General Electric is ending a century as a massive conglomerate by splitting into 3 parts.
It is front-page news. Lots of events led to this, but you may not be familiar with some of the more nefarious issues that caused GE to stumble, then collapse.
A thread.
1/
Its history:
The company was a household name practically since it was founded by Thomas Edison in the 19th century. It was a key member of all major indices, including the Dow Jones Industrials
GE began the 21st century as the most valuable conglomerate in America. The architect of this success was Jack Welch, often described as the best CEO of the 20th century.
Welch grew GE into a banking(!) titan with a peak market value of $594B in 2000.
But GE's track record of years of fantastic earnings turned out to be false. GE restated its earnings in 2005 + was fined by the SEC $50 million for accounting fraud in 2009.
4/
GE, it turned out, had been cooking the books for years, using GE Capital to "magically" beat by a penny every quarter.
Welch began as CEO in 1981 + left in 2000. Was he unaware of this fraud? Did he help to create it? He surely was the beneficiary of it.
5/
Welch was a PR master, skillfully working the press. He regularly appeared on GE-owned CNBC in the 1990s, touting GE’s stock. It was an obvious conflict of interest that he flouted regularly.
The result was a staid industrial old firm trading at lofty tech stock multiples.
6/
Without Welch's "magic" closer scrutiny soon followed.
It was unflattering: Restatements, fines, weak earnings, slowing growth rate, high P/E.
He left behind a ticking time bomb. A post-Welch collapse was arguably inevitable.
7/
His successor Jeff Immelt couldn't manage profits the same way.
Those smooth quarters under Welch turned out to be based on accounting fraud. Earnings returned to more normal volatility after Welch left. Earnings, not the 2000 crash, were the issue.
We cannot blame the most recent GE disaster -- $200M penalty for misleading investors on its earnings in its power and insurance businesses -- on Welch.
But it does reflect a corporate culture he created.
I find lists enormously helpful when using Twitter --instead of trying to drink from the firehose, dipping into a curated list makes the onslaught manageable.
1/
When I am interested in a narrow specific topic, I try to assemble the leading thinkers in a space that allows me to dive in when I want to.
Three-quarters of U.S. adults have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, setting a new milestone in the country’s fight against the pandemic.
Why do the other 25% risk getting very sick, hospitalized or dying? MISINFORMATION
I am working on a column "5 Non-Finance Books All Finance People Should Read."
My list of 5 consists of 3 hardcore must-haves, then a deathmatch for spots 4 + 5 among a dozen
What Non-Finance books do you think EVERYONE in finance should read?
Obviously, things like "Thinking Fast and Slow," "Fooled by Randomness" or "Thinking in Bets" are already so well adopted by Wall Street we count them as financial books.
When I started on a trading desk the book I saw most often was Sun Tzu's "The Art of War;" there was even a version titled "Art of War for Traders and Investors"