I've got just enough time to answer another question from last week's photography talk with @LCMSDS.
This one is from @crg498: "Rider-Rider is an interesting surname. What can you tell us about his background and family history?"
Rider-Rider IS an unusual surname. So much so, that I’ve had a TON of trouble finding much about his genealogy. We know that he married a Rosina Ada Hill and that they had a son together less than 9 months later.
What did they name that babe? William Rider-Rider, of course.
Seriously, of all the photographers, R-R is the one for whom I have the least genealogical information.
I've got far more on his wife, Rosina Ada, who was blessed with a less ridiculous surname.
R-R got his start in photography when someone gave him an inexpensive camera and he got the photo bug. He made it his goal to work hard enough to get a really good camera and become a pro.
He worked for a press agency at first, and they’d send him out for shots if they didn’t have something they needed. He decided to just go ahead and apply at a paper.
As a result, Rider-Rider got a job in 1910 working for Ivor Castle at the Daily Mirror.
They would both later become official photographers for the Canadian Corps, though neither was Canadian.
R-R also tells us decades after the war how much he hated Castle🤣
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, let's talk about some handy tips to determine whether #FWW photographs you might have at home are Canadian or British official 👇🏼🧵
Photograph is: Ivor Castle, A trench on the Canadian Front showing Trunk Holes, May 1917, private collection.
Photographs were available to private buyers in a number of ways - as postcards (Canadian official sold by the Daily Mirror), stereograph cards (Underwood and Underwood, Keystone), or even lantern slides (Newton).
War photography exhibitions date back to the mid-19th century. Some of the earliest included images of the Crimea and the US Civil War.
In recent decades, we've seen some excellent exhibitions of #warphotos, and I've listed a few catalogues here below 👇🏽
One of the most important texts that you need to check out is Anne Wilkes Tucker (et al’s) “War/Photography: Images of Armed Conflict and its Aftermath.” This exhibition was mounted at the MFA Houston in 2012.
War/Photography takes a thematic approach to how wars have been photographed across the decades.
It weighs about 28 lbs to carry, but it's worth the sore arms.
Today I’ve got a bunch of great memoirs - all written by early press photographers and all have links to download fo’ free!
(Photo by Emre Can Acer from Pexels)
To start, here's Herbert Baldwin's "A War Photographer in Thrace." Baldwin was later hired as Australia's official photographer for a brief time in the #FWW.
Grant was a photographer at the Daily Mirror who photographed the Balkan Wars before heading up to Belgium in August 1914 to cover the events unfolding there.
First of all, collectors do love to get their hands on vintage prints. In a lot of cases it means you've acquired a print made by the person who also took the negative. Having both would be a serious coup 👇🏻🧵
It's important to note that some photographers almost never made prints from their own negatives. Photojournalists are sometimes a good example of this.
First World War photographers had a hand in developing their negs, but they didn't make prints.
BUT having a 100+ year old print that's A) made with historic materials and B) lived a good long life and C) was printed by the same guy who did all the other prints has something that theorist Walter Benjamin calls the "aura."
It's not super weird that the NY Tribune published it nearly 2 years later. The New York Times' Midweek Pictorial also published photographs a little later than when they were taken (not always this late though).
An essay on the NYT photographs is on my long to-do list.
The research for it was, get this, FUNDED! Thanks @RICgallery, you are amazing.
I spend most of my time analyzing how #VimyRidge was represented in photographs, but every now and then I have to turn to text too.
A few things to point out in this 1917 article from the Canadian War Pictorial 👇🏻
One thing to admit: this is only one report of the battle but it was written by the Canadian War Records Office, and who was more likely to aggrandize this event than the Canadians who produced wartime propaganda?*
*Propaganda meant something v different in 1917. You can thank the SWW & rise of fascism for that.