questions in their areas. Informed by that, five program panels focused on different techniques (space OIR, etc). Program panels evaluated proposed missions and facilities against these science questions
First, I wanted to highlight with the major NASA recommendation of the Decadal Survey: a 6-m class telescope capable of imaging Earthlike worlds orbiting sunlike stars. @theNASEM#astro2020.
JWST, and the Extremely Large groundbased telescopes, can study potentially habitable planets huddled close to the coolest stars - a critical capability - but a world like our own Earth is beyond the reach of anything but a dedicated space telescope
The work of the whole community, distilled into the @luvoirtelescope and @nasahabex visions, makes it clear that this is possible. Uncertainties that existed in 2010 have been resolved - we know how to build such a telescope. We know how it would operate.
#astro2020 schedule reminder: the report text will be available at 11 AM eastern time, 8 AM pacific time. Followed by a live briefing by the committee chairs at 2 PM eastern / 11 AM pacific. nationalacademies.org/our-work/decad…
Much less excitingly, I'll do an overly-long-summary here on twitter.
I’m going to post several threads covering key points (especially the capital-R Recommendations) in the #astro2020 report from the @nasem. These are going to be long (I’m not good at concise) and remarkably sarcasm-free.
Let’s do some Actual Math (tm). The nearest star is about 4.4 light years, or 1.3 parsecs, away. That’s (rounding a little) about 280,000 times further from Earth than the sun.
(Technically it’s a triple star, but one of them is small and the other is megatiny so we will just count the sunlike one, Alpha Centauri A)
2019: #proximab wins the #exocup, generating a surge of scientific and popular interest and funding
2023: Thermal imaging cameras determine that the planet is present
2027: ELT spectroscopy confirms that it is habitable
2030: Breakthrough foundation launches lasersail probes
2036: A fleet of femtosatellites sweeps through the Proxima system at 25% of the speed of light, swarming through a system inhabited by a peaceful, advanced civilization
2037: The terrified Proximans plan their revenge.
2045: Proximans lanuch retaliatory Von Neuman Probe
2070: Proximan robot planet-killers began dismantling our solar system