1/ @Uniswap v3 introduces a new form of MEV attack — Just-in-Time Liquidity (JIT), that allows LPs to add and remove concentrated liquidity positions atomically in one block. Sophisticated actors are running JIT bots to sandwich trades, to the detriment of pre-existing LPs 👇🧵
2/ Using @DuneAnalytics, we find the @Uniswap positions that are added and removed in the same block for the same LP. From this, we calculate the revenue from the fees of the sandwiched trade, and subtract the gas costs required to perform the JIT attack:dune.xyz/embeds/233623/…
4/ JIT liquidity attacks cause non-sophisticated LPs to lose out on fee revenue they would have otherwise had. However, JIT liquidity attacks actually are good for traders, since slippage is lessened over the tick range of the trade. dune.xyz/queries/233623…
5/ A Work-in-Progress (WIP) dashboard on Just-in-Time (JIT) liquidity is here: dune.xyz/ChainsightAnal…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We previously shared that @Uniswap v3 enables a new type of MEV attack — Just-in-Time (JIT) Liquidity Sandwiching, which has siphoned >$1M USD in profits away from non-mempool-aware Uniswap v3 LPs. Reactions to this discovery have been mixed... 👇 dune.xyz/ChainsightAnal…
1/ Impermanent Loss doesn't have to be this mythical phenomenon, such that it may only be explained clearly in a universe where Unicorns might live. No, today we pull back the curtain and present a tool to visualize and analyze impermanent loss by asset & investment time horizon.
2/ First, a quick primer on Impermanent Loss - it occurs when the price of either asset changes after you've initially supplied liquidity (as you hope it does, since price changes are how a liquidity provider actually earns fees). Or, to take it straight from the Unicorn's mouth:
3/ As seen from the above Uniswap documentation, a 5x price change results in a 25.5% loss on your initial investment. But you aren't holding your favorite alt-coin for a mere 5x price appreciation, right, anon? Let's consider if you were supplying LINK/ETH liquidity last year:
1/ Bancor Network's unprecedented volume share growth cannot be understated, and has been explored very little in a quantitative sense so far. We don't do ~ALphA LeAKs~, but keep scrolling for an update on the thread below to understand why BNT is still massively undervalued.
2/ Previously, we explored the difference between the 1inch referred volume to various DEX's on LINK, and saw how there was a massive gap between Bancor's expected (31%) vs. actual (8%) volume share. We surmised massive volume share growth was imminent. duneanalytics.com/embeds/17349/3…
3/ Well, things have changed A LOT in a month. Now, Bancor Network is capturing A MAJORITY (55%!!) of all LINK trades through 1inch. That's 2x more than a month ago. duneanalytics.com/embeds/20567/4…
But here's what's even more surprising and incredible...