Sweden's financial regulator just released an article in which the director-general concludes that if cryptocurrency mining via Proof-of-Work is allowed in Sweden, we'll run out of renewable energy and endanger our chances of meeting our Paris Agreement climate responsibilities.
He reached this conclusion by, according to my read, googling @DigiEconomist and @CambridgeAltFin stats by himself and the director-general of the Environmental Protection Agency. They now recommend that the EU starts an investigation to "ban Proof-of-Work mining".
They also conclude that there are other ways to mine cryptocurrency which wastes 99.95% less energy and maintains the *same* functionality.
I wonder if the Swedish financial regulator googles himself to conclusions in all complex areas of finance and sends those conclusions as recommendations to the EU.
To make matters worse, our central bank @riksbanken
released an even more dumbfounding statement 2 days ago in their 2021 Payments Report.
The report claims that "one bitcoin transaction produces as much CO2 emissions as one person's flight across the entire Europe".
Yay Ripple, I guess?
@riksbanken why didn't you announce that you hired this woman as your Research Assistant? Disclaimers like that should be put front and center, guys.
In the spirit of not spending too much energy both @finansinsp and @riksbanken have released papers with massive amounts of Proof-of-no-Work behind them.
Thanks for saving energy when doing your research, and thereby saving the planet.
Challenging the statements by the Swedish authorities is a thankless, endless job that I’ve been partly working on in vain for many years. My thesis now is that Sweden will revisit its stance on cryptocurrencies when enough other countries do, probably starting with the US.
Start with winning the fight in the US. Then we’ll have a chance here.
For example, medical cannabis was a death drug in Sweden for a long time, then the US changed its stance. Now it is socially acceptable to have cannabis-liberal views in most contexts, atleast medical ones.
I look forward to the day I can be proud over being Swedish again. Today is not that day.
Or who knows. And why be proud of being a citizen anywhere anyway. Maybe let’s just go and live wherever fits us best and not pay to sustain slow-brained governments.
Making a high-throughput L1 to reduce gas cost is a bit like making a road wider to reduce traffic
In reality, the wider road makes more people think ”oh I can take my car to work now instead of commuting!” => traffic re-clogs => it takes exactly as long to get to work as before
In reality, a wider road does not reduce the time it takes to get to work. It only allows more people to endure the same level of traffic at the same time.
What you need in order to solve the traffic problem is more roads, coming in from different directions to the city.
Intuition: if everyone had their own road into the city, there would be no traffic.
SHIB is better than DOGE because it doesn’t suffer from DOGE’s Litecoin merge-mining problem, its inflationary nature and isn’t as sensitive to Elon’s tweets. And also piggybacks and integrates directly with the world’s most common token standard and developed DeFi ecosystem.
DOGE isn’t going to help out to rejuvenate the renewables industry and isn’t going to facilitate controllable load to strengthen the power grid through controllable load as other PoW coins like bitcoin could. No industrial efforts are being focused on DOGE mining.
In fact, Scrypt ASICs are so behind the curve and development is nowhere near plateauing (as opposed to Bitcoin mining where an Antminer S9 would have served you 5 yrs despite focused industrial efforts) a continued expansion of DOGE would lead to mountains of mining scrap waste.
it’s both fascinating and disappointing to see how my brain went from seeing a cryptopunk avi and thinking ”oh so this is a bandwagon guy with no sense of originality/taste, typical crypto garbage waste tool of a person” to ”neat, wonder if it’s real, that guy fucks”. ffs brain
i don’t see status symbols in anything, there is no car, watch, house or even physical fitness that will make me think ”oh who’s that” and now a pixelated ugly ass profile pic triggers this response? so disappointed
i suppose what i respect is that they had the conviction and foresight not to sell this garbage thing, understanding that it would become the status symbol it is today/alternatively buying it at a ridicolous price, having convicition the top wasn’t in? i would’ve sold it at $100k