Interesting thread, but I'm not sure this sort of rhetoric will get anyone's notice. Elected leaders are expected to say this stuff, so people tune them out.
The Twitter activists and media figures who people see -- rightly or wrongly -- as the true face of the progressive movement are not going to praise Columbus or say America is a great nation. So I don't think it really matters what Biden and Harris say here.
Biden already did this with "defund the police". He said, very clearly, from day 1, that he didn't want to defund the police.
But Republicans still run on the message that Democrats don't just want to defund the police, but did, in fact, already do it!
Of course Republicans who say that are lying. But they're able to get away with it because the Twitter activists and media figures who are the actual public face of the progressive movement didn't tone down their anti-police rhetoric until pretty recently.
What progressivism really needs in order to avoid being painted as an anti-American movement is for activists and media figures to say pro-American things -- not grudgingly, but loudly and repeatedly.
And to be frank, I don't think they're ready to do that yet.
It might take Republicans winning a few elections on a sunny, pro-American, Reaganesque sort of message (rather than Trump's dark, apocalyptic white-nationalism) in order to convince progressive Twitter activists and media figures that anti-Americanism is political poison.
But frankly, I don't think Republicans are there yet either. Maybe Glenn Youngkin is. Maaaaybe DeSantis. But it's still Trump's party, and Tucker Carlson's party. And they're still on their own anti-American kick.
Progressive activists and media figures still generally believe that America is a nation based on white supremacy.
And Trumpist activists and media figures believe America isn't really America *unless* it's based on white supremacy.
Meanwhile, the general public in America is still strongly pro-American. Even with national pride being near a record low, almost 70% of Americans are still "very" or "extremely" proud to be Americans.
This pro-American majority is so big that just capturing a little piece of it could lead to smashing electoral victories.
But while *politicians* are happy to pander to that majority, the online activists and media figures on both sides have little interest in doing so.
Whichever movement is the first to figure out how to tell Americans that their country is great while still feeling like they're true to their own hearts and their own principles will control this country for a generation, I think.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Imagine a future where this chart becomes standardized and every Hispanic or mixed-race person has to shout out their skin color number at the beginning of business meetings (so that blind people will know how to treat them).
I swear if this happens I will become Chris Rufo.
This country is just getting absolutely ridiculous
We're seeing a classic "thermostatic backlash" here, just like when Dems won a bunch of minor elections in 2017. Unless something big changes, a red wave in 2022 seems like a safe prediction at this point.
Also I do not think that Biden passing the BBB bill -- even a version of BBB untouched by Manchin! -- would have much effect on this, any more than the ARRA and ACA helped Dems avoid a wipeout in 2010.
I'm reading "The Sleepwalkers". About 10 minutes into the section about European politics, you realize that the question of why these people went to war has an obvious, boring answer: All of these people were just totally batshit insane.
Everyone in Britain, Russia, France and (eventually) Germany was just constantly thinking of how to conquer more of the world -- not even considering the possibility that that might not be a good goal. Very few of them were particularly afraid of war.
When you have a bunch of countries that are used to constantly trying to conquer more territory, and who aren't particularly afraid of war, you will get a war. It's not even a question. Asking "What if they hadn't gone to war?" is like asking "What if my dog hadn't pooped?".
The idea that "Japan is not really democratic" is very wrong. It is. The LDP occasionally does lose power, and doesn't use anti-democratic methods to prevent this. But the LDP is very good at triangulating on policy, so it bounces back.
Giving people a choice doesn't preclude that they'll make the same choice most of the time. The LDP plays the game fairly and usually wins, because it's generally pretty good at giving Japanese people what they want -- or at least, less bad than the opposition.
Most of the countries where one party usually (or always) wins have some sort of authoritarian structure that advantages the dominant party. Japan does not. This book is a little dated, but it basically explains why the LDP usually wins.