So missing the point.

In NYC, people who live in dangerous neighborhoods - primarily Black and Brown - often feel the need to carry a gun.

And they are the people who get prosecuted - not privileged people.

That's why public defenders supported this challenge to NY's gun laws.
People really don't understand how gun laws are enforced in New York.

They criminalize young Black and Brown people.
I don't think I have ever represented a White person charged with possession of a gun.

Not because they don't carry them, but because police are not smashing down their apartment doors to find them and they're not conducting illegal stops and searches.
Also because White people can get licenses to carry guns legally. Black people, often because they have had minor contacts with the criminal legal system, can't.
And the reality is a White person living in a nice neighborhood probably doesn't feel the need to carry a gun.
The people I represent who carry guns are usually teenagers and they have rarely ever used the guns tehy are charged with possessing. They are not in gangs. They live in NYCHA buildings and they carry the guns to protect themselves and their families.
That's the truth. And I am the first person to think gun control should be way stricter in this country. But I know the way to achieve that is not to criminalize young Black and Brown kids in NYC.
Do something that would change the gun culture that allows those White people in the South to carry semi-automatic weapons into Walmart or to storm State legislatures with guns.
Do something to change the socioeconomic conditions of Black and Brown people in NYC so teenagers here don't feel the need to carry guns for protection.
Educate people about gun violence. Something like 61% of gun deaths in this country are due to suicide. Cops killing Black and Brown people is gun violence. Teenagers possessing guns they don't use for protection is part of a larger problem, not *the problem.*
The penalty for possession of a gun (simple possession) for someone with no criminal record is 2 to 7 years in prison. Once you have two convictions for gun possession (again simple possession) or other felonies, you could potentially face a life sentence for a third gun charge.
This is not about being pro-guns. It is about being anti-criminalization as a way to resolve a complex issue.

So many criminal laws lead to mass incarceration - in NYC gun laws are one of the most obvious.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rebecca Kavanagh

Rebecca Kavanagh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrRJKavanagh

9 Nov
CW: Police violence

Police shot and killed an Indigenous man in Sydney today. This, just two days after another Indigenous man died in a prison located three hours outside of Sydney.

Indigenous peoples make up less than 5% of the Australian population.
smh.com.au/national/nsw/m…
Aboriginal people die in custody at a rate of 0.61 per 100,000 people. More than 55% of these people were in police custody or being pursued by police. A small number were remanded pre-trial (Australia does not have cash bail).

theguardian.com/australia-news…
In the US, Black people die in *police* custody at a rate of 0.60 per 100,000 people.

This does not include people who die in jail or prison, so the rate would be higher if those numbers were included.

I will look for the total figure.

journalistsresource.org/politics-and-g…
Read 4 tweets
7 Nov
Well this seems problematic - police need probable cause to pull you over for a traffic infraction *or* reasonable suspicion that a crime has been or is about to be committed. Neither exist here.

That's before we even get to, what the hell, this is what we pay cops to do?
The New York Constitution offers greater protection than the 4th Amendment protection against search and seizure. See People v Robinson 767 N.E.2d 638 (N.Y. 2001) and People v. Spencer, 646 N.E.2d 785 (N.Y. 1995).
DWI check points are allowed but they must be conducted pursuant to non-arbitrary, nondiscriminatory criteria. People v. Sobotker, 373 N.E.2d 1218 (N.Y. 1978).
Read 5 tweets
4 Nov
It's not just that only *one* Black juror has been seated in the trial of the three men charged with killing Ahmaud Arbery.

It's that the judge acknowledged the defense was using *intentional discrimination* in selecting jurors and did nothing about it.
cnn.com/2021/11/03/us/…
During jury selection, the defense and prosecution have unlimited challenges for cause - they simply have to show the judge why a juror would not be fair and impartial.
The defense and prosecution each then have a number of peremptory challenges where they can ask for a juror to be struck for any reason.

Except race. The reason has to be race-neutral.
Read 16 tweets
3 Nov
This analysis ignores the fact that White women benefit from White supremacy because of their race.

White women may be disempowered by their gender, but are empowered by racism.
I always go back to the brilliant book by @sejr_historian, "They Were Her Property: White Women as Slave Owners in the American South."
She says: “Most of us continue to see white women through the lens of gender. This allows for us to be optimistic about the possibility that their gendered oppression will allow for them to find common cause with other dispossessed groups.”
Read 5 tweets
23 Oct
Maybe we could just stop mythologizing people all together?
If RBG taught us anything it is that we have blind faith in liberal icons at our own peril.
For the record, I think RBG was racist and that Justice Sotomayor is a million times better jurist.

I also know she joined in this decision upholding child slavery (in which notorious conservative Justice Alito dissented). news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/su…
Read 6 tweets
23 Oct
So the DA has to reassure passengers who witnessed a woman being raped on a train that they won't be prosecuted for something that's not even a crime because the police whipped everyone into a frenzy where they're probably terrified of vigilante attacks. cnn.com/2021/10/21/us/…
How the police *do not* help solve sexual assault cases. By discouraging witnesses from coming forward.
Also, I really hate the way media are still not accurately reporting this story - the headline makes it sound like the DA has decided not to prosecute bystanders that they could and maybe should prosecute, when that's not the case at all.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(