Working out what the Labour Party's Brexit position should be is not complicated
It just requires a little ability to understand politics and communication, and a basic grasp of the UK electoral system
Oh and a little ability to see beyond what you, as an individual, want
🧵
In the halcyon days of UK politics (sure, quibble if these existed, but for our sakes here assume they do), it was a left-right two party game
Labour was left
Tories were right
Where you stood on that answered where you voted
First Past the Post meant that - nationally anyway - any other parties did not really get a look in
Whether you like it or not, two party politics, left-right, under first past the post was comparatively predictable
Then along comes Brexit
And drives a completely different cleavage through UK politics
The Tories position themselves increasingly on the Leave side, the Lib Dems and Greens on the Remain side, and Labour astride *both camps*
This then explains Labour's predicament - be too much of a Leave party, and it haemorrhages votes to Lib Dems and Greens
Be too much of a Remain party, and the voters that switched from it to the Tories in 2019 probably never come back
Up until December 2020, Labour faced the possibly legitimate critique that it wanted to "reverse Brexit". Whether it did or not is disputed, but it that critique stuck
But now that critique is *no longer relevant*
The UK is legally out of the EU
The EU would not want to the UK back in
And the impacts of being out of the EU are being felt
Labour does not - with regard to Britain's exit from the EU - need to prove its case any further. Only the wilder fringes of the Tory Party will keep flogging the dead horse that Labour wants Britain to Rejoin
On the other side, concern that the UK's exit from the EU is causing real practical damage to the economy and to people's livelihoods is real and is legitimate, and is even *starting* to be felt be Leave voters as well as Remain ones
And - as stated above - Labour faces the danger that it loses Remain voters to the Lib Dems and Greens
Labour cannot out-Brexit the Tories, and becoming a Rejoin party is likewise a dead end just now
(a small tangent: I'm not sure Labour ought to even be using the word Brexit any more, as the word is bundled up with Tories' way of carrying out the exit process - what the Tories did cannot be separated from the word - more on this comms point here: jonworth.eu/labour-a-new-r… )
Labour's position instead has to be based on a pragmatic normalisation of relations with the EU, *but with the UK still outside the EU*
To calm relations. To seek practical solutions to the many problems Brexit has thrown up
A new relationship between the UK and the EU in other words
Not Tory Brexit
And not Rejoin
But to put UK-EU relations on a calm and sensible footing. To see the EU as partners, not enemies
Attempting this up until December 2020 might well have been impossible. Now I do not think it is. Labour can safely brush off any accusation that it is a Remain/Rejoin party - it has adequately shown it is not
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The crux is this: these 4G/4G+ routers - especially from SFR/Bouygues/Orange - are positioned as DSL replacements in areas of France where DSL speeds are >10MBit/sec
In rural Bourgogne where I might need to be for a while, promised DSL speeds are:
Bouygues 12MBit
Orange 12MBit
SFR 6MBit
Free - no idea, their website is clear as mud
BUT... SFR can offer a 4G+ Box instead, with speeds of *up to* 260MBit/sec download and 50MBit/sec upload
Also I see a fight has broken out in the German media today about the separation of the network from operations in German rail
I can't get very worked up about this one
1) Building the infra to make Deutschlandtakt work is more important than this
2) At least other operators like Flixtrain exist in Germany - more than can be said for some other places. Do you need greater separation to facilitate this? Maybe a bit, but 🤷♂️
3) More important is addressing what to do if DB doesn't serve a big city with IC or ICEs - like Chemnitz for example - here there needs to be a way to give a contract to run those sorts of services that might be missing
🇬🇧 finally legally joined EU Digital COVID Certificate (EU DCC) scheme on Thursday last week, but there is still confusion as to what this means for people travelling from 🇬🇧 to 🇪🇺 (and 16 other countries in the scheme) and vice versa
This 🧵 explains what changed and what to do
⚠️ IMPORTANT ⚠️
The EU Digital COVID Certificate can only prove you are vaccinated. It has no bearing on what travel restrictions may or may not be imposed on someone travelling from or to a given country - so check before you travel!
🚨 BEAR IN MIND 🚨
There might be other ways to prove you are vaccinated *other than* the EU Digital COVID Certificate, and what works *to enter* a country might differ from what happens to prove your vaccine status *once you're in* - to enter a restaurant or museum for example
Another Jon-doesn't-understand-French-trains thought...
There are 8 TGVs each way a day, Paris-Mulhouse. 4 of these go further to Zürich HB, via Basel SBB.
But why not extend the Mulhouse TGVs to Basel SBB?
Mulhouse Ville to Basel SBB is just 22 minutes by regional train (TER). The fastest TGV manages it in just 18 minutes...
As loads of Deutsche Bahn ICEs, and SBB trains to all over Switzerland serve Basel, surely this would be a useful addition - for very little extra effort!
And while we're at it...
There are 2 direct TGVs each day from Paris Est to Colmar, via Strasbourg.
The whole approach to rail in 🇫🇷 is that - outside Île-de-France, and a couple of tiny pockets around Lyon, Strasbourg and Marseille - the 🚆 is a complement to the 🚗, not an *ALTERNATIVE* to it
This leads - in long distance rail travel - to abominations like Lorraine TGV, Aix-en-Provence TGV and Haute-Picardie TGV
These stations - nicknamed beetroot stations - are basically massive car parks, with no regular trains and just a 🚌 to the nearest town