20/ Talking about food & the infallibility of things considered “science”
An excellent statement:
“The difference between a science & a pseudoscience is that scientific statements can be proven wrong & pseudoscientific statements cannot.”
- Robert Youngson
21/ The authors then point out that almost all “social sciences” - by this definition - fall into pseudoscience
Compare psychoanalytic theories of Freud to physics & chemistry.
The latter are Hard Sciences that (theoretically) deal in Hard Truths
Wait! I can see your hands up.
22/ Yes, The Hard Sciences are manipulates all the time. I suspect we’ll get to that later.
But for now, stick with my by the broad distinction of “Hard” vs “social” sciences
Here comes a disturbing POV from a PR person (referred to as a “spinmeister”):
23/
Reporter: Do you serve your client, or the truth?
John Scanlon: You always try- you always serve the truth...but the truth is not necessarily a solid. It can be a liquid...whose truth are we talking abou, your truth or my truth?
How post-modernist.
His answer is so meta😂
24/ Unexpected twist: while taking these pics to show what a scumbag he is, the last example was him attacking none other than POTUS (this book was 2001)
As the authors point out, having “a position” is NOT the same as telling the truth
Just ask any NYT / WaPo reporter - ZING!
25/ Other PR magnates go even farther:
“There is no truth except the truth you create for yourself.” - R. EdeIman
“Marketing is a battle of perception... the truth has no bearing on the issue.” - Jack Trout
But they know enough not to lie with something *demonstrably* false
26/ “To lie is to respect reality enough to falsify it. [PR practitioners] do not falsify the truth because they do not believe that it even exists.”
Review above where the M$M doesn’t even investigate, just parrots what PR people give them
Is it any wonder we’re in such shit?
27/ And speaking of shit
They engage in gaslighting to such a HUGE degree
that *even if they dump toxic sludge in people’s neighborhoods which made kids sick*
that they consider people phobic or mentally ill if they resist or complain
Because there’s no such thing as “Truth”
28/ Because We The People are so dumb & irrational
[They] have to have Experts do the thinking for us
How often have we heard THIS:
29/ This is largely why I think we’re seeing things unfold the way they are
So many people think they’re “thinking” when they’re regurgitating
The PIan isn’t just for smart/responsible people
As I laid out in this mini-thread: Define “Awakening”
33/ Wow, the timing of this tweet by @drefanzor could not have been more perfect
Synchronicity
Define “Awakening”
34/ Interestingly, some PR people actually consider the ethics side of their work
& promptly go ahead defending EvilCo or whatever anyway
Main point: there is a multi-million dollar industry to convince us evil shit is ok
Jim Lukaszewski posted some past jobs by his spin firm:
35/ People like Jim must either be delusional or purely psychopathic
B/C they claim “unconditional honesty” is the only way his firm will work
which is achieved not by answering the concerns of the complainants
but by teaching clients how to redirect the conversation
36/ Literallt, his guidance is
-Write down the Questions you’re afraid of
-When they ask those questions, here’s how you change the subject & avoid answering altogether
This is considered “open & unconditional honesty”
Back to postmodernism: there is no Truth
Which=No morals
37/ Their methodologies are all about studying psychological impact of words
& creating a new lexicon to reinforce/manipulate public perception
Example: the creation of “sweetspeak” to get people to accept Aspertame/Nutrasweet
Again: people are too dumb to know what’s good
38/ The above “battle” of various foods became a Behind-The-Scenes war of puppet “think tanks” attacking each other
The Olestra/Nutrasweet team got Conservative Think Tanks to attack the “nanny state” when health organizations showed the food was disgustingly unhealthy
39/ They used classic “3rd Party” techniques (make it come from some one else’s mouth)
to suggest that anyone pointing out certain foods were unhealthy were infringing on our freedoms
trying to decide for us what to eat
Like the cigarette/“torches of freedom” method
40/ They use the same playbooks over & over for a simple reason:
It almost always works
& as we’ve learned
they’re really just fighting for market share
None of them actually gives a fuck about our well-being
41/ The important thing here is not to say “So what, I already know that these people are assholes”
The point is to recognize their tactics in both large & small ways when they happen in your life
Because once you can see HOW people manipulate, you’re unlikely to forget it.
42/ The next chapter gets very fucking savage
& points out how the above Simple Steps are used to not only avoid responsibility for deaths
but to continue practices that result in horrific, lingering sicknesses & death for the Trusting Populace
SiIicitis & Lead, specifically
43/ The authors start out with a story of more people dying in a single mining town
than died on the Titanic
from an illness that not only was ignored by the bosses
but fortunes were spent on trying to discredit & gaslight the families of the sick & dead workers
44/ These miners were drilling through basically pure glass in tight spaces
no precautions taken, not even masks
& if they said they had trouble breathing,
doctors lied, purposely misdiagnosed them, & gave them sugar pills
The below sentence w/ a blacked out word...no words
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is something that always bugged me, but now I see it as a more deliberate effort to kill human spirituality
I’ll get briefly into how this may tie into a bigger philosophical battle (which comes down to Tesla vs Einstein, as well as what’s crassly called “Eastern vs Western thinking”)
but I wanted to start with an example that I’ve had with me since the days I was a devout Catholic.
You may know the story of the Fatima Marian apparitions.
The *very* short version:
- the Virgin Mary reportedly appeared to 3 Catholic children multiple times in Fatima, Portugal in 1917.
- Mary met with the children regularly on the 13th of each month, then said to bring lots of people for a final miracle to prove the kids were telling the truth.
- On 13 October 1917 (their story now a huge deal) tens of thousands of people showed up
- It was reported that the sun began to dance in the sky & emit rays of color. Some stories say that - while it was soggy from rain - the sun appeared to zoom towards the earth & dried the ground & the people.
- Mary also reportedly told the children they needed to pray for Russia - this was 6 months before the Bolsheviks performed their massacre in Russia.
The Church didn’t recognize the Fatima events as “supernatural” until 1930.
But the Vatican & its propaganda is a whole other angle - as is the whole subject of Marian apparitions.
I have no opinion on the legitimacy & I haven’t been Catholic for over 15 years.
I want to focus on the skeptics & scientific “explanations”.
There are three types of “explanations”:
- Mass hysteria/seeing what you want to believe
- Looking at the sun caused mass vision problems
- there was atmospheric interference (either from the Sahara or the classic “swamp gases” causing a wavy effect)
I want to focus on this last one, because it - more than anything else - shows just how ridiculous the “skeptical” approach to things is.
So let’s say it was swamp gases or the Sahara that happened to impact the atmosphere.
At that exact time when the kids said a sign would occur.
Now, some skeptics laugh up their sleeve at religious people, & joke about how we’d all be dead if the sun moved all around - or the whole world would’ve seen it.
It boggles the mind just how insanely these people imagination.
If you were to believe in an entity powerful enough to *physically* move the sun, would it be outrageous to think it could break as many so-called “laws of nature” as it wanted?
Again, I don’t have a dog in this fight, but that has to be the STUPIDEST argument I’ve ever heard.
As for the mass hysteria/bias confirmation, I acknowledge that could be possible.
But I want to focus on the “it WuZ SuMtHiNg eXpLaiNaBLe” position.
If the atmospheric disturbance is truly their argument, you know what *isn’t* explainable?
The fact that a massive visual disruption of one of the most constant things in our life (the sun) occurred *exactly* when these children said there’d be a sign that everyone present would see.
Statistically, that timing is damn near incalculable.
But that’s glossed over.
They don’t consider that - if a Deity were to get involved - they might use a method that didn’t involve ACTUALLY moving the entire sun.
Why wouldn’t a Deity actually use natural effects PLUS timing?
If I’m a Deity, & I say “Show up at X at exactly this time & you’ll get a sign” - 10,000+ people then see something insanely rare occur at that time,
… & then some people go “YeAh bUt it wUz the sAhARa”, I’d have to declare them to be massive fucking idiots, or extremely disingenuous.
Kind of like the way some people seem to miss all the different faces Buyden has, or the whole C0VlD & Jab scam.
This leads me to the 2nd problem:
Modern Science’s worship of the Mechanical Universe
2/ Now: how does that tie in with Nikola Tesla vs Einstein?
First: the short answer (make sure you check out the video my good fren @DamonRiddle3 is QTing here):
3/ The nutshell of this is that at the beginning of the 20th century, Physicists had a choice between 2 paths
& THEY CHOSE THE WRONG ONE.
I’m not a physicist, but my understanding is that Einstein basically built upon & “improved” (heavy irony in my use of that word) Newtonian Physics.
For those who also aren’t physics people, you’re in luck: you have this dummy to explain it, dumbly 😂
Newton & Einstein’s physics models are also called “classical mechanics”. It is (as you can guess) very mechanical 😂
It’s good enough that it works with most of the stuff humans need to calculate (*or so we have been told*…more on that later). Supposedly, Newton invented calculus to see if he could measure the moon “falling” towards earth.
But as you get into larger & more abstract calculations, the model falls apart.
And so they have to (literally) MAKE UP constants to plug into their calculations, in order to make the math work.
Just a “we’ll just put this in there & figure it out later”… then proceeded to never figure it out.
(I am *hugely* oversimplifying, of course)
You want to know what one of those “constants” is?
The so-called “Dark Matter”. They literally have NO PROOF that it exists, but they need it to make the math work. (H/T again to @DamonRiddle3 - any errors are 150% my lack of understanding)
[FYI, this *does* connect to the Fatima stuff above - I’ll get there!]
So for the last century, we’ve used math that was “good enough”… but we Peons have been trying to solve a puzzle with half the pieces missing… & it’s not an accident.
I don’t need to tell you that technology (most notably Tesla’s) has been suppressed, as well as anti-gravity tech discovered by the German National Socialist Party waaaaaay back in the 1940s.
(I’ll link to some amazing threads by Mr Wolf & @1FreeInhabitant amazing threads on that subject below as well)