5 things Labour need to do

1. Always refer to Brexit as "Tory Brexit" (every single Labour MP and peer, every time it comes up).

2. Be much more vocally critical of Tory Brexit. Not Brexit. Tory Brexit.

3. Clearer improvements to the deal.

4. Big bold electoral pacts.

5. PR.
Yes, Labour voted Tory Brexit through.

So what? As we have seen countless times when it comes to the Tories, political stances change.

"We're not trying to rejoin the EU but we want to reverse the damage being caused by Tory Brexit."

Seems pretty straightforward.
And in response to the inevitable next question:

"We believe in honouring the result of the referendum. That's why, when Boris Johnson assured the country he had an oven-ready Tory Brexit, we decided to give him a fair chance to try to implement it. He has demonstrably failed."
We can't go straight from Brexit back to EU membership.

We could go from Tory Brexit to less damaging Brexit to even less damaging Brexit to EU membership. (Or at least to a Norway-like situation, which wouldn't be so bad.)

But if we don't take that first step...
Part of the process should be to watch individual polls like a hawk.

So when one indicates that eg even Leavers (by a large margin) want to protect existing food standards, you immediately add that to the list of Brexit improvements you promise.
Only 52% of a subset of registered voters wanted any kind of Brexit (everything from Norway-like to hard WTO).

Some of those 52% are disillusioned with the result. Some are bored. Some have died.

It was enough for a 2016 referendum win. It's not enough to prop up Tory Brexit.
Here's a magnificent thread collating 1,000 examples of Brexit damage over the space of just a few months.

Why isn't Labour doing that sort of work? Why aren't they calling out each failing, and keeping a very public tally?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡

Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @uk_domain_names

7 Nov
Sajid Javid and the Tories are complaining not enough people have been coming forward for booster shots.

But there's an incredibly good reason for it: the system doesn't allow it.

The rule is you have to be at least 190 days past your second dose. 190 days ago was 1 May... Image
To clarify the above graph further...

Of the 20,289,126 people over 50 in England who've already had 2 doses of the vaccine, almost half (9,880,189) were given their second dose too recently for the booster booking system to allow them to book that extra shot.
Of course, that's only the data for England. And there will be people outside the over-50s category who are also eligible for a booster because of an underlying health issue.

But the fact remains that the vast majority of eligible people have had it. The rest are forced to wait.
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
"I never realised we were going to incur all these costs. We were told it was going to be free trade."

Comment from fisherman who regrets voting Leave can be read two ways. Free = frictionless, but also = no cost. Some people may have thought the latter?
theguardian.com/business/2021/…
If your instant reaction is "how can anyone be so foolish!" take a deep breath and a step back, stop, and REALLY think about it.

What would "free trade" sound like to someone immersed in their work/life and with no interest in politics (shock news: most people don't care much)?
The fact that you're reading this thread at all means you're in the minority of people who do care.

But that creates the "don't think of a pink elephant" problem: because it's obvious to you, it's impossible to see how it couldn't be equally obvious to others.
Read 6 tweets
1 Nov
Here's the website for the Festival of Brexit (aka £120 million taxpayer cash spaff). It's been rebranded 'Unboxed' in the vain hope people will forget its origin.

WARNING: If you scroll too quickly down the page, you'll need a sick bag. Startling strobe!
unboxed2022.uk
How can anyone think that spending £120 million so that the 52% who already ruined all our lives can lord it over the 48% represents money well spent?

Feed. Hungry. Children. Instead.

Here's an article with more info about this chameleonic travesty.
timeout.com/news/the-festi…
BTW, I didn't read every word of every page, but I did have a jolly good peek around the Festival website and there's no mention of Brexit anywhere.

The Tory press release doesn't mention Brexit either.

Funny that, isn't it?
gov.uk/government/new…
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
What Labour should say to the Tories about Brexit:

"You told us you had an oven-ready deal. We chose to respect the referendum result by letting you try to implement it. Subsequent events have shown that it was a rotting mess. It is time to reverse the damage you've inflicted."
That instantly defangs the "But you voted for it too..." accusation.

They can lean hard on a sense of fair play:

"Given the large Tory majority and the original outcome of the referendum, it seemed prudent to let you implement a deal that you assured the public was oven-ready."
"But now that it has become clear beyond any doubt that what the British people were promised was not what they got, we feel compelled to step in."

etc. etc. etc.
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
Calling all French-speakers... Is my translation accurate?

NOTE: This is the paragraph from a longer letter that has been causing so much trouble over the last few hours, with many journalists claiming France wants to "damage" the UK.

(Original above, my translation below.)
More context, if you're coming on this story fresh...
Here's the BBC, seemingly relying on the original false translation...
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-591011…
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
Politico's reputation crumbles with stunts like this. If you speak French, you'll see there's been a deliberate mistranslation of what the letter said, in order to stir the pot on Brexit.

(If it's not deliberate then it's incompetent. Most news media took their cues from it.)
But then, Alex Wickham is alleged to be a godparent to Johnson's kid, so there's a very tangled wev there...
spectator.co.uk/article/inside…
Even our Brexit useful idiot in chief is quoting this false translation, and using it to attack the EU...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(