1. You lockdown (to save hospitals anyway), they say "you're killing the economy".
2. NZ avoids COVID for a year, they say "NZ wasted billions now that they have some cases". Although NZ economy was just fine this past year.
It's all trolling.
NZ stayed positive
US (example) negative 4%
Canada negative 5%
I should have said "did much better than others" not "just fine". My error.
Also do you see the "elimination" straw man? Not much to do but recognize and ignore these idiot/biased trolls.
And I highly doubt NZ "wasted billions" and certainly not more than we lost in lost GDP.
Canada lost 0.1 trillion = 100 billion dollars.
Or, put another way, our public health just blew 100 billion dollars.
I'm gonna click that fourth one for sure
Search results I can get behind.
Trust MTV to bring the goods
1.5 billion buys you 6.3 billion chicken nuggets (with sauce).
So Canada just blew ~66 x 6.4 billion chicken nuggets = ~422 billion chicken nuggets.
I'm sad now, and I don't even like chicken nuggets.
Lining up 422 billion chicken nuggets end to end reaches the moon 27.9 times.
Only about 1/14th of the way to the Sun though.
Not sure if the closest ones would get nice and toasty then. Might be better to use the toaster oven.
@ExtroSpecteur I presume he is saying airborne mitigations should be equally alongside touch or droplet.
No, there is no evidence for any. As I keep saying, but happy to say again, for thousands of years people flipflopped between "it's touch" and "it floats but generates in swamps because ...
@ExtroSpecteur ... they did not understand pathogens. Once they did, referring to respiratory illness, they simply assumed it was droplet because most infections can be traced to an infected having been near the index case. Droplet became an idea with Chapin in 1910, to explain why one needed..
@ExtroSpecteur ...to be close. However, first, their idea of droplet was not necessarily 2 metres. Their idea of airborne was many kilometers, so their discussion of close has to be understood in this context. Two, their investigations were crude, by the 30s air people like Wells
It's always funny to me that virologists get everything and transmission so wrong. I guess because they work with viruses they think they know everything about them. 🤷
The sad part is we would assume that because they work with viruses they know everything about them.
*everything about
Virologists don't really work on transmission. Maybe sometimes they spin a tub and flip some in the air or something. But they don't really know what's going on. And then the doctors know the biological clinical side of things but they don't work on transmission either.
Just remember the ladder of denial and elite panic myth means if you are hearing a 2 it's a 4. If a 4 it's a 6. If a 6 pack your bags. You'll never hear 8 and up the TV will just play static