American Vapor Manufacturers Profile picture
Nov 8, 2021 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Meet Congressman John Yarmuth (D-KY), Chairman of the House Budget Committee. He is directly responsible for inserting the destructive vape tax in the spending bill. THREAD Image
He injected a “nicotine tax” in what’s called a “manager’s amendment.” But before he did, he made sure to *remove any taxes on cigarettes*. Tobacco manufacturers in his home state had lobbied heavily for the exemption and are big donors of his. courier-journal.com/story/news/pol…
Mr. Yarmuth is also the founder of something called the Congressional Bourbon Caucus, which is explicitly designed to promote liquor drinking and protect whiskey from being taxed. Image
He told CNN he was drinking bourbon to “fortify” himself when he worked on the legislation!
But wait, doesn’t CDC say that young people abuse alcohol more than any other substance? Isn’t alcohol use among teens far more prevalent than youth vaping? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Image
Here is Yarmuth last April urging members of the European Union to eliminate tariffs on American liquor. He succeeded! The 25 percent tariff was lifted last month. Image
Here he is at a swanky event sponsored by his pals at the liquor industry trade association. Image
They even gave him a lifetime achievement award for helping to fight taxes and restrictions on liquor! Image
The point: Yarmuth exemplifies the public officials who seek to crush vaping and deny Americans the right to access the single most effective smoking cessation method ever devised – even as they protect other industries like liquor and cigarettes that are doing actual harm. END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with American Vapor Manufacturers

American Vapor Manufacturers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VaporAmerican

Dec 16
Doctors routinely mislead smokers about the benefits of vaping. How do we know? A member of our team was just subjected to a misinfo-laden lecture during a doctor's appointment. Let's dissect some of the myths health care providers are passing off as medical advice. THREAD 🧵 Image
The "information" sheet we were given after the appointment (pictured above) was produced by academic publishing giant @ElsevierConnect, and it's an absolute train wreck. It's also more than two years out of date. Image
The first and worst bit of nonsense in the document is that nicotine is "thought to" increase your cancer risk. Exactly who thinks this and why isn't explained. Image
Read 16 tweets
Sep 10
🔎⚖️ Solid forecast just posted on the legal undercurrents at issue before the Supreme Court in the upcoming Triton v. FDA case.
tobaccoreporter.com/2024/09/09/vap…Image
Features incisive analysis from our @GregTHR. Image
Also quotes US Solicitor General, Elizabeth Prelogar. NB: If she ends up arguing the case at SCOTUS herself, we'll take it as a sign the government has confidence in FDA's actions and is sending in their ace pitcher. OTOH, her absence *could* indicate FDA is on shaky stilts. Image
Read 7 tweets
Sep 4
🔎 Let's talk for a minute about why the Supreme Court amicus brief from Sen. Dick Durbin might actually be a good thing. It's because Durbin's fanaticism and hyperbole are on such lurid display that it'll give the Court a clear sense of just who's pushing vape prohibition.
1/🪡 Image
The first thing SCOTUS law clerks will notice is the Durbin brief is strictly partisan -- all the signatories are part of Durbin's particular wing of the Democratic party. On political issues, that's fine -- but in this context it signals there's no unanimity, as Durbin pretends. Image
The Court will also see that Durbin is not deploying measured persuasion but instead the most hyperbolic rhetoric he can dream up. Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 21
🚧 🧨 🚧
We need to talk about the debacle of 22nd Century's bet on low-nicotine cigarettes -- not only as an asinine business model but what the implosion says about @FDATobacco and the news media that covers nicotine policy.
1/ 🪡
Here is the company's stock chart for the last year and it's a complete wipeout. It's hard to overstate just how bad this is -- but if you invested in this company, you have basically lost your shirt. Image
But there was once a time, not long ago, when this stock was flying high -- selling for more than $1,200 per share with a market cap of nearly a billion dollars! What explains that? Why were investors flocking to this company? Image
Read 20 tweets
Jul 3
By granting cert in the Triton case, the Supreme Court is now poised to rebuke @FDATobacco's unlawful and destructive vape regulatory scheme. But readers of the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, the nation's two biggest papers, would have no idea. They didn't cover it.
1/🪡
It's not like these papers don't obsess over SCOTUS / FDA. They've each got scores of stories in just the last few days, including this one on Loper fretting how the agency's "critics" (read: the American people) may confront the agency. (Shut up and eat your spinach, peasants!) Image
@By_CJewett even indulged Mitch Zeller whining that he can no longer rig the system for his friends. (Unmentioned: Zeller was the architect of the ban on flavored vapes that now has the agency facing an epic defenestration. Cheer up, Mitch, you're about to make history!) Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 27
It’s literally incredible. The world’s leading public health authority, @WHO, is now getting regularly lit up by @CommunityNotes for brazen and calculated deceits about nicotine vaping. Let’s take a close look.
THREAD 🪡 Image
There is a widely-held scientific consensus that vaping is vastly less harmful than smoking. Yet with zero supporting evidence, WHO flatly insists the opposite, with the clear intent to dissuade the public. Image
Not only is WHO's claim wrong—they themselves have said it's wrong. Among the more than 100 scholarly sources cited in this community, two are from the World Health Organization itself! Image
Read 38 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(