THREAD: Thank you to Lord Triesman @DavidTriesman for raising an oral question about women's sport in the House of Lords today /1
@DavidTriesman Baroness Noakes @1SVN hits the nail on the head. The only way to have safe and fair sport for ALL is to have two categories. An open category for everyone and one reserved for natal women only /2
@DavidTriesman@1SVN The minister replies "the evidence is clear that there are retained advantages in strength, stamina and physique for the average transgender woman, with or without testosterone suppression. It's not proved to be the silver bullet many hoped it would be". /3
@DavidTriesman@1SVN Lord Cashman can't criticise any of the legitimate, evidence-based concerns around trans participation in women's sport in his question /3
"I do not refer to the debate around this question"
@DavidTriesman@1SVN But he uses the opportunity once again to imply that women's concerns are rooted in transphobia
"but I am deeply concerned about the public debate around trans issues and the continuous depiction of them as a threat" /4
"we should ensure there is a way to have full, open and tolerant debate. And those organisations who accuse people who raise legitimate issues as being transphobic should desist" /5
@DavidTriesman@1SVN@LordPhilofBrum gets to the heart of the matter. He asks the minister if he will encourage sports bodies to have courage to actually take on board what is in this guidance. /6
@DavidTriesman@1SVN@LordPhilofBrum Baroness Wilcox "Does the minister support [the sports councils] message to create novel or modified versions of some sports to increase inclusion"
Yes: Sports should think in innovative ways to ensure nobody is left out, that might include novel or modified versions. /7
@DavidTriesman@1SVN@LordPhilofBrum Baroness Fox @Fox_Claire asks the minister to meet with @fairplaywomen who have "detailed proposals for including trans people in sport without disadvantaging woman, and who are courageous enough to open up the debate and not close it down". /8
@DavidTriesman@1SVN@LordPhilofBrum@Fox_Claire Baroness Hoey @CatharineHoey ends by emphasising the importance of fair competition and the irreversible biological differences between people who have been through male puberty compared to female puberty /9
Something big happened around 2015. There was a surge of transgender policies. Few noticed and other stakeholders were not consulted. This sloppy practice led to the mess we are in today /1
It was around this time that trans-activists captured the gay rights organisation Stonewall. /2
In 2016 we also saw prison policy change to allow male prisoners to self identify as trans and move to women’s prisons. /3
Current police policy is to record crime based on whatever sex the perpetrator says he is. First revealed by us in 2019. /2 fairplayforwomen.com/police_record_…
Data collection needs an overhaul. Sex is a fundamental variable and must not be conflated with ideological concepts such as gender identity. /3 fairplayforwomen.com/stop-conflatin…
British Kickboxing Council reveals itself as unprofessional and reckless with this knee jerk response to a serious report by UK sports councils. If this dodgy outfit gets tax payer funding from @sportengland that needs an urgent review.
Sport Councils conducted hundreds of interviews. This is the first comprehensive assessment of the views concerning the impact of trans inclusion on others. /1
"Women from a BAME background argued that success in sport was perhaps a key opportunity to achieve in a Britain where they were discriminated against because of both their sex and their race, and this was just another example of how society did them a disservice" /2
"Many interviewees were exasperated that women’s sports had made great strides in terms of participation numbers in the last 20 years, often in the face of male indifference, but that now this was all to be put at risk." /3
To develop their trans participation guidance the sports councils have undertaken the most comprehensive and in-depth consultation to date. This is impressive and should be considered the gold standard approach /1
@sportscotland@Sport_England@uk_sport@SportNINet@sportwales 166 one-to-one interviews were conducted. 98 had a minimum of 20 years involvement in organised sport such as athlete, coach, sports physician, medical specialist, sports scientist, inclusion officer, volunteer, official. Nearly all had an extensive lived experience in sport /2
@sportscotland@Sport_England@uk_sport@SportNINet@sportwales "10% of those approached declined the invitation, variously saying that the topic was “too toxic” or not wanting to “put their head above the parapet”. Some were senior people within British sport or *held advocacy roles for transgender inclusion*" /3
They evaluated the impact of their guidelines on ALL NINE protected characteristics. Not just gender reassignment, but all other equality strand too. This is the way to do it right. /2
RACE: "some respondents reported that the inclusion of transgender people in sport could be a barrier to participation for some people from ethnically diverse
communities. Therefore, race is referenced in the guidance as a consideration" /3