Seeing a lot of summary of the Infrastructure package we passed Friday night. Some accurate, some goofy, lots with opinion masquerading as fact. So herewith a thread on what's in, what's in the BBB and why it's in 2 separate bills:
1/ First, remember that Biden campaigned on transforming our hard and soft infrastructure. After getting elected, he gave us his American Jobs Plan as a framework. See here for details: whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
2/ It was ambitious. Highways and bridges, yes. But also lower drug costs, address the climate crisis, expand access to education, housing and broadband, slash child poverty... and much more.
3/ POTUS first asked the Senate to get as much of that done as they could on a bipartisan basis. Their work product is the bill we passed in the House on Friday. (Thus the "Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal").
4/ There is lots of good stuff in the BID. Repairs and modernization of roads, bridges, airports and ports. Build out of a national EV charging network. Electric transmission capacity upgrades. Massively expanded access to high speed internet
5/ Two bills of mine were included - the BEST Act, to deploy grid-energy storage technology and better use intermittent renewables and the Clean Industrial Technology act to deploy tech in hard-to-decarbonize industries (steel, cement, fertilizer, etc)
6/ However, it was not complete. Not because we wanted to do this in two bills, but because when you prioritize bipartisanship in DC, there are many things that don't get prioritized. Sadly.
7/ There is no @GOP support for legislation that addresses the climate crisis, lowers prescription drug costs, cuts child poverty, expands access to housing, removes fossil fuel subsidies, expands access to education.
8/ That's tragic, but the reality of the current (elected) GOP. So all those provisions in the President's agenda were left on the cutting floor as the BID was assembled. And it is those pieces that were pulled into the separate bill, the Build Back Better Act.
9/ We have NOT yet passed the BBBA. Friday, we voted only to advance the rule so that we can finalize and pass in the next week (ish). But that bill will have to pass on a straight party-line vote through reconciliation, since there are no Senate Rs who will support.
10/ To be sure, the BBBA does not include everything in POTUS' agenda either. Some was cut at the request of Dem members who see bipartisanship as a goal rather than a path. Such is the nature of politics. But lots is still there.
11/ One can simultaneously lament that the BBBA is not big enough to tackle the climate crisis and still celebrate that it will be the most impactful climate bill ever passed by the US Congress. Ditto for child poverty, affordable housing and so much more.
12/ The debate you saw taking place in the Dem party last week wasn't a debate about goals. It was, a debate about whether House Dems could trust the Senate to fight for Biden's agenda. Because once we pass BID, we depend on those fragile 50 votes in the Senate to pass BBBA.
13/ We have now given them that trust. But many of us remain very skeptical. Don't blow this, Senate. Way, way, way too much is at stake.
14/ It's also worth noting that this whole package is not nearly as big as it looks. US GDP is $20T/year. Increasing federal investments by a few trillion over 10 years is not nothing - but the scale is nowhere near big enough to crowd out private spending.
15/ That matters for any inflation concerns. But also matters because it made it relatively easy to fully pay for. This package will reduce federal deficits because the added spending was addressed with minor offsetting increases in revenues.
16/ Those included small increases in taxes to the wealthy that do not fully undo the prior dude's tax cuts. There are no tax increases for anyone earning <$400K/yr. A big revenue source is simply increasing IRS budgets to address under-collection of taxes due under current law.
17/ Other significant revenue sources are changes to reduce corporations ability to declare revenue in low-cost foreign jurisdictions and dodge US taxes due - and initiatives to lower drug costs for seniors, which saves Medicare $.
18/ (As an aside, that's even after factoring in expanded Medicare coverage so that hearing will be covered. I fought to include hearing, dental and vision expansions. As Meatloaf says, one outa three ain't bad.)
19/ If you want to criticize the BID or BBBA, you can reasonably complain that they are not sufficient. We didn't do enough to address the climate crisis, to make higher ed affordable, to lower drug costs. And our tax system is still tilted too far in favor of the wealthy.
20/ But it's still transformative. And the fact that we didn't get everything is the nature of our political process.
21/ So for now, celebrate the BID. Fight like hell to make sure the Senate doesn't drop the ball on the BBBA. Then show a little love to all who will benefit from this once in a generation investment. And then get back to work. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

2 Nov
Today, I continued my commitment to vote against any bill sponsored by members of Congress who watched what happened on January 6 and then voted with the seditionists to overturn the will of the people. If you want to know why, read this: washingtonpost.com/politics/inter…
I have no more or less right to my opinion than any of my colleagues, and even on areas of strong disagreement I would never hold their opinions against them. Such is the nature of a democracy, which it is my honor to serve in and my oath to protect.
But January 6 was different. On that day, 138 House Republicans voted to overturn an election. Voted against the very principle we all took an oath to defend. Voted against democracy.
Read 11 tweets
24 Oct
More damning information about Facebook, this time in India. But it's important to understand that this is a VERY fixable problem. The algorithm cannot be simultaneously optimized for FB revenue AND not encouraging extremism. Brief thread: washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
1/ Remember not that long ago in the pre-algorithmic era of social media when your feed was family members and whoever else was in your friend circle / feed, posting content as it happened.
2/ You can still do that on Twitter. Click this little icon and enable "See Latest Tweets". Presto, algo gone. FB doesn't let you do that. You see what their algo wants you to see. Image
Read 15 tweets
23 Oct
As is this: Political leaders can move public opinion. Some politicians use that for good. Some use it for evil. And some say "well, I would love to do X, but my polling says I can't." That third group is unfit to lead. But the 2nd group is culpable.
That said, a politician yelling hatred into the void is one thing. A politician yelling hatred into an FB algorithm that sees someone who engages with it and says "I see you like Mo Brooks. Might I introduce you to the Proud Boys?" is something else entirely.
Read 7 tweets
20 Oct
And now, I bring you a public service announcement to pre-but the arguments that seem to be gaining traction suggesting (falsely) that current gas price volatility is caused by renewables. Buckle up... Thread:
1/ First, the case being made by the fossil shills: Intermittent renewables (read: wind and solar) need balancing capacity on the grid. Only quick ramping, inefficient gas plants can provide that so as Rs are deployed, gas demand goes up and increases price.
2/ That is a real thing and not without it's merits. If that were driving demand, it would be pretty easy to spot in the data, because we'd see rising gas demand. Trouble is, we don't. eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n…
Read 21 tweets
17 Oct
Appalachian politicos never really cared about the miners. The proof? Name one who ever complained about the investments in mining productivity. Longwall mining, mountaintop removal all slashed labor requirements/mined ton.
To be clear, rising labor productivity is good to the extent it allows us to create more wealth per labor hour (and subject to making sure that wealth is shared). But you can't celebrate rising productivity in the coal sector and lament it in the larger energy sector.
Coal is a uniquely labor-intensive fuel. The industry has worked hard to cut their labor needs, first through automation, then through bankrupting miner's pensions. But all pushes to lower cost, less labor-intensive energy eventually squeeze out coal as a fuel.
Read 4 tweets
16 Oct
If you care about the planet. If you care about US leadership. If you care about our children. If you care about affordable energy. If you care about our democracy. Then it's time to mobilize. So, so much is at stake. Thread: nytimes.com/2021/10/15/cli…
1/ The CEPP is the most impactful part of the Build Back Better Act from a climate perspective. It puts our electric sector on a path to zero emissions. To take it out is to decide that climate change isn't a problem.
2/ It's also MASSIVE for job creation. Meeting those goals require the construction of ~1000 GW of new power generation in the next decade. That is as much as we already have. Millions of good jobs and economic growth. To take out the CEPP is to give labor the middle finger.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(