Nick Mark MD Profile picture
Nov 5, 2021 15 tweets 8 min read Read on X
💊Exciting news today about another oral therapy for early COVID: reduced hospitalization & mortality.

Here’s a Deep dive 🧵 on the new PF-07321332 protease inhibitor (“Paxlovid”) & the very impressive results announced from the EPIC-HR trial.
TL/DR: this is a big deal.
1/
What the heck is PF-07321332?

All coronaviruses produce a polypeptide that must be cleaved by a protease into 11 proteins. Without this protease the virus can’t co-opt cellar machinery & reproduce.

PF-07321332 Inhibits the viral main protease (Mpro).
2/

pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/242
Specifically PF-07321332 binds to the catalytic site of Mpro.

Mpro is a great target because there are unique features of Mpro not found in *any* human enzymes & because spike protein mutations wouldn’t confer resistance.

In short, an ideal drug🎯
3/

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
In contrast to other SARS-CoV-2 drugs (remdesivir, Molnupiravir) which are nucleoside analogs, protease inhibition (PI) should have fewer off target effects. (E.g. No risk of mutagenesis).

Also analogous PI drugs are very effective against HIV & HCV. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protease_…
4/
Building on work with SARS-CoV1 (which has a 100% identical Mpro catalytic site) researchers developed potent covalent inhibitors of the viral Mpro: PF-07321332

(Sidebar: “electrophilic warhead” would be an excellent name for a band)
5/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33054210/?dopt…
After development of candidate Mpro inhibitors in vitro, the drug showed promise in mouse models.🐁

First in human trials (NCT04756531) began in February 2021. These studies found an effective Cmax and tolerable AE profile.🤞
5/
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04…
The Evaluation of Protease Inhibition in COVID-19 High Risk Patients (EPIC-HR) study was begun in July 2021.

It was a n=3000 blinded RCT comparing PF-07321332 vs placebo. It was performed at 359 sites in the 🇺🇸 & other countries (🇧🇷🇨🇴🇯🇵 🇲🇾🇰🇷 & others)
6/
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04…
Sidebar: Why combine w/ ritonavir esp since lopinavir/ritonavir wasn't effective against COVID19?

They added Ritonavir not for anti-viral effects but to "boost" drug levels of PF-07321332 by inhibiting CYP3A. We do something analogous w/ "ritonavir boosted darunavir" in HIV.
7/
EPIC-HR enrolled "high risk" COVID19 patient w/i 5 days of symptoms.

High risk was defined as ≥ 1 high risk condition by CDC criteria (cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…)

Notably they are doing similar trials in standard risk pts (EPIC-SR) & post exposure prophylaxis (EPIC-PEP)
8/
The primary endpoint of EPIC-HR was hospitalization or death within 28 days of randomization.
Secondary endpoints were pretty much what you'd expect (resolution of symptoms, clearance of virus, longer term outcomes, and adverse effects).
9/
The trial record and statistical plan seem normal & rigorous.

As far as I can see no🚩 in the study design or protoocl changes. (admittedly I'm reading quickly & having worked overnight in the ICU!)
10/
The results of PF-07321332 vs placebo were impressive! So impressive that EPIC-HR was stopped early by IDMC/FDA at interim analysis.

Hospitalizations
6/607 (1%) vs 41/612 (6.7%) [p<0.0001]

28 Day mortality
0/389 (0%) vs 10/385 (1.6%) [p<0.0001]
pfizer.com/news/press-rel…
11/
Overall this was an 89% reduction in the composite outcome of death/hospitalization.
A NNT of 17 to prevent a hospitalization & a NNT of 62 to prevent a death.

& the pre-specified subgroup of patients who presented sooner (within 3 days of symptom onset) did even better.
12/
Only limited safety data provided:
Of 1881 pts, side effects "most of which were mild" were 19% w/ PF-07321332 vs 21% w/ placebo

There were fewer severe AEs w/ drug than placebo: 1.7% vs. 6.6%, & discontinuation due to side effect was more common with placebo: 2.1% vs. 4.1%
13/
Bottom line:
-the anti-viral PF-07321332 seems promising in vitro
-there were significant reductions in hospitalizations & mortality in a large phase 2/3 RCT; these are clinically meaningful effects
-I'm excited to see more data when they go to the FDA later this month!
14/14

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Mark MD

Nick Mark MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickmmark

Jun 1
Well designed RCT shows patients randomized to an exercise program had substantially improved survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.
- 5 yr disease-free survival 80.3% vs
73.9% (HR 0.72)
- 8 yr overall survival 90.3% vs 83.2% (HR 0.63)

This is groundbreaking!
1/ Image
Some deets on the CHALLENGE trial

A 55 center trial done over 15 years (2009-2024) that randomized n=889 people with resected colon cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy to either:
- participate in a structured exercise program
- or to receive health-education materials alone

2/
The intervention was pretty comprehensive:
Personal activity consultant (PACs) - essentially trainers - got to know the participant 1:1, introduced them to the gym and came up with personalized activity goals
Regular every 2 week sessions helped participants reach the goals

3/ Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
May 18
Tragic news today about former president Biden's prostate cancer diagnosis. I wish him well.

As someone who follows presidential health reporting, I noticed something odd: unlike his predecessors, Biden's physician's never reported PSA.

How to interpret this absence? A🧵
1/ Image
Image
Image
Image
There are two possibilities:
1️⃣ Biden’s PSA was never checked
2️⃣ Biden’s PSA was checked but it wasn't reported

Strictly speaking, not checking PSA could be a medically correct option. Whether or not to test PSA is a complex question and is not the topic of this thread.

2/
Like many VIPs, presidents tend to have excessive testing that is not always strictly evidence-based.

For example, Bush 43 had an exercise treadmill test and a TB test for no apparent reason.

3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
May 4
In honor of #MayThe4thBeWithYou let's consider the most difficult airways in the Star Wars universe:

1. Darth Vader
Species: human
Vader presents several challenges: Vent dependent at baseline, airway burns from Mustafar, limited neck mobility.
Discuss GOC before saving him Image
2. Fodesinbeed Annodue
Species: Trog
All airways require teamwork, but intubating Fodesinbeed Annodue's two heads really will require two operators.
Consider double simultaneous awake fiberoptic intubation
Be sure to consent both heads. Image
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum & challenging airways than Mos Eisley (except maybe at Jabba's)

3.Greedo
Species: Rodian
Micrognathia, posterior airway, no nasal intubation, green skin so no pulse ox
Approach: VL + bronchoscope. Intubate quickly (shoot first) Image
Read 23 tweets
Mar 9
Every year, there is a predictable spike in fatal car accidents, medical errors, & heart attacks.

It’s estimated that there are thousands of excess deaths, a 1% increase in energy consumption, & billions of dollars in lost GDP.

The cause? Daylight savings transitions.

🧵

1/ Image
Earth's axis of rotation and orbital axis are not precisely aligned. The 23.5 degree difference - 'axis tilt' - gives us our seasons and a noticeable difference in day length over the course of the year.

2/
For millennia this seasonal variation was an accepted fact of life.

In 1895, George Hudson, a New Zealand entomologist, was annoyed that less afternoon light meant less time for bug collecting.

He realized that clocks could be adjusted seasonally to align with daylight.

3/ Image
Read 27 tweets
Feb 14
Musk is so stupid. Exhibit #10544

There aren’t thousands of 150 year olds getting paid social security. There are null values in a database he doesn’t understand how to read… Image
When unidentified people get admitted to the hospital the default DOB is 1/1/1900. The EHR shows their age as 125 yo.

But *almost* everyone is smart enough to understand this is just a result of missing data… Image
Nice summary here debunking Elon’s “duplicate SSNs” claim.

thedatageneralist.com/elon-musk-does…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 8
Important point re indirects:

Unlike other Trump moves, this is arguably GOOD news for researchers!

If the NIH budget is unchanged (a big if), this allocates more money to researchers; if you go from an indirect of 75% to 15% it means you can fund 3 grants instead of 2.
Some context:

Between 1947 and 1965, indirect rates ranged from 8% to 25% of total direct costs. In 1965, Congress removed most caps. Since then indirects have steadily risen.

2/
A lot of indirects go to thing like depreciation of facilities not paying salaries of support staff.

This accounting can be a little misleading.

If donors build a new $400m building, the institution can depreciate it & “lose” $20m/year over 20 years. Indirects pay this.

3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(