I'm not trying to get assaulted by any Slate staffers (historically dangerous bunch) but here's an example of me writing about 'wokeness' (or whatever you want to call it! truly don't care!) in a way that I think has some substance? Lotsa others have too.
jessesingal.substack.com/p/when-we-argu…
2/ Freddie deBoer and Matt Bruenig are two lefties who come to mind who have long tried to explain the new norms that have come to dominate liberal spaces (though they weren't yet dominant when they began writing about them). Instead of engagement, endless accusations of bigotry.
3/ Maybe 'critique' is more accurate than 'explain,' but if in 2021 you are arguing that NO ONE who is critiquing this stuff has any point other than they are mad white men don't dominate everything (!!), you could maybe try reading more widely? Also, don't threaten violence!
4/ Almost four years ago!!! And this is all much more dominant in liberal spaces than it was when Freddie rightly called it out.

Anyway my bad clearly FdB is just mad about the Civil Rights Act and this was his delayed response. Lotta pent-up anger.

5/ Here is one of the most hardened white supremacists you'll ever meet, Olúfémi O. Táíwò, explaining some of the problems with what he calls "epistemic deference" (very similar) in privileged settings . Another reactionary furious at progress.

thephilosopher1923.org/essay-taiwo
6/ The bigotry wafts right off the screen, wave after nauseating wave. Reads better in the original German tbh! Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jesse Singal

Jesse Singal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jessesingal

10 Nov
If I'm an editor at Scientific American, one of a small subset of mainstream publications devoted solely to, well, science, I definitely want to jump in with an aggressive take on each and every culture-war controversy. Very very good for the brand.
scientificamerican.com/article/the-an…
2/ Scientific American is either being intentionally dishonest about the content of this Wisconsin bill or none of the four authors of this article, or any of the editors, bothered to read it.

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2021/related/p… Image
3/ The link points not to the bill itself, but to testimony from a state rep who argues the terms in question *potentially* violate the bill. But the bill itself does not issue a blanket ban on using any particular terms. You can really just read it!

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/hearin… ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
30 Oct
The American Medical Association has just released "Advancing Health Equity: A Guide to Language, Narrative and Concepts," a strange document that calls for doctors to insert progressive politics into even plain statements of fact.

ama-assn.org/system/files/a…
2/ After the lengthy "Land And Labor Acknowledgement" -- new to me but apparently the evolution of the land acknowledgement -- the document quickly lays out guidelines that would make it very hard for doctors to write or speak clearly.
3/ For example, the word 'vulnerable' is out. You're not supposed to say "vulnerable groups," because this doesn't communicate progressive political beliefs. Try "Groups that have been economically/
socially marginalized."
Read 15 tweets
29 Oct
Does anyone, anywhere, regardless of their views on Taibbi, view this as a realistic assessment of the current situation and his thoughts on them?
2/ Good piece so far, not meaning to knock the author

nymag.com/intelligencer/…
3/ Fellow lefties who hate Taibbi or Yglesias or to a lesser extent me constantly make this very self-flattering error of imagining our disagreement with them stems from a profound shortcoming on our part: We're jealous, or we think there are too many writers of color (LOL),
Read 5 tweets
26 Oct
Anne Applebaum: This guy's career was ruined because he criticized arson

Michael Hobbes, summing up Applebaum's article: He got in trouble for criticizing BLM protesters

The dude is just fundamentally incapable of any charity or nuance when describing his perceived enemies
2/ This is *intentional*! He read the essay he is criticizing and decided to shield from his readers (no link to the incident either) the fact that the dude's career was destroyed because he said arson is bad. Instead, vague it up so it sounds like he's anti-BLM.
3/ “America is, like, the only country in the world that has prison rape” is the best Hobbes quote, from his Matthew Shepherd episode of YWA. (1:16:00 in that one.)

That this dude ever caught on as a debunker is just insane -- and it's such an annoying, dishonest style.
Read 9 tweets
25 Oct
1/ New from me, for paid subscribers: It Probably Makes More Sense To Banish College Admissions Essays Than To Banish SAT Scores

One thing I've harped on is how certain very flat understandings of race are erasing the importance and influence of class.

jessesingal.substack.com/p/it-probably-…
2/ This is a great example. Banishing the SAT is being treated as a blow struck for 'equity.' The effect of this has been to heighten the importance of admissions essays.

But imagine you're a rich parent and your goal is to get your child into a top school. Statistically, it
3/ is very unlikely your child is in the top 5% of SAT scorers. It is also very unlikely you can get your child there -- we know thanks to the research highlighted here that the test is much less gameable than many think.

So what practical effect will

slate.com/technology/201…
Read 7 tweets
25 Oct
The claim that British leftist feminists are allied with, like, Victor Orban relies on logical chains like "A UK court thought the evidence for blockers and hormones was paltry, and other people opposed to blockers and hormones used that ruling as evidence, and therefore..."
2/ You also have to believe that "a small cadre of British feminists with immense social capital" have major policy-making influence. I can only assume they meet in a bunker 20 floors below Big Ben.

This is a conspiracy theory and should be laughed at.
3/ What's going on here is JCW supports a very unpopular policy -- full-blown self-ID -- can't can't argue it on the merits. So she and others are trying to go the guilt-by-association route. It would be better to simply debate self-ID, which is not yet law in most places.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(