Aaron Sojourner Profile picture
Nov 10, 2021 20 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Hourly wage growth has accelerated *very* sharply to unprecedented levels for younger Americans, less acceleration for others.

Quick acceleration for young among *both* job switchers & stayers.

New analysis below builds off @AtlantaFed Wage Growth Tracker (WGT) analysis.
WGT computes wage growth for people employed both in a given end month & a year prior. This avoids many problems from changes in who's employed.

For 3 age groups, WGT reports monthly median wage growth averaged over most-recent 12 end months.

Only Zoomers (age 16-24) zooming.
If one looks only over the most-recent 3 months, instead of 12, the recent acceleration for Zoomers really pops. I did this a few weeks ago.

Today, I have 2 new things...
First, I break apart the large 25-54 year old group.

Are the 25-34 year olds more like Zoomers or like older workers?

Here's the 12-month look. Wage growth always tends to be faster for younger than older workers.

Acceleration is just among Zoomers.
Here's the 3-month look, noisier but allowing most-recent acceleration to come be understood separately from prior.

Recently, 25-34 year olds are starting to get some acceleration. Fastest growth since pre-Great Recession. Not older tho.

Young having unprecedented wage growth.
The 2nd piece of new analysis is to look at differences between job stayers & job switchers by age group.

There's a common finding that wage growth is faster for job switchers than stayers. True in the WGT (figure).

Is Zoomer growth just that young people switch jobs more? No.
I created 4 age groups and divided each between switchers and stayers. Widened age bins to get sample.

Here's the 12-month figure for age 16-29 year olds. Switchers almost always get faster wage growth than stayers but they've seen similar acceleration into the last year.
Narrowing on the most-recent 3 months, see a similar pattern.

Among 16-29 year olds, both stayers & switchers seeing very rapid acceleration in wage growth recently.

Stayers at record level wage growth, around 9%.

Switchers match pre-2001 recession record, 12%.
For the next older group, 30-44 year olds, switchers are seeing faster acceleration, around 6%.

Stayers less.
For 45-59 year olds, wage growth around 3-4% for both switchers and stayers, highest since Great Recession but not back to those pre-GR rates.
For age 60+, around 2% growth for switchers and stayers.
A month ago, I speculated about why wage growth fastest among youngest.

Both young switchers & stayers getting acceleration seems consistent with this theory, raises for youngest workers as least expensive way to staff & satisfy internal equity norms.
Even given rising consumer prices, younger workers' wages are rising faster and they may feel their economic situation improving dramatically.

For older Americans, price rises are more likely to be outpacing wage growth.
Is acceleration in young workers' wages just bcz they're more likely to work in Leisure & Hospitality?

Predicting median wage growth in the individual level data for the most-recent 3 months yields the following estimates.

Age dominates, controlling for lots else.
Workers older than age 24 are getting 9-12% lower median wage growth rates than 16-24.

Leisure & Hospitality (indgroup) is associated with 1.2% faster median wage growth than the omitted industry (Construction & Mining).
Controls for age, salary, job switching, gender, educ, part/full time, occ skill group, industry, coarse race, MSA status, region, and wage quartile.

Caution & more work is warranted here. Data may be thin, not using weights.... But suggestive.
Comparing the July-Sept 2021 coefficients to those from July-Sept 2019 shows that the age associations have really changed, while others have changed less.

Sorry for the terrible labelling. It's a pain to clean up.
Finding big pattern breaks always makes me nervous. Real or data/coding error? Love to see others dig in.

But these are medians, so should be robust to outliers. Also acceleration for young workers among both switchers & stayers. Not just one.

Other ideas to probe?
Median wage growth is similar across industries among young workers over the last 3 months.

Fastest in Leisure and Hospitality but very similar in Construction & Mining (omitted = 0), Public Admin, Finance & Business Serv.
Here's the code, which build off the Atlanta Fed data and code.
github.com/aaronsojourner…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Sojourner

Aaron Sojourner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aaronsojourner

Jun 9, 2023
This paper is SOOOOO interesting. I love it.

They posit 3 types of Americans with different relations to the labor market. Folks in:

- primary enjoy steady work, any job search quick.

- 2ndary struggle to find jobs, move across U, E, N a lot.

- 3iary mostly out.
These bring the Dual Labor Market hypothesis home to the U.S.

Interprets short-panel linked CPS data combining:

- a hidden Markov model of observed transitions by latent type,

- a measurement model uses many rich CPS questions to assign each person type probabilities.
The primary market, estimated to represent 55% of American population, enjoys super-high LFPR/EPOP, super-low UR.

2ndary (14%): in LF 73% of time but unemployed a third of that time.

3riary (32%): out 91% of time. UR intermediate when in.

Heterogeneity that matters. Image
Read 11 tweets
May 21, 2023
Amazon warehouse mgmt uses intensive, opaque monitoring as input to discipline, pay, promotion, & firing decisions.

MN just passed a law requiring employers like them to make such standards, incentives, & data transparent to workers.

Fascinating on a few fronts... Image
No one likes working to unclear standards.

But mgmt often prefers it,⬇️some gaming &⬆️ managers' discretionary power.

Even if mgmt uses clear well-justified rules, if workers don't know them, feel arbitrary.

Mgmt says, trust us. Many workers do not.
thenation.com/article/politi…
In a workplace with new tech-enabled, intensive, high-stakes monitoring, it's interesting to see workers demand & win transparency of rules & of data.

Amazon warehouse workers in MN have actively pushed to improve working conditions for a decade @AwoodMpls. This is latest win.
Read 5 tweets
May 18, 2023
Lower-income Americans often need access to $ NOW!

Speedier payments benefit those most in need.

Instant payments, like @federalreserve’s FedNow coming July, would create billions in consumer value.

🧵my new paper w/the great @ryanmcdevitt
direct.mit.edu/rest/article-a… Image
We measure willingness-to-pay (WTP) for $ today versus $ soon.

Use transaction data from a bank that offers both bank accts (BA) & check-cashing (CC), unusual.

Usually, 2 services offered by different bizs = tough to leverage customer choices to credibly isolate WTP.
@springbankny was 1st new S. Bronx-based bank in 25 years when in 2007 when started as Check Spring Bank. Later I served on & chaired bank’s board.

Aimed to deliver financial services value to S. Bronx community, compete head-to-head with check cashiers.
spring.bank/about-us Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 28, 2023
Wealthiest 0.1% of Americans saw 5.0% of their wealth disappear from the quarter before the Fed started hiking rates in 2022Q1 to 2022Q4

The next 0.9% saw 7% of their wealth disappear

In contrast, the least-wealthy half of Americans saw their (much smaller) wealth rise 17%
The price of Fed action to fight inflation has so far been paid mostly by wealthier Americans whose assets in stocks, crypto, & elsewhere deflated.

If Fed causes employers to start destroying jobs in the real economy, the price burden will shift dramatically.
This is how it started and the labor market has held up remarkably well. The Fed can break it though.

Hard-landing advocates claim doing so is the only way to bring down inflation.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 29, 2023
10% of America's abt 155 million employees belong to a union.

+1 percentage point a year requires +1.55 million net members if employment flat.

In 2022, union membership rose 273K, 6X smaller.
Estimated +273K from @BLS_gov worker survey. Reflects net hiring by union employers, priv (+193K) + public (+80K) sector, & new organizing inside & outside NLRB.

Abt 52K private sector workers voted to newly unionize in 2022, eyeballing @KevinReuning's NLRB data. 30X smaller.
@BLS_gov @KevinReuning The AFL-CIO's strategy aims to organize 1 million workers over 10 yrs, +100K/yr pace.

That's either 37% of the 2022 pace if it includes all change or less than 2X 2022's pace if newly unionized only.

Is this under-promising to over-deliver?
reuters.com/world/us/us-la…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(