Thread by @ClimateAudit

this article perfectly exemplifies how preoccupation with Page FISA by so many Russiagate critics leads to false and distracting narrative. Article presumes that Page FISA was cornerstone of investigation and that DOJ was protecting its "poisoned fruit". Nope,

https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1457895776953290753

2/ while the Page FISA was seedy, it was, to mix metaphors, a dry well. It bore no fruit, poisoned or otherwise. Nothing from Page FISA appears in any of the proceedings or in Mueller report. In the end, it was irrelevant to progress main Russiagate hoax.

3/ yet we hear of almost nothing else - FISA, FISA, FISA - in complaints from majority of Russiagate hoax commentators and talking heads, even insiders like Ratcliffe.

4/ Page was damaged, not by the FISA per se, but by false allegations in the Steele dossier and by leaks from intel community that indicated that they took those false allegations seriously (including leak of existence of FISA on Page by reporter Blowjob Ali).