Nick Mark MD Profile picture
Nov 5, 2021 15 tweets 8 min read Read on X
💊Exciting news today about another oral therapy for early COVID: reduced hospitalization & mortality.

Here’s a Deep dive 🧵 on the new PF-07321332 protease inhibitor (“Paxlovid”) & the very impressive results announced from the EPIC-HR trial.
TL/DR: this is a big deal.
1/
What the heck is PF-07321332?

All coronaviruses produce a polypeptide that must be cleaved by a protease into 11 proteins. Without this protease the virus can’t co-opt cellar machinery & reproduce.

PF-07321332 Inhibits the viral main protease (Mpro).
2/

pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/242
Specifically PF-07321332 binds to the catalytic site of Mpro.

Mpro is a great target because there are unique features of Mpro not found in *any* human enzymes & because spike protein mutations wouldn’t confer resistance.

In short, an ideal drug🎯
3/

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
In contrast to other SARS-CoV-2 drugs (remdesivir, Molnupiravir) which are nucleoside analogs, protease inhibition (PI) should have fewer off target effects. (E.g. No risk of mutagenesis).

Also analogous PI drugs are very effective against HIV & HCV. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protease_…
4/
Building on work with SARS-CoV1 (which has a 100% identical Mpro catalytic site) researchers developed potent covalent inhibitors of the viral Mpro: PF-07321332

(Sidebar: “electrophilic warhead” would be an excellent name for a band)
5/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33054210/?dopt…
After development of candidate Mpro inhibitors in vitro, the drug showed promise in mouse models.🐁

First in human trials (NCT04756531) began in February 2021. These studies found an effective Cmax and tolerable AE profile.🤞
5/
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04…
The Evaluation of Protease Inhibition in COVID-19 High Risk Patients (EPIC-HR) study was begun in July 2021.

It was a n=3000 blinded RCT comparing PF-07321332 vs placebo. It was performed at 359 sites in the 🇺🇸 & other countries (🇧🇷🇨🇴🇯🇵 🇲🇾🇰🇷 & others)
6/
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04…
Sidebar: Why combine w/ ritonavir esp since lopinavir/ritonavir wasn't effective against COVID19?

They added Ritonavir not for anti-viral effects but to "boost" drug levels of PF-07321332 by inhibiting CYP3A. We do something analogous w/ "ritonavir boosted darunavir" in HIV.
7/
EPIC-HR enrolled "high risk" COVID19 patient w/i 5 days of symptoms.

High risk was defined as ≥ 1 high risk condition by CDC criteria (cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…)

Notably they are doing similar trials in standard risk pts (EPIC-SR) & post exposure prophylaxis (EPIC-PEP)
8/
The primary endpoint of EPIC-HR was hospitalization or death within 28 days of randomization.
Secondary endpoints were pretty much what you'd expect (resolution of symptoms, clearance of virus, longer term outcomes, and adverse effects).
9/
The trial record and statistical plan seem normal & rigorous.

As far as I can see no🚩 in the study design or protoocl changes. (admittedly I'm reading quickly & having worked overnight in the ICU!)
10/
The results of PF-07321332 vs placebo were impressive! So impressive that EPIC-HR was stopped early by IDMC/FDA at interim analysis.

Hospitalizations
6/607 (1%) vs 41/612 (6.7%) [p<0.0001]

28 Day mortality
0/389 (0%) vs 10/385 (1.6%) [p<0.0001]
pfizer.com/news/press-rel…
11/
Overall this was an 89% reduction in the composite outcome of death/hospitalization.
A NNT of 17 to prevent a hospitalization & a NNT of 62 to prevent a death.

& the pre-specified subgroup of patients who presented sooner (within 3 days of symptom onset) did even better.
12/
Only limited safety data provided:
Of 1881 pts, side effects "most of which were mild" were 19% w/ PF-07321332 vs 21% w/ placebo

There were fewer severe AEs w/ drug than placebo: 1.7% vs. 6.6%, & discontinuation due to side effect was more common with placebo: 2.1% vs. 4.1%
13/
Bottom line:
-the anti-viral PF-07321332 seems promising in vitro
-there were significant reductions in hospitalizations & mortality in a large phase 2/3 RCT; these are clinically meaningful effects
-I'm excited to see more data when they go to the FDA later this month!
14/14

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Mark MD

Nick Mark MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickmmark

Jul 16
The media silence on this is deafening.

Did he have a head CT? What did it show?
Did he have stitches? Tetanus shot?

The NYT ran nonstop stories about Biden’s health after the debate but can’t be bothered to report on the health of someone who was literally shot in the head?
To the people in the replies who say it’s impossible because of “HIPPA”
1. I assume you mean HIPAA
2. A normal presidential candidate would allow his doctors to release the info. This is exactly what happened when Reagan survived an assassination attempt.
washingtonpost.com/obituaries/202…
My advice to journalists is to lookup tangential gunshot wounds (TGSW).

Ask questions like:
- what imaging has he had?
- what cognitive assessments?
- has he seen a neurosurgeon or neurologist?
- he’s previously had symptoms like slurred speech, abnormal gait - are these worse?
Read 4 tweets
Jun 30
You've probably heard "don't give lactated ringers because it raises lactate"

This statement is ~98% false, but there's one crucial practice-changing fact that you need to know.

A 🧵 all about lactic acid and lactated ringers!
1/
Image
Image
First off, we should ackowledge the obvious: Lactated ringers does in fact contain lactate... 28 mEq/L in fact

BUT there's one little detail to remember:
Lactate ≠ Lactic acid

When we measure "lactate" we care about the ACID (H+) which lowers pH & causes organ dysfunction
2/ Image
But the correlation between pH & lactate is really bad!

Look at this analysis of lactate vs pH in 171 ICU patients.

There is a *weak* correlation in people with arterial lactate > 5, but even w/ lactate =10, pH ranged from 7.5 to 7.05. Quite a spread!

3/ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 13
If you intubate you need to read the #PREOXI trial!
-n=1301 people requiring intubation in ED/ ICU were randomized to preoxygenation with oxygen mask vs non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
-NIV HALVED the risk of hypoxemia: 9 vs 18%
-NIV reduced mortality: 0.2% vs 1.1%

#CCR24
🧵
1/

Image
Image
Image
Hypoxemia (SpO2 <85%) occurs in 10-20% of ED & ICU intubations.

1-2% of intubations performed in ED/ICU result in cardiac arrest!

This is an exceptionally dangerous procedure and preoxygenation is essential to keep patients safe.

But what’s the *BEST* way to preoxygenate?
2/
Most people use a non-rebreather oxygen mask, but because of its loose fit it often delivers much less than 100% FiO2.

NIV (“BiPAP”) delivers a higher FiO2 because of its tight fit. It also delivers PEEP & achieves a higher mean airway pressure which is theoretically helpful!
3/
Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Jun 12
Results from #PROTECTION presented #CCR24 & published @NEJM.
- DB RCT of amino acid infusion vs placebo in n=3511 people undergoing cardiac surgery w/ bypass.
- Reduced incidence of AKI (26.9% vs 31.7% NNT=20) & need for RRT (1.4% vs 1.9% NNT=200)

Potential game changer!

🧵
1/
Image
Image
I work in a busy CVICU & I often see AKI following cardiac surgery.

Despite risk stratification & hemodynamic optimization, AKI remains one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery with bypass.

Even a modest reduction in AKI/CRRT would be great for my patients.
2/ From Nature reviews nephrology  https://www.nature.com/articles/nrneph.2017.119
During cardiac surgery w/ bypass, renal blood flow (RBF) is reduced dramatically. This causes injury, especially in susceptible individuals.

But what if we could use physiology to protect the kidneys?

Renal blood vessels dilate after a high protein meal increasing RBF & GFR!
3/ https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(18)33243-4/fulltext
Read 11 tweets
May 3
A slightly tricky blood gas case:

77 yo with respiratory distress, RR 30, SpO2 80% on non-rebreather at 15 lpm

CXR & TTE are unrevealing

pH 7.58 / PaCO2 24 / PaO2 >500 / HCO3 22

MetHb 0% CarboxyHb 0%

The ABG looks like this: Image
The answer is sulfhemoglobinemia.

Sulfhemoglobinemia is a *permanently* modified hemoglobin associated with exposure to TMP/SMX, dapsone, phenazopyridine, & other amino & nitro compounds.

It has an altered oxy-hemoglobin dissociation curve.

2/

Image
Image
Image
Sulfhemoglobinemia is easily confused with methemoglobinemia. Both have very dark colored blood & present with cyanosis. Diagnosis typically requires a specialized lab.

Spoiler: you may have heard that SulfHb is green. It isn’t really. You’re thinking of Vulcans’ blood.

3/
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 28
This story is absolutely shocking.

Philip Morris International (PMI) spent millions to influence medical education by buying a series of “CMEs” at Medscape!

How else has big tobacco tried to normalize vaping & influence the medical community?

🧵
1/
theexamination.org/articles/medsc…
Recently it was revealed that Philip Morris International (PMI) had SPONSORED CME materials about smokeless tobacco products on Medscape.

I had the opportunity to review these “CME” materials & they are pretty shocking!
2/

Image
Image
Image
One truly incredible thing about this “CME” was that it has NO DISCLOSURE SLIDE!

The fact that people teaching about vaping don’t disclose their financial ties to the tobacco industry is absolutely bonkers!

Why isn’t there a sunshine act for this?
3/
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(