Meet Congressman John Yarmuth (D-KY), Chairman of the House Budget Committee. He is directly responsible for inserting the destructive vape tax in the spending bill. THREAD
He injected a “nicotine tax” in what’s called a “manager’s amendment.” But before he did, he made sure to *remove any taxes on cigarettes*. Tobacco manufacturers in his home state had lobbied heavily for the exemption and are big donors of his. courier-journal.com/story/news/pol…
Mr. Yarmuth is also the founder of something called the Congressional Bourbon Caucus, which is explicitly designed to promote liquor drinking and protect whiskey from being taxed.
He told CNN he was drinking bourbon to “fortify” himself when he worked on the legislation!
But wait, doesn’t CDC say that young people abuse alcohol more than any other substance? Isn’t alcohol use among teens far more prevalent than youth vaping? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Here is Yarmuth last April urging members of the European Union to eliminate tariffs on American liquor. He succeeded! The 25 percent tariff was lifted last month.
Here he is at a swanky event sponsored by his pals at the liquor industry trade association.
They even gave him a lifetime achievement award for helping to fight taxes and restrictions on liquor!
The point: Yarmuth exemplifies the public officials who seek to crush vaping and deny Americans the right to access the single most effective smoking cessation method ever devised – even as they protect other industries like liquor and cigarettes that are doing actual harm. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s literally incredible. The world’s leading public health authority, @WHO, is now getting regularly lit up by @CommunityNotes for brazen and calculated deceits about nicotine vaping. Let’s take a close look.
THREAD 🪡
There is a widely-held scientific consensus that vaping is vastly less harmful than smoking. Yet with zero supporting evidence, WHO flatly insists the opposite, with the clear intent to dissuade the public.
Not only is WHO's claim wrong—they themselves have said it's wrong. Among the more than 100 scholarly sources cited in this community, two are from the World Health Organization itself!
Deceptive headline, half-truths and a whole lot of scaremongering. @USATODAY's @Mary_Walrath just wrote maybe the most irresponsible anti-vaping story we've ever seen. Let's do the fact-checking her editors should have done before publishing this train wreck. THREAD 🧵
Reporting on a study from @EmoryRollins, Walrath's piece veered off the rails immediately with the headline. There isn't a shred of evidence (in the article, the study or anywhere else) to support the claim that vapor poses a risk "like secondhand smoke."
We invite USA Today and Emory to prove us wrong. They won't, because there is no evidence causally linking nicotine vapor to *any* disease. Walrath buried this critical fact in the 9th (!) paragraph of her story.
🔎 This is horrendous. In a forum at @SMPAGWU yesterday (on misinformation!) @DrCaliff_FDA once again misleads Americans with the false notion that vaping is just as dangerous as smoking — thus deterring people from switching to a vastly safer alternative. 1/
Here's the verbatim remarks. Notice the false equivalence and the bunk gateway theory and how he lumps vaping in with lethal diseases -- even though vaping has injured or killed precisely no one and in fact saves lives.
Oh, more proactive you say? So far as we can tell, you haven’t lifted a finger to set the public record straight on what your own @FDAtobacco director says are widespread misperceptions about vaping.
🧐 Can we just talk for a second about the crayola math that @FDATobacco is using to rationalize its attack on open-system vape products? As @Vaping360 reports, the agency showcased an erroneous figure in its own press release.
1/🪡
And as our @GregTHR notes, the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey reported that 7.7 percent of middle and high school students had used an e-cig in the prior 30 days. AMONG THOSE respondents, 11.3 percent said they used a Smok product — which is 0.87 percent of total respondents.
The total number of students that completed this survey was 22,069. By simple calculation, that means that *176 total students* in the nationwide survey said they had used a Smok product in the prior 30 days. That’s the figure FDA is citing to outlaw this entire product line.
Blistering ruling against @FDATobacco just dropped in the 5th circuit vape case. Here's our statement, along with analysis.
THREAD 🪡
Here is a link to the full ruling, which is chock-full of hard-hitting language that rebukes FDA's methods, duplicity, and the horrendous outcomes it has caused. theavm.org/s/bb9i.pdf
🔎 👀
Here's a crucial piece just posted in the prestigious Chronicle of @Philanthropy by renowned journalist @MarcGunther. It examines the blinkered intransigence that is blocking progress on tobacco harm reduction. Let's dive in.
THREAD 🧵
The piece centers on Cliff Douglas @cdoug, a conscientious voice in this debate who has tried mightily to foster an open and principled discourse on the most effective ways to help people quit smoking.
But even someone with career-long, impeccable credentials in tobacco control is up against powerful forces that won't tolerate or engage with any viewpoint outside their cloistered bubble.