Conservatives attacking the modern University might wish to reflect on the fact that it has got to be one of the most successful spontaneous orders of all time. /1
It's spontaneous in the sense that although it is the result of human action, it is not the result of human design. It's not as though the current mode of organization was envisioned and intended back when the University was founded in the 12th century. /2
It's successful in the sense that it has spectacular staying power. The University (still going strong at ~900 years of age) is older than the nation state (~400 years), the stock market (~250 years), and the corporation (~200 years). /3 britannica.com/topic/universi…
Nobody believes the University is perfect. But the fact that it's such a fantastically successful order should make it, to conservatives, worthy of respect and admiration. /4
Its staying power should temper our desire for radical reform – lest we want to be Adam Smith's "man of system," who believes he can rearrange human society in the manner that a chess player moves the pieces across the board. /5 oll.libertyfund.org/title/smith-th…
Thoughtful reform is welcome, even to a true conservative, but it must at all times be slow, deliberate, moderate, and piecemeal. Only then can we respect the wisdom inherent in existing forms of social organization. /6
Conservatives must not let their disdain for individual academics – and their political views – get in the way of their commitment to these fundamental principles. /fin
PS. The new "University of Austin" is an online debate society – not a university in any ordinary sense of the term – and as such more of a stunt than a threat to existing institutions. This is fine! It's just that the rhetoric is uncalled for.
My father, Jan Angner, died at age 75 in an offshore sailing incident on August 26. A Twitter memorial. /1
An experienced sailor, Jan was on his way from Lickershamn (Gotland) to Häradsskär near the mainland, when something went terribly wrong. The boat veered off course, and hit outlying rocks several nautical miles Southwest of where he was headed. It sunk shortly thereafter. /2
The search-and-rescue operation launched the following day was massive. It involved units from Swedish Rescue (Sjöräddningen), the Coast Guard, the Navy, and the Police; multiple airplanes and helicopters; several canine units; and a small flotilla of vessels of various sizes. /3
This article remains the best discussion of the ethical underpinnings of Swedish corona strategy, if anyone is still interested. The author is a leading political scientist, formerly of Uppsala University, and a long-standing member of policy circles. /1 dn.se/debatt/sverige…
The central normative ideas behind the Swedish legal framework that governed the response were equality, dignity, and autonomy – and the notion that human beings must never be treated as mere means, but always as ends in themselves. /2
This normative framework inspired the view that the best way to deal with challenges is to equip citizens with the information and other resources that would allow them to do the right thing of their own volition, rather than relying on mandates and bans to force them to. /3
Periodic reminder that in terms of outcomes, Swedish corona policy is thoroughly average in EU comparison – not exactly a model to be emulated by the rest of the world, nor a crime against humanity that should be prosecuted in the Hague.
Only about two weeks separate Sweden and the EU in this graph, which shows cumulative confirmed COVID-19 deaths per 1M people. Source: ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-da…
There's a lot of disinformation. Here's @ForeignPolicy, which I've always considered a reputable publication, writing that Sweden's death rates are among the highest in Europe: foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/22/swe…
One point that the pandemic has brought home to me is just how narrow people's expertise is. I'm regularly surprised by how a celebrated professor of X can exhibit a sub-college-level understanding of Y, even when X and Y are related. /1
Ask a professor of (say) virology about the properties of viruses and I assume you'll get a dependable answer; but ask about human behavior, public policy, causal inference, the law – or God forbid, ethics – the answer can go whichever which way. /2
Call me naive, but in the microenvironment where I work – in the intersection of science and the humanities – people take a certain amount of pride in being well read, even outside of their official domain of expertise. /3
Let me preface this by saying I think "war" is a terrible analogy for scholarly discourse: (a) it trivializes the real thing, (b) it suggests science is a zero-sum game, (c) it triggers norms suggesting that "all is fair," and (d) it encourages people to choose teams. /2
Anyway, let's ignore the clickbaity headline and the hard-charging introduction and go straight to the conclusion. Here's what Sauer thinks the evidence shows. /3