Seth Abramson Profile picture
Nov 10, 2021 22 tweets 4 min read Read on X
The far right disinformation campaign on the Steele dossier is as aggressive a disinformation campaign as America has ever seen.

The indictments they cite don’t say what they say they do; the dossier doesn’t say what they say it does; they’re rewriting our history in scary ways.
We’ve reached the point where you can't even state basic facts about the Steele dossier without nutcases showing up to tell you those basic facts are wrong.

And U.S. corporate media, because it sees no money anymore in the Trump-Russia scandal, is letting those lies proliferate.
The number of people aware of what the dossier says and how much of it was confirmed is dwindling. The number of people who understand Steele’s background and that the dossier was raw intel is dwindling. The number of people who know how the dossier came to light is dwindling.
No, the dossier did’t launch the Russia probe. No, the dossier doesn’t allege there’s a Trump sex tape. No, Steele didn’t tell the FBI the dossier was 100% accurate. No, none of Bill Barr appointee John Durham’s indictments have *anything* to do with the *content* of the dossier.
No, nothing in the dossier has been conclusively disproven. No, it’s not true media wasn’t able to find corroboration for any of the dossier. Yes—some of the dossier has been confirmed. No, there’s no evidence the dossier was a Russian intel operation. This is all disinformation.
And when Trump runs for POTUS in 2024, the disinformation that corporate media thinks is irrelevant today—is issuing no pushback on today—will be shouted by Trump at every single campaign rally for a year. Media is digging America’s grave by not responding to this disinformation.
Those of us who are derided as blind defenders of the Steele dossier have done nothing more—literally *not a single thing more*, since January of 2017—than ask that reporting on the dossier be *accurate* instead of a systematized disinformation campaign coordinated by Team Trump.
Right after the dossier was released nearly five years ago, I wrote on Twitter that it was likely around one-third *inaccurate*—exactly as its author told the FBI and the media at the time. I also said that another third of it probably was—by its nature—incapable of confirmation.
So when I wrote a book in 2018 that in minor part analyzed the question of whether there was corroboration for the remaining third of the dossier, I did so using only major-media sources. I found that some of that third had been confirmed and some had a mountain of corroboration.
I also made sure to carefully analyze Steele’s background and the manner by which his dossier went to the FBI and eventually came to light. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a man more lied about in American media than Chris Steele, nor work-product more lied about than his raw intel.
There’s now a viral clip of a host from The View haranguing Schiff about Durham’s latest indictment. The host falsely says the Danchenko indictment proves that Danchenko lied about the *content* of the dossier—made it all up. But the indictment has nothing to do with any of that.
Those of us who have been *painstaking* in sourcing our journalism on the Trump-Russia investigation are watching in horror as Trumpist insurrectionists and other far-right demagogues are effortlessly rewriting U.S. history without any pushback whatsoever. It’s truly a nightmare.
Mark my words, and save this tweet: the cowardice and laziness major media is showing now by permitting genuine villains to spread disinformation about Steele’s dossier and major-media reporting on the dossier will come to haunt America in 2023 and 2024 to an unimaginable degree.
Trump colluded with Russia.

He didn’t do it by helping them hack Democratic Party computers—and no one in media ever said he did.

He didn’t do it by funding the Kremlin’s propaganda ops—and no one in media said he did.

But that he colluded with the Russians is beyond doubt.
His Russia policy was written by Russian nationals and agents. He was secretly negotiating a deal with the Kremlin for his whole campaign—and lied to voters about it. He hid his many efforts to profit from his relationships in Russia. He knew his campaign head was a Russian pawn.
He withheld information about his team’s secret meetings with Russian agents from U.S. law enforcement. He greenlit a secret backchannel between himself and the Kremlin. He lied about whether the Kremlin had compromising information about him. His Russia policy betrayed America.
He publicly invited Russia to wage cyberwar on America. He spread what he knew was Kremlin disinformation. He sought to bolster a nonstate intelligence agency he knew was doing Russia’s bidding. He greenlit his team seeking dirt on Clinton from Russian hackers. He did Putin’s PR.
He obstructed justice and tampered with witnesses in the Russia probe. He helped his family cover up a meeting with Kremlin agents in his home. He pardoned at least three men he knew had secretly colluded with Moscow. He signed secret letters of intent to do business in Moscow.
He deliberately advanced Russian efforts to invade Europe, destroy NATO, and wage a domestic information war inside the United States. And all of this is just the tip of the iceberg.

And none of Trump’s defenders can deny any of this. They simply *lie about the dossier* instead.
They take the actual allegations against Trump and transform them into allegations that were never made so they can “refute” them. They pretend the dossier was an *report* rather than raw intel requiring additional follow-up. They call people Kremlin agents who are U.S. allies.
They impute knowledge to people even after it’s confirmed these people didn’t have the knowledge imputed to them. They build slogans they know are false—like “Clinton paid a Russian spy to interfere in the 2016 elecrion”—not because it’s true but because they know it’ll go viral.
The people pushing these lies are bad people who intend to end American democracy in the next 36 months. And the people in media who refuse to push back against these lies are cowards collecting a paycheck as Rome burns.

And those of us disgusted watching all this feel helpless.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Aug 4
This is the serial child rapist the Dear Leader is about to pardon to save himself.

Any MAGA providing rhetorical cover for Donald Trump as he seeks to cover up years of pimping teens—teens he'd fed booze and drugs—at the Plaza Hotel in the 1990s is as good as a pedo themselves.
Trump had his own teen rape victim procurer. He even turned his sex trafficking ring at the Plaza into a business that thereafter was accused of human rights violations by its workers—who deemed themselves slaves. What Epstein did in FL Trump not only allowed but mirrored in NYC.
All this is based on existing reporting. I've compiled hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of reliable major-media sources on these matters into PROOF OF DEVILRY, which will be published shortly as the seventh book in the NYT-bestselling Proof Series.

Donald Trump is a pedophile.
Read 13 tweets
Jul 19
CORRECTIONS:

(1) Trump and Epstein became friends in 1987, not 1990. The New York Times inexplicably cuts 3 years off their 17-plus-year friendship.

(2) Their friendship did *not* end because Epstein was a creep. It ended over a Florida real estate deal. nytimes.com/2025/07/19/us/…
To the credit of the NYT, it does eventually clarify Point #2 in the report.

I do wish it spent more time on the fact that an anonymous person dimed out Epstein after Trump got angry at Epstein over the real estate deal in 2004—and that Trump has a history of diming people out.
That question alone could change everything.

If in fact Trump extended his long history of being a disgusting snitch only when it personally benefits him by reporting Epstein to the police in 2004—or having an agent do it—it would confirm he knew exactly what Epstein was up to.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 17
Everyone in America needs to read this FREE—I’ve gifted it below—report from the conservative WALL STREET JOURNAL about Trump and Epstein.

Apparently the president has now threatened to sue the WSJ over this 100% accurate report due to how damaging it is.
wsj.com/politics/trump…
Holy actual literal shit OMG Image
By the way, the answer to the riddle in the note (in effect, “What do you get for men [Trump and Epstein] who have everything?”) is “You get them something one isn’t *allowed* to have.”

Trump then writes that he and Epstein have the thing they want in common—and it “never ages.”
Read 12 tweets
Jul 16
Can I make the blindingly obvious observation that now that we know Trump and his crew doctored the Epstein video we can't possibly trust that anything else they release will be all they actually have?

Wouldn't you just assume documents are being *burned and shredded* right now?
Like aren't we actually past the point of no return here? The second we learned that they cut out 3 minutes from the Epstein video and tried to pass it off as a legitimate piece of evidence, wasn't that pretty much the end of any Epstein credibility for the whole administration?
You don't have to be a former federal investigator to know that every moment between the release of that fake video and the inevitable future decision by Trump to release "everything" was a moment that Trump goons at DOJ/FBI spent destroying evidence that didn't center Democrats
Read 7 tweets
Jul 9
What would Trump do if this song went viral today?
WARNING: This song goes hard and makes no apologies.
LYRICS:

Gather round and I'll tell you of two Florida men
Who for twenty or so years were the best of friends
One of them ended up mysteriously dead
While the other one sleeps in a White House bed
Read 17 tweets
Jul 6
I have no difficulty saying that Trump and Musk caused some of the 50+ flood deaths in Texas.

And here's why: these two men with no expertise in disaster preparedness were told not to cut the positions they cut, and were told people would die if they did.

And then people died. Image
Moreover, Democrats are never going to start winning elections again until they're willing to call a thing just what it is.

Texas Democrats should be clear and persistent in saying that public service cuts overseen by non-experts desperate for billionaire tax cuts killed people.
And if Republicans respond by saying that Democrats are politicizing these deaths, the Democrats should respond: THAT'S BECAUSE THE DEATHS ARE POLITICAL. POLITICIANS CAUSED THEM.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(