6/ Hmmm, think something didn't turn out as expected...
7/
8/
9/ Background reading: washingtonexaminer.com/news/identity-… I FOIAed Georgia Tech...you know, like what journalists are suppose to do. Key here appears that there were other legitimate contracts involving some of players too. I'm posting raw emails of interest for your researches as I dig
10/
11/ Ga Tech contract:
12/ Weird that the "from" line was entirely redacted here....Hmmm.
13/ LOL....but at least this guy is more reasonable than the press:
13/ LOL:
15/ And Republicans are the ones who are conspirator theorists.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Maryland Father's attorneys sure seemed to be playing fast and loose with the facts!
2/ Garcia: "I won't plead guilty unless you deport me to Costa Rica."
DOJ: "Well, if you insist."
Garcia: "Judge you must dismiss this case because they are forcing me to plead guilty."
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Another Trump win on appeal with D.C. Circuit vacating preliminary injunction. Order isn't loading yet so details to follow. 1/
2/ Here's what the case is about:
3/ And this isn't one of the cases where things were stayed, meaning this decision now frees the Trump Administration to get back to work. The court had originally stayed a portion of the injunction, allowing Trump to fire folks but then Plaintiffs claimed Trump didn't make individualized assessment so Court of Appeals decided it wasn't going to get into that morass and just said Trump can't fire anyone (it shouldn't have and I believe one of the judge's dissented on that cop out).
2/ So as background this is the consolidated (joined) cases involving USAID where the district court originally ordered payment of millions within like 36 hours and Justice Roberts granted an administrative stay and then said basically redo so it is feasible.
3/ The judge sorta redid and Trump has been complying, i.e., there was no stay in place so this is a WIN. Trump has also sought dismissal which should be granted based on this decision. AND the plaintiffs sought to enforce AND to depose to enforce so the ruling will 86 that!