If the problem with some lab leak proponents is that they’re “just asking questions”, then the problem with some natural spillover proponents is that they “don’t ask questions”.
From day 1, some believed SARS2 must’ve come from a market, everything else could not be questioned.
The amount of misinfo coming from both sides has been comparable, but in-field experts should be held to a higher standard because their word is taken at face value by journalists and the public.
Yet we have seen zero accountability for the misinformation spread by some experts.
Have any of the experts who cast the lab origin hypothesis as a conspiracy theory taken any responsibility for their anti-scientific statements?
Have any of the journalists misled by them gone back to these experts and said wtf?
Probably a good time to start going through the numerous articles in 2020 and even 2021, published by top media outlets quoting Peter Daszak and friends without question, to start adding much needed clarifications on the EcoHealth’s COIs re: the #OriginOfCovid
Many of the COIs we’ve seen are not even slightly nebulous. Many of the #OriginOfCovid advisors and investigators have strong financial, personal, professional, reputational interests in making sure this virus didn’t come from a lab.
Somehow it has recently upgraded to “let’s not investigate the #OriginOfCovid because the world can’t handle knowing that the virus likely came from a lab”
I find this more honest than “lab leak is a conspiracy theory” but still anti-scientific.
Stop reassuring each other that the #OriginOfCovid will never be found.
Some people might already know the origin but need to wait for a safer time to blow the whistle.
Let’s focus on making best efforts to investigate and also make pathogen research safer.
It doesn't help that, in July, 40+ science orgs wrote:
"We urge [Congress] to reject attempts to impose restrictions on federally funded research or the operations of federal science agencies based on premature conclusions about how the pandemic emerged." asm.org/Articles/Polic…
There are some scientists who will refuse to implement new framework+oversight over risky pathogen research until someone shows them an authenticated video from 2019 of a tube labeled SARSrCoV with novel FCS spilling directly into the mouth of a scientist in Wuhan.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some experts have been misinformed that it took years to find the intermediate host of SARS1. Actually only took 2 months once the virus was isolated to find several infected animals at a market.
It has been ~2 years since SARS2 was detected - no intermediate host to be seen.
It is not normal that in 2019, with all of our greatly advanced tech, in a city housing the world's greatest expertise for tracking SARSrCoV outbreaks, it has been so challenging to find the proximal origin or intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2.
And we know that when SARS-CoV-2 emerged in Wuhan, the local institute of virology had been actively working with at least 9 of the closest virus relatives to SARS-CoV-2 - all collected from a South China mine where 6 miners had sickened with a mysterious pneumonia, half died.
I regret to inform some that the photo of Vancouver above with 6 rainbows going in all directions is doctored. This type of rainbow phenomenon can’t happen.
The city is genuinely one of the most beautiful places to live though :)
But here is a photo of a real rainbowy rare weather phenomenon… “fire rainbows” seen in Iceland.
A thread from Feb this year. We cannot afford to set a dangerous precedent showing that there is no way to hold accountable labs engaged in risky research that can accidentally lead to massive loss of life or bad actors intentionally creating bioweapons.
"Even some scientists who favor the natural origins theory argue for a fuller investigation because they believe it would set a precedent... Forgoing the inquiry would send a dangerous signal: Accountability isn’t guaranteed." latimes.com/world-nation/s…
"Our group has considerable expertise in interfacing with the appropriate NIH P3CO institutional review boards to review, revise and finalize research designs" theintercept.com/document/2021/…
Yea, I'm going to say at this point maybe their group has too much expertise in interfacing with the NIH P3CO institutional review boards.
Also, all of these guys are still collaborating with each other and EcoHealth on virus hunting and experimentation. At least one is on the @WHO SAGO committee.
Listening and re-listening to the exchange between Senator Braun and Dr Fauci.
There is classified info all 100 senators voted to declassify. Fauci is Biden’s main advisor on this issue. Did he commit to advise the release of the classified info?
The virus that causes COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 has been cultured/isolated/purified countless times by independent research groups across numerous countries over the past 2 years.
There’s probably someone in the Boston area handling a SARS-CoV-2 isolate from a patient at this very moment as I tweet.
No one has patented the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
There is no virus that meets Koch’s postulates, which were invented before discovery of viruses. (Even some bacteria haven’t met Koch’s postulates.) Yet so many viruses have been isolated and are real.