One of the things I repeat to my students all the time is how people fought and died--literally--for the 8 hour day and 40 hour week for 75 years before it was enshrined in federal law. And then it was standard for maybe 60 years before employers reneged again.
It's fascinating to see the demand for shorter and more predictable hours--8 hours for work, 8 hours for sleep, and 8 hours for what we will--reassert itself as a major struggle at Nabisco, Kellogg's, Deere, New York Magazine, etc., etc.
One of the things workers are (re)learning now is that legal requirements for short hours won't cut it. The Fair Labor Standards Act was not the first law to limit working hours. Many others had been passed and ignored. What gets workers shorter hours is power--that is, a union.
I note also how the *reason* workers need shorter hours is the same now as it was in the second half of the 19th century: the need for rest, the need for recreation, the desire to have time to better themselves, the demand to have time to be full and free citizens.
There's a reason the short hour movement started just after Emancipation: it was part of a nationwide movement to define what it would be to be free workers. Freedom has to mean not just the ability to quit, but the ability to fully engage in free society.
And you can't engage in free society--in education, in politics, in family life, in leisure--if you only have time for work and sleep. We need 8 hours (at least!) for what we will.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New in the Maine constitution: “All individuals have a natural, inherent and unalienable right to food, including the right to grow … consume the food of their own choosing for their own nourishment, sustenance, bodily health and well-being.” modernfarmer.com/2021/11/maine-…
Although it’s very telling that constitution amendment is very explicit that private property rights trump the “natural, inherent and unalienable right to food.”
“as long as an individual does not commit trespassing, theft, poaching or other abuses of private property rights, public lands or natural resources in the harvesting, production or acquisition of food.”
As an American Jew, I reject Israel for many reasons: I reject the current violence, perpetrated by Israeli Jewish citizens and the state, against Palestinians; I reject the current politics of Israel which seems to encourage and embolden Jewish fascism, which is repugnant to me
I reject my government (that is, the United States government) supporting ideologically and materially the violence and dispossession Israel--state and citizens--visits on Palestinians. As a diaspora Jew I reject the ideology that insists I do not belong where I am.
I reject a state that claims to speak and act for me, but to which I have no historical, familial, or political connection. I reject the theft of people's land and opportunities, especially when the thieves claim they act on my behalf.
Avoiding grading by putting in one of my book orders for next semester. Featuring (unchanged in recent years): @LaneWindham, @beverlygage, the untwittered but wonderful Bethany Moreton, @ToniGilpin et al., and David von Drehle. And a stapler, because we'll be back in person!
My labor class is unchanged because every year it's the best class I teach, and why mess with it? (I mean, the reason to mess with it would be to add @rsgexp's book, but I don't know what I'd take out to make space.) My disaster class needs some tinkering, so no book order yet.
Should you be interested: here's the syllabus for my labor course, which is called Work, Freedom, and Social Change. s18798.pcdn.co/remes/wp-conte…
A quick thread about something I've been pondering. The two states I think the most about--Connecticut and New York--have radically different vaccination regimes.
Connecticut's system is entirely by age (plus teachers and day care workers). The idea is that by keeping it simple and vaccinating people quickly, you deal with equity issues by making vaccines less scarce and easier to get.
New York has done the opposite: a very complex system based on disability and health, jobs and age. The idea is that the complexity gives more entry points and so creates more equity.
The worst part of the Nate Silvery nonsense today is that every epidemiologist, especially every infectious disease epidemiologist, is exhausted right now. They’ve been worried and overworked since January. Everything they’ve worried about, warned about, has come true.
It is exhausting and dispiriting to play Cassandra for months. Many of them have done so while their research budgets have been frozen, while their universities have imposed austerity on them. They’ve put their actual research on hold.
And they’ve done this while playing epidemiologist on call to all their friends and relatives, often while being forced to play Covid police (people call and bargain: can I do X? What about if I do it in Y way? Please?)
It'S nOt JuSt ThE uNiTeD StaTeS!! EuRoPe ShOwS uS CoViD cAn'T bE cOnTrOLlEd!!
Maybe cumulative deaths per million makes the point better. (Although it is notable how the US curve looks different from my arbitrarily selected European countries.)