Here's the truth: we've dodged most of the regulatory fire so far, but things will likely get worse before they get better.

To the extent I seem overly optimistic, that's a strategic choice. It's the best way to be effective, & when I *do* need to sound the alarm, you'll listen.
But when I say "we will prevail," as I often do in the course of explaining some enforcement action or proposed legislation or whatever, I mean it.

It won't be easy, there'll be hard days, & I don't know exactly what path we'll take to get through. But we will.

It's inevitable.
One of our huge advantages is our ability to coordinate online. We're digitally native: this makes us fast, broad, & effective in a way few other movements have been.

It's the same reason Bitcoin took off in the first place; the same reason everything we're doing has momentum.
To press that advantage, we'll need to conduct much of our government affairs campaign in public.

That means learning how to communicate, how to work together, how to speak with one voice. Nobody's ever done this before on the scale we need to. It'll be tough.

It's inevitable.
So, here's my ask:

Let's all recognize that we're in uncharted waters, that we're trying to do something big here, that the challenges are great, that we'll make mistakes, but at the end of the day, we'll do it all together.

We'll prevail together. There's simply no other way.
Those challenges will come in many forms, but the only one that truly worries me is the time-tested strategy of divide & conquer.

The outrage machine has turned its eye toward us. We can't fall for it, we can't feed it.

We have to stay focused. We have to be patient.
To close out this stream of thought:

I expect the next few years will be the most important in the history of crypto policy, before or after. It's up to us to create the future we want for the world. Nobody will do it for us.

We will prevail.

I'll have news next week.

[end]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jake Chervinsky

Jake Chervinsky Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jchervinsky

4 Nov
1/ The infrastructure bill is heading for a vote in the House.

Yes, the crypto provisions are just as bad as they were months ago. Yes, the impact of Section 6050I has been underexplored.

No, you don't need to call your reps. The political reality is: it's out of our hands now.
2/ Importantly, nothing will happen right away.

The crypto provisions don't go into effect until 2024 (for FY2023 reporting). We can try to get them repealed or amended before then.

They also need rulemaking from Treasury to define their scope. We'll be active in that process.
3/ I'm as disappointed as anyone, but strategically, it's crucial we understand when to fight & when to keep our powder dry.

We made a big impact in DC during the Senate vote. That was our shot & we made it count. The broader politics have taken over now:
Read 6 tweets
1 Nov
We'll have plenty of time to pick apart the new stablecoin report.

For now, the highlight in my mind is the recommendation that "Congress act promptly to enact legislation...."

Prompt action from this Congress on *anything* is unlikely, let alone on something like stablecoins.
In the meantime, the report seems to acknowledge that federal agencies lack the authority necessary to implement its many & varied recommendations.

The report tells FSOC to "consider steps available to it" -- "in the absence of Congressional action, which is urgently needed...."
Long story short, it sounds like nothing big will (or can) happen any time soon.

That's a good thing in my view, since the report clearly gets a lot of stuff wrong. It will (& should) take time to sort through what makes sense & what doesn't.

We'll get there. For now, carry on.
Read 4 tweets
30 Oct
If you think the metaverse comes packaged in a set of VR goggles or branded with a Web2 corporate logo, you don't understand the metaverse.
I suspect the reason most people don't understand the metaverse, including all the trad tech journos who've spilled tons of ink on it this week, is because they haven't experienced it yet.

"Unfortunately no one can be told what the metaverse is. You have to see it for yourself."
Ready Player One was a useful analogy for the metaverse before it got off the ground, but does more harm than good now.

It makes people think the metaverse is just people sitting at home with VR headsets on, talking to their parents as a living room hologram. 🙄

VR != metaverse
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
FATF published its updated crypto AML guidance today. It's marginally better than the March draft.

As often happens, industry explained why the draft made no sense, & FATF's reaction was just to make it more vague. No answers here. The saga continues.

🧵 of threads & writeups:
From @coincenter's @valkenburgh, explaining the good, bad, & ugly of the updated guidance & why it's "far too vague and verbose to actually create reasonably clear and narrow limits for surveillance obligations."
From @fund_defi's @millercwl, who you're probably not following yet but definitely should be, if you care at all about DeFi. Miller nails how the guidance could (but won't necessarily) impact DeFi protocols.
Read 7 tweets
1 Oct
1/ Some personal news: after 2.5 amazing years, yesterday was my last day at @compoundfinance ❤️

It's been a genuine honor helping @rleshner, @justHGH, & the Compound Labs team build the future of finance 🤖

I'm taking October off, then starting a new challenge (stay tuned) 🧵
2/ I joined Compound in May 2019 in the depths of crypto winter. BTC was around $6k & ETH was around $200.

The Compound v2 protocol was one month old. TVL was about $10m. Only a handful of DeFi projects existed & they weren't even called DeFi yet.

What an incredible journey 🤯
3/ I worked on some big projects over the years, like decentralizing the Compound protocol & launching Compound Treasury.

It's been fascinating to see the community take charge of decentralized governance, & it's been fulfilling to create a novel financial product on DeFi rails.
Read 6 tweets
29 Sep
1/ I'm very excited to be working with @graadient & the Grwth Lbs team as a strategic advisor as they build out & decentralize @groprotocol 🎉

Gro is a next-gen yield protocol that fills a huge gap in DeFi market structure: autonomous risk management 👇
thedefiant.io/gro-protocol-l…
2/ Gro uses risk tranching to create two stablecoin pools, PWRD & Vault, with different risk & reward profiles.

By design, PWRD offers lower yield while Vault offers higher yield at a cost: Vault bears the risk of loss for the whole protocol. In other words, Vault protects PWRD.
3/ Gro addresses one of the most common critiques I hear about DeFi: the lack of crypto-native, professional-grade risk management tools & products.

This is one of the aspects of DeFi that excites me most: its unique ability to mitigate risks in a programmatic & transparent way.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(